AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
I colored it red to make it stand out more from the DM4.
Anyway, as for cutting it out, magnetic lasso is your friend
I had thought of that but decided to go with the full coloured version as that had taken so long to do...I have Photoshop but don't use it (too many windows and options..one day I guess) that pic edit was done with Paintshop Pro which has it's version of Magic Lasso but mine is set too sensitive that was why it took so long to do.
Back to the thread topic...I agree with your follow up comment about things being pointless in some comparisions plus you are 100% correct to line the two up by the grip frame...which was exactly the way I did it, if wasn't for the fact that you swapped your original pic other readers of this thread could look at my editted pic and yours and think they were copies of each other.
Yakatori...no you aren't getting flamed for the sake of it. You just seem unable to grasp sensible debate and once again you have resorted to name calling...(well done Thordic for not biting)
Here, I realigned your picture so the bottom of the grip frames line up, and the difference in size isn't at all as much as you made it out to be. It's mostly shorter in the front and back, not the top.
thanks, thats exactly what i was talking about. the two pictures were set up to be exaggerated. id still take the dm4, its slightly bigger but thats not worth $500.
Originally posted by phantomhitman
I can get your a pic of my dm5, with a dm4, and a pm5, and then a pm6, and then a dm3, throw in a dmc, dig up the old shocktech dm5, and then teh shocktech dm5, then a dm6 on top. But then I would be called a dye trix whore and get booted of of ao.
or, youd have a LOT of friends quickly.
xvalve, ule body, logic vert frame, WWA barrel
68/30 PE nitro tank
cp unimount
halo B
well I own both the DM4 and the 06 proto and I say it IS worth the extra money. Its not that much more than a DM4. A nicely upped DM4 is about 600-700 depending on ups. Only ppl sell them lower want to sell fast, and Ill bet they are selling them to get an 06.
So, Id pay 200+ extra to get the 06 simply because its smaller, lighter, shoots the same, better resale, and an all around better gun.
And as Ive said again and again. The 06 is about 2.1 lbs w/ barrel, reg. etc. The Dm4 is 3.2. Thats over a lb in the gun alone. It makes a difference in these areas:
running
snapshooting faster
carrying around all day
getting into a bunker tighter
playing front
I dont care if youd buy the DM4 instead. Go for it.
Have any of you seen or held both?
the pictures in the thread were not intended to exaggerate size. Stop being foolish. You guys are acting like I posted it like that on purpose. "oh ya, everything is a conspiracy"
So please tell me, if overlapping the guns w/ one in front of the other decieves the size of the gun, how would YOU have taken the picture?
I never said that. I never acted like they are the best thing invented.
All I did was post a subjective picture of the two guns for a comparison of the size. All the other nonsense is what you AOers have dreamt up.
Rubbish. You posted a picture that was badly taken (by you or not but they weren't identical in terms of perspective) and then complained about the way in which they were compared. When the answers didn't appear to go the way you intended/hoped for you resorted to name calling.
Rubbish. You posted a picture that was badly taken (by you or not but they weren't identical in terms of perspective) and then complained about the way in which they were compared. When the answers didn't appear to go the way you intended/hoped for you resorted to name calling.
liar. I ask you again>>>>> how would you have taken them?
If I was trying to decieve the comparison, would I have posted the side by side? I even said that the picture was taken from the slight angle above.
I didnt RESORT to name calling until Automaggot referenced the bruce lee grips as trying to make a connection to the hybrid has a bad day thread. And which they arent even made by hybrid as I stated in that thread. Yet he spams about it.
Then some dillweed gets called dillweed cause he gets a sarcastic remark about some stupid carriages.
Then thoradic starts w/ his flaming.
.....then AO blames me of taking the pictures w/ INTENT to decieve. wtf is that all about. Are you a bunch of fools?
You are turning out to be as bad as the teenie boppers on AO mark.
read through before you start your nonsense too.
And for the freaking record. I didnt take the pictures to intentionally exaggerate the size of anything. Thats foolish.
