So...How's it going?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Loguzzzzzz
    Practice Target

    • Sep 2004
    • 2121

    #1231
    Originally posted by CitsejaMkraDehT
    cool.

    Ya know for a guy who quotes the bible a lot... seems very contradictory to vote for an adulterer.

    Nevermind that he's a felon, fraud, con man, divorcee, hate monger....

    https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/migr...age-acceptance
    Did you vote for Bill Clinton?
    ......You know you want one!!

    Comment

    • Nobody
      Nobody's Perfect
      • Oct 2001
      • 3384

      #1232
      Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
      Did you vote for Bill Clinton?
      Try not living in the past and wondering of someone voted for a president 30 years ago.

      But why don't you tell us who you voted for in 92? Was it Bush or Perot? How about 96, were you all in on Bob Dole?

      Comment

      • Loguzzzzzz
        Practice Target

        • Sep 2004
        • 2121

        #1233
        Originally posted by Nobody
        Try not living in the past and wondering of someone voted for a president 30 years ago.

        But why don't you tell us who you voted for in 92? Was it Bush or Perot? How about 96, were you all in on Bob Dole?
        He was referring to adulterers in reference to Trump so I responded in kind, are you too stupid to figure that out?
        Voted for Bush. Here's a clue, I didn't vote for Bill Clinton although I don't think he did a bad job even with all the republican party crap that went on. Just like Donald J. Trump, the 45th president with all the crap that the BLUE people threw at him.
        ......You know you want one!!

        Comment

        • Loguzzzzzz
          Practice Target

          • Sep 2004
          • 2121

          #1234
          Nobody = Mister Bucket the Bridge Troll
          ......You know you want one!!

          Comment

          • Nobody
            Nobody's Perfect
            • Oct 2001
            • 3384

            #1235
            Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
            He was referring to adulterers in reference to Trump so I responded in kind, are you too stupid to figure that out?
            Voted for Bush. Here's a clue, I didn't vote for Bill Clinton although I don't think he did a bad job even with all the republican party crap that went on. Just like Donald J. Trump, the 45th president with all the crap that the BLUE people threw at him.
            Well, Clinton did balance the budget and had market growth, which Bush turned into a recession, which Obama turned around and handed a booming economy that trump trashed, that Biden turned around in fewer years.

            I didn't care about the adultery, as I have no morals being a godless heathen, liberal tree-hugger, so the mere fact that Bill stepped out does not concern me. As long as they get the job done, that is the bottom line. But before you twist your panties up, Clinton is not nor ever claimed he was a saint. Yet, the republicans, who shield themselves with the moral blankets of being better, happen to point fingers at those adulterous, while clutching their pearls.

            Which means what? Does adultery mean anything, or is it only useful when you can use it as a cudgel against your opponent? So, if trump did no wrong being on Epstein's plane, then neither did Trump being on Epstein's island/mansion.

            The biggest difference is that fact that trump misused campaign funds, and got caught, and then went to trial where he was found guilty.

            Comment

            • CitsejaMkraDehT
              Registered User
              • May 2007
              • 135

              #1236
              Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
              Did you vote for Bill Clinton?
              I'm not the one championing some sort of religious high road here.

              No I did not vote for Bill Clinton, wasn't anywhere old enough to vote for him.
              Last edited by CitsejaMkraDehT; 11-19-2024, 08:22 AM.

              Comment

              • Loguzzzzzz
                Practice Target

                • Sep 2004
                • 2121

                #1237
                Originally posted by CitsejaMkraDehT
                I'm not the one championing some sort of religious high road here.

                No I did not vote for Bill Clinton, wasn't anywhere old enough to vote for him.
                You should really get off your soapbox. Do you live in a glass house, or are you too young to understand the reference?

                Even Adam and Eve even had the original sin if you believe in the Old Testament. If you don't then IDK maybe you an atheist or agnostic at which point we have not established your morality so maybe your opinion is important only to you.
                Last edited by Loguzzzzzz; 11-19-2024, 10:07 AM.
                ......You know you want one!!

