Originally posted by chairman_mao
Its getting ridiculous. I like both the mag and the Ion for what they are, but I dont bash one or the other for thier weaknesses.
| | Originally posted by Tom in reffrence to a post saying he acted like my dad... "That's right! WHO'S YOUR DADDY!!" ALL QUIT AND NO GO!!! Team Icky Forest-Shatnerball 2003!!! www.tunamart.com DONT SUPPORT HYPOCRITICAL MISSLEAD YOUTH, BOYCOTT HK |
| | Originally posted by Tom in reffrence to a post saying he acted like my dad... "That's right! WHO'S YOUR DADDY!!" ALL QUIT AND NO GO!!! Team Icky Forest-Shatnerball 2003!!! www.tunamart.com DONT SUPPORT HYPOCRITICAL MISSLEAD YOUTH, BOYCOTT HK |
. On the other hand, perhaps you could use yourself to fix your attitude.~my e-mag~ ~ule frame~ ~ule rail~ ~x-valve~ ~3.2 software~ ~polished no-rise body~ ~black 10" freak kit~ ~smoke halo b~ ~Fl05283 68 3000 flatline~ |
I get tired of hearing that. I don't know how many times I've posted in threads that Palmer, CCI, Sterling, etc. aren't affected by the ION. I also doubt DMC's, Angels, [insert other high end $1500 marker here] are affected very much at all either. Now, I have nothing against the ION, and think it has definately placed itself well in the market due to price, performance, and brand recognition, but it is probably hurting sales of lower end guns or guns close to its price range a lot more than high end or specialty markers. I don't have ANY numbers to back this up, but I just don't see someone that is going to purchase a Blazer or Phantom or DMC going "Oh, well, since the ION has been released, why would I want one of those."
Comment