ANd I ask AGAIN......HOW WOULD YOU HAVE TAKEN THE PICTURES?
liar. I ask you again>>>>> how would you have taken them?
If I was trying to decieve the comparison, would I have posted the side by side? I even said that the picture was taken from the slight angle above.
I didnt RESORT to name calling until Automaggot referenced the bruce lee grips as trying to make a connection to the hybrid has a bad day thread. And which they arent even made by hybrid as I stated in that thread. Yet he spams about it.
Then some dillweed gets called dillweed cause he gets a sarcastic remark about some stupid carriages.
Then thoradic starts w/ his flaming.
.....then AO blames me of taking the pictures w/ INTENT to decieve. wtf is that all about. Are you a bunch of fools?
You are turning out to be as bad as the teenie boppers on AO mark.
read through before you start your nonsense too.
And for the freaking record. I didnt take the pictures to intentionally exaggerate the size of anything. Thats foolish.
ANd I ask AGAIN......HOW WOULD YOU HAVE TAKEN THE PICTURES?
1. I suggest you re-read all my replies before you accuse me of being a liar!
2. Two pictures taken both the same distance from the camera would have been the ideal setting
3. No one accused you of trying to deceive, certainly not me.
4. Totally different thread and you started called Thordic names by badly spelling his name in a pretty lame attempt to get a reaction.
5. If you think I am as bad as the teenie boppers you are gravely mistaken.
6. I certainly hope that wasn't a threat aimed at me.
7. See #2
8. The internet is a place for information and mis-information so very often you will find something that you don't agree with so don't get irate when things don't turn out the way you hoped. You are obviously feeling rather raw overr the way you have been replied to in the other thread, don't carry those feelings over to another unrelated subject.
1. I suggest you re-read all my replies before you accuse me of being a liar!
2. Two pictures taken both the same distance from the camera would have been the ideal setting
3. No one accused you of trying to deceive, certainly not me.
4. Totally different thread and you started called Thordic names by badly spelling his name in a pretty lame attempt to get a reaction.
5. If you think I am as bad as the teenie boppers you are gravely mistaken.
6. I certainly hope that wasn't a threat aimed at me.
7. See #2
8. The internet is a place for information and mis-information so very often you will find something that you don't agree with so don't get irate when things don't turn out the way you hoped. You are obviously feeling rather raw overr the way you have been replied to in the other thread, don't carry those feelings over to another unrelated subject.
I didnt call thoradic a name until he said I am some exhibit at a retard show or whatever. I had a good reason to do so.
And taking two pics separately at the same distance doesnt show a comparison. That is why I took a pic of the guns side by side, the same distance, in the same picture. They are both laying on the floor in my computer room.
Putting one on top of the other as others have mentioned will create an illusion of size. Only the guns are so close that it doesnt create that illusion. And if thats the case, then the 06 proto would seem BIGGER since its in the front. Therefore, i was not trying to make it look smaller through some stupid camera illusion as other have eluded to.
And so, I didnt not RESORT to name calling. I got defensive when someone starts the flaming. Automaggot first w/ the reference to the hybrid post about the bruce lee grips, which he is wrong about. And Ive said so time and time again, but ppl dont seem to get it.
Then thoradic making his stupid flaming remarks. Hence the change of his name because that is what he was being.
And taking two pics separately at the same distance doesnt show a comparison. That is why I took a pic of the guns side by side, the same distance, in the same picture. They are both laying on the floor in my computer room.
Not with long enough glass. Perspective compresion is quite good for a direct size comparison with a long (tele) lens. When the distance to the film plane (or digital sensor) is similar to for each of the items being photoed, which you can do with a long lens, the relative sizes will be maintained. Since the guns are not more than 1.5" apart, put the camera back as far as you can and use the longest glass (or setting) you have. Then line them up with a common point (like the bottom of the body).
Better yet, setup the camera on a tripod and put each marker to be compared in the same exact position (using long glass will also help eliminate distortion). Take an image of each and combine in some image editing program. You can make your life easier by using a uniform background that's a different color than anything on the guns. That will make dropping out the background easier.
Comment