                Comment

                • Loguzzzzzz
                  Practice Target

                  • Sep 2004
                  • 2121

                  #1238
                  Originally posted by Nobody
                  Well, Clinton did balance the budget and had market growth, which Bush turned into a recession, which Obama turned around and handed a booming economy that trump trashed, that Biden turned around in fewer years.

                  I didn't care about the adultery, as I have no morals being a godless heathen, liberal tree-hugger, so the mere fact that Bill stepped out does not concern me. As long as they get the job done, that is the bottom line. But before you twist your panties up, Clinton is not nor ever claimed he was a saint. Yet, the republicans, who shield themselves with the moral blankets of being better, happen to point fingers at those adulterous, while clutching their pearls.

                  Which means what? Does adultery mean anything, or is it only useful when you can use it as a cudgel against your opponent? So, if trump did no wrong being on Epstein's plane, then neither did Trump being on Epstein's island/mansion.

                  The biggest difference is that fact that trump misused campaign funds, and got caught, and then went to trial where he was found guilty.
                  Don't even start with Epstein. Bill Clinton had many trips on the Lolita Express along with many others. According to YOUR news Trump was on the plane but there is no evidence that he was ever at the island. If he had been it would have been all over YOUR MSM.

                  If you believe that Epstein committed suicide then you are even more stupid and gullible than I thought. He was "silenced" because he knew all the dirt on some very important high level people. Donald Trump on the plane pales by comparison.
                  ......You know you want one!!

                  Comment

                  • Nobody
                    Nobody's Perfect
                    • Oct 2001
                    • 3384

                    #1239
                    Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
                    Don't even start with Epstein. Bill Clinton had many trips on the Lolita Express along with many others. According to YOUR news Trump was on the plane but there is no evidence that he was ever at the island. If he had been it would have been all over YOUR MSM.

                    If you believe that Epstein committed suicide then you are even more stupid and gullible than I thought. He was "silenced" because he knew all the dirt on some very important high level people. Donald Trump on the plane pales by comparison.
                    Lol, according to my news? How about the videos of trump with Jeffrey gawking at the various women? There is no question that both people where or had been on the plane. The question is, on how much time they had spent at Epstein's dens of disrespute.

                    But that is problem. You believe that trump is so innocent that, though he had been associated with him that there is no way he could have possibly done anything wrong or illegal. Yet, Clinton who had never denied using the plane, HAD to have done anything and everything there and is guilty by mere association. It is the same story by both, yet you want to lock Clinton(BOTH Clintons) up without any evidence. I want to believe Bill did nothing but I am not naive enough that he is innocent. But I do know, from previous acts of evasion, that trump has more to hide, cause he hides everything.

                    As for the suicide/murder? Sure, it is probable that he was silenced because he had too much dirt on a bunch of people that didn't want anything to come out, But who had more to loose? Would a retired former president loose more than a British Royal, or even a presidential(at the time) candidate?

                    I will say that trump had nothing to do with Epstein's death, owing to the fact that trump can't keep his mouth shut and he is so damn cheap that the news would have come out. But you are naive imbecile to think that trump didn't profit more from his death than anyone in the news today.

                    Comment

                    • Nobody
                      Nobody's Perfect
                      • Oct 2001
                      • 3384

                      #1240


                      Video from 1992, before Clinton became president. Makes you wonder how one NY socialite didn't know another NY socialite?

                      Comment

                      • Loguzzzzzz
                        Practice Target

                        • Sep 2004
                        • 2121

                        #1241
                        Originally posted by Nobody
                        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AUDr_c2PalI

                        Video from 1992, before Clinton became president. Makes you wonder how one NY socialite didn't know another NY socialite?
                        If you read further into their friendship, Donald Trump admitted to know him and being friends. Once the pedophile thing came up he banned him from Mar Lago.
                        ......You know you want one!!

