Originally posted by zondo
I've come to two conclusions. The first being that I think you're less interested in having a discussion, and more interested in touting your opinion as truth and everything else as stupidity. If I'm wrong I apologize, but that's the impression I'm getting.
The second is that either I'm not being clear in my arguments, or you're ignoring my point completely (And again if that's not the case I offer my apologies.).
My point is this:
If you're a gang-banger pushing drugs and you need "x" amount of people to sell, and "x" amount of people to defend your territory then I seriously doubt you care who they are or where they're from as long as they get the job done.
If you somehow magically get rid of every illegal alien it won't change the fact that "x" people are still needed. And when there are no illegal aliens left you have to fill those positions with... US citizens. If you secure the borders and get rid of all drug imports they'll start producing them in the US.
I'm not arguing about border security, the need of, the lack of, etc. My point is that I don't think it will do anything in the long run. It might cause a short term decrease as gangs recruit new members and new sources of drugs (or what have you) are found or created. The amount of gang members may decrease slightly, but in the long run the people who head the gangs want money and they'll do what they have to in order to get money whether we have secure borders or not.
If you want to get rid of gangs a secure border is not the solution IMHO. It's a feel better solution that will do exactly what? It will replace criminals from abroad with criminals from home, drugs from abroad with drugs from home. I guess I can't honestly see how it will cause a real noticeable decrease in gang activity.
If you want to see a decrease in gang activity I think that more after-school programs, social improvements, and people in prison would be a much more effective, and helpful step than securing the borders...



Comment