changing the rules

[busby]

http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/42323/570237.html

[Tracy_ptp]

It's the only way they know how to get it done!!! They seem to think they don't have to play by the same rules as everyone else!!!

[drg]

Changing for the better. I realize that puts Republicans at a disadvantage, but right is right. Disenfranchisement is inexcusable.

[maniacmechanic]

Changing for the better. I realize that puts Republicans at a disadvantage, but right is right. Disenfranchisement is inexcusable.

at you , not with you

[busby]

project vote

http://biggovernment.com/kolson/2010/04/02/frances-fox-piven-joins-board-of-project-vote-what-could-go-wrong/

[teufelhunden]

Changing for the better. I realize that puts Republicans at a disadvantage, but right is right. Disenfranchisement is inexcusable.

People would have to be "enfranchisable" (yes, I created a word) for them to be disenfranchised. Out of state voters, unregistered voters, dead voters (I live in NJ, thousands of dead people vote every year, nearly all for the democrats), etc. can not be disenfranchised because they are lacking the right to vote. Non-citizens, too.

[Frizzle Fry]

University IDs? Increased mailing of ballots?

[SCpoloRicker]

Changing for the better. I realize that puts Republicans at a disadvantage, but right is right. Disenfranchisement is inexcusable.

We should bring back the landowner requirement for voting.

/kidding, but still somewhat serious