Global Warming?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AirAssault
    Those aren't pillows!!!!

    • Apr 2003
    • 1566

    #16
    To believe that what we do on this ball called Earth does nothing to effect it is just STUPID. Air doesnot escape, Co2 emmisions just don't simply disapear. An eco system can only take so much. The Earth does pendulum back and forth between warmer/colder times, but they can test the air from hundreds of thousands of years back (air locked in ice, pulled out from core drilling) and tell that it is worse off today then years ago. To simply dismiss something that could have major impact on generations to come is not only dumb but in typical American fashion, arrogant. Most other industrialized countries are taking steps to limit their impact on the Earth, but not the mighty Americans, we do what we want because we can.

    It's a joke, the retarded way a lot of Americans think is a joke, and one day we will reap what we sow. To bad it won't be any of the nimrods alive today, but our childrens children that have to fix our mess. Plus, even if it is all fooey and we are just crazy, what does it matter. Why is it so bad to get away from fossil fuels? We are in a war for fossil fuels, we pay out the nose for fossil fuels, we are a SLAVE to other countries because of fossil fuels. The trillions spent over the last 30/40 years could of been put to developing alternative forms of fuel, but of course the big wigs in Detroit, California, and other states/cities that produce vehicles that rely on the combustion engine didn't want to hurt their bottom line. Of course there are the oil companies that cry and whine how production cost more so they have to charge more, yet are pulling in RECORD PROFITS each and every quarter.

    So, if you don't belive in global warmin, how about you become more energy efficient so we don't have to fight wars, shape our foreign policy, and bow down to countries that don't like us. (remember, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were from our good buddy Saudi Arabia). Also, how about people that poo poo GW stop being selfish jerks and think about the future generations of this country, its not all about YOU. Of course if Americans actaully thought about others instead of just ourselves, our heads might explode.
    Due to the objections of a certain Canadian, this space is now for rent.

    Comment

    • hellbatman
      Registered User
      • Mar 2007
      • 30

      #17
      There have been volcanoes that have put more CO2 and junk into the air than we have in out entire history...there were some figures somewhere on how the California fires put up more CO2 than like a million cars in a year or something...Ill see if I ca find a link after work.

      Comment

      • Altimas
        Registered User
        • Feb 2004
        • 909

        #18
        Originally posted by AirAssault
        To believe that what we do on this ball called Earth does nothing to effect it is just STUPID. Air doesnot escape, Co2 emmisions just don't simply disapear. An eco system can only take so much. The Earth does pendulum back and forth between warmer/colder times, but they can test the air from hundreds of thousands of years back (air locked in ice, pulled out from core drilling) and tell that it is worse off today then years ago. To simply dismiss something that could have major impact on generations to come is not only dumb but in typical American fashion, arrogant. Most other industrialized countries are taking steps to limit their impact on the Earth, but not the mighty Americans, we do what we want because we can.

        It's a joke, the retarded way a lot of Americans think is a joke, and one day we will reap what we sow. To bad it won't be any of the nimrods alive today, but our childrens children that have to fix our mess. Plus, even if it is all fooey and we are just crazy, what does it matter. Why is it so bad to get away from fossil fuels? We are in a war for fossil fuels, we pay out the nose for fossil fuels, we are a SLAVE to other countries because of fossil fuels. The trillions spent over the last 30/40 years could of been put to developing alternative forms of fuel, but of course the big wigs in Detroit, California, and other states/cities that produce vehicles that rely on the combustion engine didn't want to hurt their bottom line. Of course there are the oil companies that cry and whine how production cost more so they have to charge more, yet are pulling in RECORD PROFITS each and every quarter.

        So, if you don't belive in global warmin, how about you become more energy efficient so we don't have to fight wars, shape our foreign policy, and bow down to countries that don't like us. (remember, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were from our good buddy Saudi Arabia). Also, how about people that poo poo GW stop being selfish jerks and think about the future generations of this country, its not all about YOU. Of course if Americans actaully thought about others instead of just ourselves, our heads might explode.
        This Scientist has discovered that Global warming is indeed man made:




        The end is Nigh!!
        "If we aren't supposed to eat animals...why did God invent BBQ sauce?" - Army
        AO Feedback

        Comment

        • MANN
          I am in TN. GO VOLS.
          • Apr 2006
          • 4266

          #19
          Originally posted by AirAssault
          To believe that what we do on this ball called Earth does nothing to effect it is just STUPID. Air doesnot escape, Co2 emmisions just don't simply disapear. An eco system can only take so much. The Earth does pendulum back and forth between warmer/colder times, but they can test the air from hundreds of thousands of years back (air locked in ice, pulled out from core drilling) and tell that it is worse off today then years ago. To simply dismiss something that could have major impact on generations to come is not only dumb but in typical American fashion, arrogant. Most other industrialized countries are taking steps to limit their impact on the Earth, but not the mighty Americans, we do what we want because we can.

