So...How's it going?

[Loguzzzzzz]

Who said anything about more government? This is the government doing it's job. Though farmers are growing the food, it is also their choice and sometimes their demand to grow crops that require a high demand for water, which is a limited resource in that area. So instead of understanding what the area can support, those farmers pigheadedly, choose to use more water than the area supports? 2ho needs the food they grow when there are no people to eat it?



The water supply has changed. When the area is in a drought warning, that means that water needs to be rationed. When something is rationed, it is not because there is an abundance, it means that demand outweighs the supply.



Why do you say that the people are less productive than the farmer? Why are you pre-judging any of this? And why even think that the government is only doing this to make money off the people? What a stupid statement.



Oh yes, all those farmers in Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, etc; suffer the same treatment. It's like no one likes farmers anymore.



Over simplify much? Ever look at the various exceptions to water usage from places like golf courses, hotels with pools, and even residents with pools? Again, when there is a finite resource, just because you want to do something, doesn't mean that you have to.



Well, if the crops can't go out and vote, it's not the people's fault.

To quote Saturday Night Live / Dan Aykroyd, "Jane (Doug) you ignorant slut!".

There you go again, prognosticating on things you know little of.
Where's the drought? Not here in California or probably Texas...
California Water

Everything you posted here is "FAIL"

[Nobody]

There you go again, prognosticating on things you know little of.
Where's the drought? Not here in California or probably Texas...
California Water

Everything you posted here is "FAIL"

You read so little. Never said that Ca. was in a drought, but per the article, they're talking about drought conditions. So, once again, how is that reading comprehension or are you going to blame this on not having your readers?

[Loguzzzzzz]

You read so little. Never said that Ca. was in a drought, but per the article, they're talking about drought conditions. So, once again, how is that reading comprehension or are you going to blame this on not having your readers?

I read it, you must read every third word. I didn't say you said California, I asked you where the drought was, mentioning that California is not in a drought condition. Did you miss that or were you reading every third word again.....
...and you challenge my reading comprehension???
Laughable

[Pyrate Jim]

Couple of cute ones, first to the college campus situation. This is how you deal with them;

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/contractor-sprays-paint-in-faces-of-gaza-college-protesters-while-covering-up-a-pro-palestine-mural/ar-BB1m6BLs?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=6ece090b84664d96bca6ae2798113d29&ei=17

Now, I don't care if it's paint or bullets but once the trigger is pulled, when you jump in front of the spraygun...You're asking to get painted.

And this one, a Joe Biden interview on CNN;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50IRZ054D0

At about five minutes into this "response" the President claims that the inflation rate the day he took office was nine percent. And repeated it. In a CNN interview.
C'mon, Joe! Americans have an (admittedly unreasonable) expectation that a President will tell them the truth. Telling lies is inherent to politics, but there is a threshold above which citizens will not abide.

[Nobody]

And this one, a Joe Biden interview on CNN;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50IRZ054D0

At about five minutes into this "response" the President claims that the inflation rate the day he took office was nine percent. And repeated it. In a CNN interview.
C'mon, Joe! Americans have an (admittedly unreasonable) expectation that a President will tell them the truth. Telling lies is inherent to politics, but there is a threshold above which citizens will not abide.

I find that funny. Either you have no mirrors(political ones) or you were born a few days ago.

I say that because of the 4 years of the trump admin and subsequent years since. Here is a man that has lied about everything.

Infrastructure week
New healthcare system to replace Obama care
How tall he is
His weight
His taxes
Not taking donor money for campaigns
Caring about the American worker
January 6th
The election

Need I go on? Cause, maybe Biden got the number wrong. Maybe he lied about it. All I know is that a Biden lie is way less damaging than a trump truth.

[Pyrate Jim]

All I know is that a Biden lie is way less damaging than a trump truth.

I should have realized you would prefer one man's lies over another man's truth.
After all, you've already admitted to telling lies here merely to promote yourself.

Tell me, why is it that Trump has never been charged with insurrection over January 6th?

[Nobody]

Tell me, why is it that Trump has never been charged with insurrection over January 6th?

I don't know. I can't keep up with all the numerous courtcases, whether they are state, federal or what they are covering in the multitude of serious charges against him. All I know is, those lawyers know what and how to do their jobs and other than how llong it's taking, the wheels of justice are still moving slowly. I guess if you don't want to be associated with criminal types, don't surround yourself with people doing crimes.

[Pyrate Jim]

I don't know. I can't keep up with all the numerous courtcases, whether they are state, federal or what they are covering in the multitude of serious charges against him.

