What exactly happened between smar parts and AGD?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lohman446
    Useful posts: 7
    • Jun 2003
    • 9315

    #16
    Probably not true of the pin valve or HPA. We see them as common place because they were "gifts" to the sport. They would have never developed to where they are now, as far as being common place, if they had been patented.

    As to AGD and electros. TK does not feel the risk to reward analysis is worth putting out a new electro. I think that the legal environment is part of it, we have frankly been told it is, but its not all of it.
    "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

    Comment

    • Beemer
      I could tell you but then.

      • Oct 2003
      • 3250

      #17
      Originally posted by Lohman446
      Probably not true of the pin valve or HPA. We see them as common place because they were "gifts" to the sport. They would have never developed to where they are now, as far as being common place, if they had been patented.

      I dont think a patent on those would have changed anything.

      Comment

      • aqua_scummm
        matthewpace.blogspot.com
        • Oct 2006
        • 185

        #18
        Originally posted by Beemer
        I dont think a patent on those would have changed anything.
        Seriously, if Tippmann charged 25 cents on each pin valve produced and AGD tacked one dollar onto the price of each HPA system, they would be just as popular.

        Pin valves grew quickly because they were so safe compared to thermo tanks, what price would you put on safety?

        HPA grew because it allowed rapid rates of fire in the summer without using liquid CO2 or experiencing shootdown using gaseous CO2, and we all know what price people will pay for speed... look at the prices of cyborgs, angels, and quests.

        edit: someone is gonna say it was for consistency, well you can shoot just as fast with CO2, it just wont be as consistent

        Comment

        • Pneumagger
          I like 'Mags.

          • Jun 2006
          • 3556

          #19
          Originally posted by aqua_scummm
          edit: someone is gonna say it was for consistency, well you can shoot just as fast with CO2, it just wont be as consistent
          It was for consistency

          Anyways, I'm pretty sure the smartparts patent coverd the useage of an electrical switch that started a firing sequence or something. Not the idea of actual electronics IIRC.

          Comment

          • Lohman446
            Useful posts: 7
            • Jun 2003
            • 9315

            #20
            Originally posted by Beemer
            I dont think a patent on those would have changed anything.
            Are we talking a patent or an enforced patent / licensing agreement?
            "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

            Comment

            • aqua_scummm
              matthewpace.blogspot.com
              • Oct 2006
              • 185

              #21
              Originally posted by Pneumagger
              It was for consistency

              Anyways, I'm pretty sure the smartparts patent coverd the useage of an electrical switch that started a firing sequence or something. Not the idea of actual electronics IIRC.
              Eventually it got to any paintball marker with an electronic on/off switch, button, etc of any kind. Meaning turning the marker on or off, turning a solenoid on or off, etc.

              Although I think it's no longer upheld to that point

              Comment

              • Beemer
                I could tell you but then.

                • Oct 2003
                • 3250

                #22
                Originally posted by Lohman446
                Are we talking a patent or an enforced patent / licensing agreement?
                Take your pick.

                It wouldnt have mattered because the demand was there. Nobody cared about the cost. Everybody wanted it and it wasnt so cheap to have it anyway back then. Royalties would have been paid in a heartbeat. The cost wasnt gonna stop us. I played thru that paradigm shift and saw it first hand.



                Originally posted by aqua_scummm
                Pin valves grew quickly because they were so safe compared to thermo tanks, what price would you put on safety?
                Where did you get this info or why do have this opinion?

                Comment

                • aqua_scummm
                  matthewpace.blogspot.com
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 185

                  #23
                  The safety wasn't as much from the valve itself, but the standardization. Plenty of people rigged their thermo tanks using fittings not rated for the pressures of CO2. By standardizing the valves and lines, as well as integrating them into the marker, Tippmann helped ensure player safety

                  I'll admit I am too young to be saying this firsthand, I started in 97, but that's what an old field manager once told me
                  Last edited by aqua_scummm; 03-09-2007, 03:03 AM.

                  Comment

                  • p8ntbal4me
                    No more UTBs!
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 2560

                    #24
                    I remember seeing a patent in Haveblu that was pre-dated before the PVI shocker that SP says is their "cover all" say all patent.

                    Im looking for it now,.. it was somethign like 15 months registered earlier than ANY SP patent to date.

                    There was a big disscusion about it on the Tinkers Guild too.
                    _______________________
                    Jai "P8ntbal4me" Menard

                    Comment

                    • Lohman446
                      Useful posts: 7
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 9315

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Beemer
                      Take your pick.

                      It wouldnt have mattered because the demand was there. Nobody cared about the cost. Everybody wanted it and it wasnt so cheap to have it anyway back then. Royalties would have been paid in a heartbeat. The cost wasnt gonna stop us. I played thru that paradigm shift and saw it first hand.





                      Where did you get this info or why do have this opinion?
                      HPA had a hard enough time getting accepted without more cost. Im not so sure. Its an interesting question.
                      "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

                      Comment

                      • spectre184
                        PF classic owner
                        • Apr 2004
                        • 228

                        #26
                        Here is 1st gun that started electros But look at the gun that actually made it into production. Scroll down to last pic and see what it says. Course not long after SP bought out PN (I think) and you know the rest..........
                        Last edited by spectre184; 03-09-2007, 11:43 AM.

                        Comment

                        • y0da900
                          Mechanical Engineer & Nerd
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 215

                          #27
                          Originally posted by spectre184
                          Here is 1st gun that started electros But look at the gun that actually made it into production. Scroll down to last pic and see what it says. Course not long after SP bought out PN (I think) and you know the rest..........

                          I think the Cyber 9000 came after the Shocker, and was PVI's attempt to keep going after SP pulled out and started building the shocker themselves.

                          Comment

                          • Ydna
                            Paintball Manufacturer

                            • Apr 2004
                            • 264

                            #28
                            That's correct.
                            Andy "Ydna" DuBuc
                            Nummech Products & ZDSPB

                            Comment

                            • SCpoloRicker
                              HA HA I'm custom!!1
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 4375

                              #29
                              whatever
                              God....I guess I was probably returning videotapes.

                              Comment

                              Working...