          It's a joke, the retarded way a lot of Americans think is a joke, and one day we will reap what we sow. To bad it won't be any of the nimrods alive today, but our childrens children that have to fix our mess. Plus, even if it is all fooey and we are just crazy, what does it matter. Why is it so bad to get away from fossil fuels? We are in a war for fossil fuels, we pay out the nose for fossil fuels, we are a SLAVE to other countries because of fossil fuels. The trillions spent over the last 30/40 years could of been put to developing alternative forms of fuel, but of course the big wigs in Detroit, California, and other states/cities that produce vehicles that rely on the combustion engine didn't want to hurt their bottom line. Of course there are the oil companies that cry and whine how production cost more so they have to charge more, yet are pulling in RECORD PROFITS each and every quarter.

          So, if you don't belive in global warmin, how about you become more energy efficient so we don't have to fight wars, shape our foreign policy, and bow down to countries that don't like us. (remember, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were from our good buddy Saudi Arabia). Also, how about people that poo poo GW stop being selfish jerks and think about the future generations of this country, its not all about YOU. Of course if Americans actaully thought about others instead of just ourselves, our heads might explode.
          Do you seriously believe this stuff? You seem like an inteligent human being. Please tell me that Hillary, Barak Osoma Bin Laden or whatever his name is, or Al has stolen your login password.

          Did you ever hear about "war of the worlds" It happend 50 yrs ago or so (Dont feel like googling it). Anyways what happened is Everyone believed the world was coming to an end because of a radio station prank. It was to get more listeners. The drive by media today is doing the same thing. America is not producing half as much emmissions today as they did in the 60s. 90% of the crap that is told to you is people who know nothing about the subject.

          Comment

          • Mechanic79
            Whatever, I do what I want

            • Jul 2001
            • 666

            #20
            So the end justifies the mean?

            That is what the problem is.

            Let's base FACT from only a theory!

            Rediculous...


            I've heard that Global Earth Weather/Temp. is mainly due to how the earth's magnetic poles reflect the sun's radiation. It's all about rare earth magnets...
            Last edited by Mechanic79; 11-22-2007, 09:17 AM.

            Mechanic79's FeedBack

            Comment

            • don miguel
              the legend
              • Sep 2006
              • 1141

              #21
              mabe it all went to vermont? oh right, It did. Good thing Im here for 4 days.

              Comment

              • wjr
                Registered User
                • Feb 2006
                • 995

                #22
                Originally posted by MANN
                Do you seriously believe this stuff? You seem like an inteligent human being. Please tell me that Hillary, Barak Osoma Bin Laden or whatever his name is, or Al has stolen your login password.

                Did you ever hear about "war of the worlds" It happend 50 yrs ago or so (Dont feel like googling it). Anyways what happened is Everyone believed the world was coming to an end because of a radio station prank. It was to get more listeners. The drive by media today is doing the same thing. America is not producing half as much emmissions today as they did in the 60s. 90% of the crap that is told to you is people who know nothing about the subject.

                You can read the IPCC reports right from their websites. Straight from the horses mouth, no politicians or sensationalist media involved. And they're saying the evidence is conclusive.


                As for the co2 emissions being greater in the 1960's, that's simply not true. Every chart you'll look at will agree with me. Maybe other forms of pollution were more prevalent, but not greenhouse gas emissions.

                Comment

                • MANN
                  I am in TN. GO VOLS.
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 4266

                  #23
                  Originally posted by wjr
                  As for the co2 emissions being greater in the 1960's, that's simply not true. Every chart you'll look at will agree with me. Maybe other forms of pollution were more prevalent, but not greenhouse gas emissions.
                  Water is a green house gas. Looks that we are making more water these days.

                  I am willing to bet pink slips that Global Warming is a cycle, and one we have not affected with our cars/factorys.

