Changing the terms to civil union is a good way to go about it. That way, religion is out of it. Marriage is a religious thing. States/provinces/countries have just adopted it because the majority of people in power were religious. That is changing, and specific religions have less of an impact on daily life. The law has to be more generic so that all religions can coexist, but basic human rights can be protected, even if it doesn't represent the majority. Gay marriage doesn't need to be performed by any religion that does not support it. Thats fine. Religions have their rules. However, civil unions need to be accepted because governments should legislate protection for everyone and allow their freedom to choose.
Marriage and gay rights are very similar to the debates about slavery. Just because the majority of society accepted slavery and blacks did not have any rights because the majority of voters where white, didn't make it right. Gay marriage is the same. Many don't agree with it, but we don't need to. We do need to accept it though.
As for sexual harassment and the right to kick someone in the nuts for being propositioned. Think about it from an equal rights perspective. If you proposition a woman, then she has a right to do the same. That would just be bad for all us guys, giving women the right to inflict harm on guys just for asking.
Marriage and gay rights are very similar to the debates about slavery. Just because the majority of society accepted slavery and blacks did not have any rights because the majority of voters where white, didn't make it right. Gay marriage is the same. Many don't agree with it, but we don't need to. We do need to accept it though.
As for sexual harassment and the right to kick someone in the nuts for being propositioned. Think about it from an equal rights perspective. If you proposition a woman, then she has a right to do the same. That would just be bad for all us guys, giving women the right to inflict harm on guys just for asking.




Comment