                        Comment

                        • CitsejaMkraDehT
                          Registered User
                          • May 2007
                          • 135

                          #1242
                          Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
                          You should really get off your soapbox. Do you live in a glass house, or are you too young to understand the reference?

                          Even Adam and Eve even had the original sin if you believe in the Old Testament. If you don't then IDK maybe you an atheist or agnostic at which point we have not established your morality so maybe your opinion is important only to you.
                          You're consistent I'll give you that, but it's just constant whataboutisms that have nothing to do with the original point.

                          The republican party as I'm sure going_home identifies with, consistently berates the "radical left" and how they are the party of values.

                          I honestly don't care what people say or write when they do the counter opposite of their belief system when it comes to voting or enacting policies that go against what they think they believe.

                          Comment

                          • CitsejaMkraDehT
                            Registered User
                            • May 2007
                            • 135

                            #1243
                            In regards to Project 2025 you guys have shown yet again that you believe a wolf in sheep's clothes.

                            Donald Trump tried to distance himself from the Project 2025 plan during his campaign, but sources say one of its top architects may get a top administration post.




                            This was a project of more than 100 organizations to prepare for a new conservative administration through policy, training, and personnel.



                            You guys are so gullible. As they say 'a fool and his money shall soon part' but in this case it won't just be your money.

                            Comment

                            • Nobody
                              Nobody's Perfect
                              • Oct 2001
                              • 3384

                              #1244
                              Originally posted by Loguzzzzzz
                              If you read further into their friendship, Donald Trump admitted to know him and being friends. Once the pedophile thing came up he banned him from Mar Lago.
                              Lol, talk about revisionist history. Did trump distance himself from him after the last charges or was it the first charges that a certain Florida district attorney happen to dismiss because he knew all the players?

                              But what is even more funny is that you are wanting to cover for the man, that it is equally a stain upon you as it is for the character of Donald trump. Do I care if Clinton gets wrapped up in any charges? Not really, as I can separate the man from general politics and what he had done. Do I believe that Epstein more than likely approached the Clintons after his presidency, and wanted to shmooze with a former president for clought and anything he could get? Absolutely. Has anyone brought any accusations against Clinton in that time or in conjunction with Epstein. Nope. Again, I hope he didn't but we may never know.

                              So, you either have to paint trump with the same brush as Clinton for his association with Epstein or you have to face facts that trump is a felon, and that he was tried and convicted in a civil trial of sexual misconduct. All Clinton got was some oral in the Oval Office and an impeachment that increased his popularity.

                              Comment

                              • Loguzzzzzz
                                Practice Target

                                • Sep 2004
                                • 2121

                                #1245
                                Originally posted by Nobody
                                Lol, talk about revisionist history. Did trump distance himself from him after the last charges or was it the first charges that a certain Florida district attorney happen to dismiss because he knew all the players?

                                But what is even more funny is that you are wanting to cover for the man, that it is equally a stain upon you as it is for the character of Donald trump. Do I care if Clinton gets wrapped up in any charges? Not really, as I can separate the man from general politics and what he had done. Do I believe that Epstein more than likely approached the Clintons after his presidency, and wanted to shmooze with a former president for clought and anything he could get? Absolutely. Has anyone brought any accusations against Clinton in that time or in conjunction with Epstein. Nope. Again, I hope he didn't but we may never know.

                                So, you either have to paint trump with the same brush as Clinton for his association with Epstein or you have to face facts that trump is a felon, and that he was tried and convicted in a civil trial of sexual misconduct. All Clinton got was some oral in the Oval Office and an impeachment that increased his popularity.
                                You make up this garbage as you go, everything you stated above is conjecture based on your perspective. You have no idea of any of the timelines and think you are so smart that you won't even bother to look. This makes you look foolish and just propagates your continued misinformation.
                                ......You know you want one!!

                                Comment

                                Working...