matrix cycling speed

[MonsterMag]

And trust me, You'll need alot of it.

I think you need more than I do.
Do us a favor and post less.

[Automaggot68]

I think you need more than I do.
Do us a favor and post less.

Do the REST of us a favor and follow my example then.

[-=Squid=-]

I think you need more than I do.
Do us a favor and post less.

Oh my God, great comeback, at least he has some credibility here.

Hint - you don't.

[MonsterMag]

Do the REST of us a favor and follow my example then.

You need to read
Me Posts: 573
You Posts: 1,677

Squid go sell macro

[-=Squid=-]

You need to read
Me Posts: 573
You Posts: 1,677

Squid go sell macro

Uhh... You used to have thousands of posts.

[Automaggot68]

Uhh... You used to have thousands of posts.

Yep, Emagballer.
You had more than I did when you had that name, and you had more post on that name than I do NOW.

[MonsterMag]

Wow that was great one . I never expected you to say that

[-=Squid=-]

Wow that was great one . I never expected you to say that

I swear to God, you are the biggest idiot on the internet.

[SlartyBartFast]

that brings up another point though, i know this has been said before, but people always bring up drop tests and hold a full hopper out and say it can feed at say 35 bps, but on a marker the ball is stopped while the marker is firing, then loads quickly, then the marker fires again.

All your questions are answered at WARPIG. The standard loader test shows what loaders can do on a marker.

Those tests alone prove many of those boasting super high BPS wrong.

[SlartyBartFast]

I had my viking at 31 bps (runaway bounce). From looking at the video of it, I can't see any noticeable dropoff.

You can SEE drop-off?



What a joke.

And the video was shot at how many frames per second?

And how exactly would you be able to see drop off?

You'd need a chrono or need to chart the path of all the paintballs....

[SlartyBartFast]

I guess I was thinking about being about to play while shooting that fast. I think the scuba might slow you down a bit, but you could be a killer back player.

Yeah that's right. The Mag needs a SCUBA, but every other marker can magically be supplied enough air flow from standard tanks.

Let's see the other markers doing it off-field with a SCUBA before we believe any on-field claims.

[MonsterMag]

I swear to God, you are the biggest idiot on the internet.

You so just crushed my self esteem.

[-=Squid=-]

The mag needed a scuba because it was mechanical, and needed a high input pressure so it would runaway.

If he was getting significant dropoff, it would be noticable because it would cause the entire
stream of paint to slowly begin declining.

Have you not even seen the videos posted by Zman and Steelrat with the mags and vikings?

You just made yourself look like an idiot for posting all that.

And Monstermag, that's the goal. Always remember, noone likes you.

[slade]

All your questions are answered at WARPIG. The standard loader test shows what loaders can do on a marker.

Those tests alone prove many of those boasting super high BPS wrong.

heh, thanks. i saw that before but forgot about it.

and that test shows that the fastest an lcd matrix can load and shoot properly with a halo b w/ victory is 20-22 bps. that guy was claming 35 with the same marker and almost the same hopper

[billmi]

heh, thanks. i saw that before but forgot about it.

and that test shows that the fastest an lcd matrix can load and shoot properly with a halo b w/ victory is 20-22 bps. that guy was claming 35 with the same marker and almost the same hopper

Some things to keep in mind....

The hopper tests on WARPIG were testing for maximum rate of fire, sustained over 10 shots. That's not the same as the max reachable, with one or two shots out of a string, which can be higher.

Also, I have yet to compare any display equipped 'gun that accurately reported the ROF it was shooting.