                  Comment

                  • Army
                    Moderator of DOOOOOOOOMMM!

                    • Oct 2000
                    • 5785

                    #24
                    Once more, I must ask:

                    What's so bad about palm trees in Nova Scotia?

                    People equate "global warming" with a desert scenario. Seems to me, that humidity levels would rise, creating green zones in places that last saw greenery....during the last warming period.

                    There are trees beneath the Sahara sands. A forested Sudan would not be a bad thing.

                    If anyone thinks we are putting out more pollutants into the air, simply needs to look at pictures of the Los Angeles basin from the late 60's and 70's....well, at least those parts you COULD see through all the smog. Now, the mountains can be seen from the beaches. This with the population of the LA area nearly doubled since then. More cars, more industry....less pollution.

                    I love how the "scientist" poo-poo the Co2 emissions from volcanic activity. "Oh, well that's natural Co2, and chlorine, and other acids that is spewed many thousands of feet into the atmosphere. It can't reach and destroy the ozone layer like the man-made Co2, or chlorine, or other acids that are emitted at sea level. I'm a "scientist" see, you have to believe me, Al Gore said so".

                    Comment

                    • drg
                      Half-cocked
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 1112

                      #25
                      View my feedback here

                      Comment

                      • skife
                        Unregistered User
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 2769

                        #26
                        okay...

                        the law of conservation of mass states that matter can't be destroyed or created only re arranged.

                        so doesn't that mean that all the pollution is already here, we're just moving it from the ground to the air?




                        [21:00] < FunkTehChillinMunky > I've got a Warped Sportz Dark Talon

                        Comment

                        • wjr
                          Registered User
                          • Feb 2006
                          • 995

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Army
                          Once more, I must ask:

                          What's so bad about palm trees in Nova Scotia?

                          People equate "global warming" with a desert scenario. Seems to me, that humidity levels would rise, creating green zones in places that last saw greenery....during the last warming period.

                          There are trees beneath the Sahara sands. A forested Sudan would not be a bad thing.

                          If anyone thinks we are putting out more pollutants into the air, simply needs to look at pictures of the Los Angeles basin from the late 60's and 70's....well, at least those parts you COULD see through all the smog. Now, the mountains can be seen from the beaches. This with the population of the LA area nearly doubled since then. More cars, more industry....less pollution.

                          I love how the "scientist" poo-poo the Co2 emissions from volcanic activity. "Oh, well that's natural Co2, and chlorine, and other acids that is spewed many thousands of feet into the atmosphere. It can't reach and destroy the ozone layer like the man-made Co2, or chlorine, or other acids that are emitted at sea level. I'm a "scientist" see, you have to believe me, Al Gore said so".
                          With temperature rise you'll also see an increase in tropical disease. I don't want to go ahead and blame katrina and recent hurricanes on global warming, but if the temperature does rise then severe storms like that will be more prevalent.

                          Those are just two I picked up off the top of my head. If you research it you can find lots articles discussing the effects of climate change.

                          And I had never heard about the idea of volcanoes releasing signifigant amounts of co2 into the air... are you positive about that? I just read a few different places saying man made co2 emissions were much higher... 150 times higher.

                          Comment

                          • MANN
                            I am in TN. GO VOLS.
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 4266

                            #28
                            Originally posted by wjr
                            With temperature rise you'll also see an increase in tropical disease. I don't want to go ahead and blame katrina and recent hurricanes on global warming, but if the temperature does rise then severe storms like that will be more prevalent.
                            All we heard after Katrina is that Global warming is causing hurricanes blah blah blah we are going to have the worst hurricane season EVAR, blah, blah, blah. What has happened since that? nothing. If global warming does cause more severe storms, and we are not getting more severe storms then doesnt that mean that we are not having global warming?

                            Comment

                            • MoeMag
                              Still here.
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 1821

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Army
                              There are trees beneath the Sahara sands. A forested Sudan would not be a bad thing.

                              Comment

                              • devildog
                                I hate my user name
                                • Oct 2002
                                • 1530

                                #30
                                Originally posted by wjr
                                And I had never heard about the idea of volcanoes releasing signifigant amounts of co2 into the air... are you positive about that? I just read a few different places saying man made co2 emissions were much higher... 150 times higher.
                                one volcano eruption puts more pullutants in the air than all manmade pollution to date combined.
                                Zaszczycają waszą ojczyznę

                                just got back from iraq!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...