Really? I find that an odd statement since you seem to have pretty strong opinions about them. Let me get you up to speed.
The Jan 6th case brought by special counsel Jack Smith is currently hung up in the Supreme Court over Presidential Immunity.
Federal Judge Eileen Canon has postponed the documents case indefinitely.
Fani Willis messed up in the Georgia case and appeals court is now reviewing that before proceeding.
And the NY "hush money" case? You would think that for the first time ever prosecution of a President of the United States we would have serious people bringing forth serious facts and serious charges.
Instead, we have a porn star, a perjurer, a DA in ill-fitting suits, a Judge with appearances of impropriety and bias, a vague and as yet undisclosed criminal charge, and a Pecker.

[Nobody]

Really? I find that an odd statement since you seem to have pretty strong opinions about them. Let me get you up to speed.

Sorry for thinking on my own and not sharing a single brain cell that says that trump will fix everything.

The Jan 6th case brought by special counsel Jack Smith is currently hung up in the Supreme Court over Presidential Immunity.

But not dead. I feel that SCOTUS, in order to not give a statement to either side, has come up with the strategy of of they don't make a judgment, then there is no question of partisanship. But no matter what, the time will come when the delays will run out and they will have to rule.

Federal Judge Eileen Canon has postponed the documents case indefinitely.

Indefinitely but not permanently. While the weakest judicial, not substantive, case, it is full of questionable actions done by judge Cannon. So while justice delayed is justice denied, it like the case in front of SCOTUS, will come to terms soon enough.

Fani Willis messed up in the Georgia case and appeals court is now reviewing that before proceeding.

But it is not delayed on any count. To attack everything but the case itself is not a show of innocence, IMHO. So trying to remove the DA, is a viable strategy, it does nothing about the case itself. And since this is still a state case, no matter what Trump does, he can't stop it from happening.

And the NY "hush money" case? You would think that for the first time ever prosecution of a President of the United States we would have serious people bringing forth serious facts and serious charges.
Instead, we have a porn star, a perjurer, a DA in ill-fitting suits, a Judge with appearances of impropriety and bias, a vague and as yet undisclosed criminal charge, and a Pecker.

Ok, I hate the name "Hush Money", as that act has nothing to do with the actual crime and thus gives a false identifier as paying hush money is not a crime.

The funny thing is, adultery is a crime. In fact it is against the law in New York as well as 15 other states. As I read it, it is more towards civil cases and not state. But that is not part of thr indictment.

The actual crime is falsifying business records, which doesn't sound that serious, except when it*becomes a felony*if the defendant falsified the records with the intent of furthering a separate underlying crime. That underlying crime is of course election fraud. Sidenote, it is sweet irony that the only election frauds found have been committed by republicans,

As much as you might want "serious people", you can't pick who is brought to trial/court. So the cast of characters is merely who was involved in the crime. So have no fear, those charges are serious. The possibility of jail time is as serious as it gets. And I see the NY case as, a sum of it's parts do not equal the whole. Adultery is not a state or federal crime. Paying hush money isn't a crime. Adultery is a crime but the state is not the aggrieved party. Falsifying records is a crime within the State, and Falsifying business records in an election is a federal crime.

I guess we all just want a better class of political representation.

[Pyrate Jim]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjYR1I0RNCc

[Nobody]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjYR1I0RNCc

Let me guess. Did he pay the bill for his rally? Cause the last one, he seemed to stiff the convention center on the extra security. How do I know this, cause it happened where I live.

[Tunaman]

Let me guess. Did he pay the bill for his rally? Cause the last one, he seemed to stiff the convention center on the extra security. How do I know this, cause it happened where I live.

He had his convention under a bridge?

[Pyrate Jim]

Adultery is not a state or federal crime. Paying hush money isn't a crime. Adultery is a crime but the state is not the aggrieved party.

So, which is it? In a single paragraph you say adultery both is and it isn't a crime. Make up your mind.

[Nobody]

So, which is it? In a single paragraph you say adultery both is and it isn't a crime. Make up your mind.

Some states adultery is a crime. It ranges from a misdemeanor with a fine to jail time. It is up to the state to pursue or not pursue/prove that adultery should be prosecuted. But in trump's case, it is not part of the indictment.

But morally, it is a crime against the vows to the woman that you are married to.

I would figure that after all the self research that people put into their cures on covid, constitution law and the truth of vaccinations, that you would also do a simple search of is adultery a crime.

[Nobody]

Huh, in addition to the near 500 million in money due on the fraud and defamation lawsuits; news reporting has found that trump could owe another additional 100mil in overdue taxes.

All this is happening when Biden has done the same thing that trump was empeached for, withholding arms to Israel. People leaving his rally early in Wildwood, while he was talking and Michael Cohen laying out how the crime happened in the Hush Money case. Guess this is not trump's week