So...How's it going?

[Pyrate Jim]

Well, a quick Google search tells me that the head of USAID is Marco Rubio. So either you are calling Rubio a girl, it's not who you were referring to(hence why you FAILED to spell it out for us dumbies) or it was some backhanded comment about trump, not only calling him a female, but alos agreeing that be is corrupt..

Once again you prove that you do not read what is written.

And the head of USAID increasing her wealth by nearly 23 million in four years under Biden with a salary of $188,000.

Marco Rubio has been Chair of USAID for a total of twelve days, under Trump. Not for four years, and not under Biden.
So your answer is nothing more than obfuscation. I asked one thing, you came back with something completely unrelated.
You really should try to keep track of the conversation instead of spouting the first thing google shows you and claiming you suddenly own the only truth.

This one is fun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPmRD-TI9m8

Do you think Zelenski would have said that about Harris?

[Loguzzzzzz]

Oh how I love how I have to prove a positive, yet you never have to prove a negative. So how about this, YOU prove to me that he didn't. You give a believable and reputable source as your proof and then you can say something. Otherwise, no John, I am not gaslighted you, I am telling you a truth that you don't like, that you disbelieve. The problem is, you are fed so much tripe that you can no longer tell truth from fiction. So come on, put your money where your mouth is. So links please.

Now, if the trump admin is all about not spending, why is it that the new budget for the next year, is raising the budget, not by 1, not by 2 or 3, but 4 trillion? Granted, it is a proposal, but makes you wonder how distant trump's talking points are to the actual truth?
https://coloradonewsline.com/2025/02...ends-tax-cuts/

The burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. Mr. Civic 101!

[going_home]

Where is the accountability? .

Its what the left is fighting so hard to end.

Everyday DOGE is finding where the bodies are buried, they are going to find out how a DC-ite making 188k a year is somehow worth millions, and there are thousands like that.

The DC grifters are running scared, as well they should be.

https://pjmedia.com/lincolnbrown/2025/02/13/maxine-waters-we-dont-know-what-they-have-on-us-n4936944

Numbers 32:23 .....and be sure your sin will find you out.

[Pyrate Jim]

Reminds me of a quote I had to go back and look up to get it right.

Any government will work if authority and accountability are equal and coordinate. This does not insure "good" government; it simply insures that it will work.
But such governments are rare - most people want to run thing but want no part of the blame.
This used to be called the "backseat-driver syndrome"

From the notebooks of Lazarus Long.

[Nobody]

The burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. Mr. Civic 101!

Ah John, you are the accuser, not me, who is the accused in this scenario. You accuse me of lying but not proving that I lied, other than what's left of your reputation. So, bring the receipts.

[Nobody]

Its what the left is fighting so hard to end.

Everyday DOGE is finding where the bodies are buried, they are going to find out how a DC-ite making 188k a year is somehow worth millions, and there are thousands like that.

The DC grifters are running scared, as well they should be.

https://pjmedia.com/lincolnbrown/2025/02/13/maxine-waters-we-dont-know-what-they-have-on-us-n4936944

Numbers 32:23 .....and be sure your sin will find you out.

The best thief, is the one who is running the investigation trying to find the thief.

There is no proof, just accusations from someone who suspect, in iBible. Love how you attached yourself to people that have not helped you in anyway, that tell you that they are using you, and you ask for more. Cult much?

How about judge not, lest ye be judged? Think that is somewhere in the bible.

[Nobody]

Once again you prove that you do not read what is written.



Marco Rubio has been Chair of USAID for a total of twelve days, under Trump. Not for four years, and not under Biden.
So your answer is nothing more than obfuscation. I asked one thing, you came back with something completely unrelated.
You really should try to keep track of the conversation instead of spouting the first thing google shows you and claiming you suddenly own the only truth.

This one is fun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPmRD-TI9m8

Do you think Zelenski would have said that about Harris?

Going with Loguzzzzzzo here and prove to me what you are saying should be believed.

Whomever you are talking about is literally not in what you wrote and I don't care to Google it. For I believe that these accusations will amount to the same result of the 18 month Biden investigation on bribery and impeachment, which remind me found what? How many indictments did Biden get? And why hasn't Biden been dragged in front of DOJ to face all the charges of being such a corrupt and despicable fraudster?

[Pyrate Jim]

Whomever you are talking about is literally not in what you wrote and I don't care to Google it.

That right there is a flat out lie. I wrote the name twice and provided two different links.

You mean those protected under Bidens pre-emptive pardons? As if they need protection from something not yet exposed?
The whole issue with Samantha Power may be a case in point.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/elon-musk-announces-investigations-into-bureaucrats-that-have-become-wealthy-despite-modest-fed-salaries/ar-AA1z07zx?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=3095feb23a9c4f5af5e935ab95a5478a&ei=158

Or this one ~ You have to get to 9:35 into the video before Samantha Power is actually brought up. I might add that this Mike Benz person being interviewed is not what I would call "collected" in his statements in the overall interview, regardless of his credentials. It's the interview host who points it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpPxpMA-oTs

So despite your refusal to admit the truth, I did quite literally post the name.
And here is a third link. Just so you don't strain your google.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B1m5_j0l_w

Your credibility is sinking fast.

[Nobody]

That right there is a flat out lie. I wrote the name twice and provided two different links.



So despite your refusal to admit the truth, I did quite literally post the name.
And here is a third link. Just so you don't strain your google.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B1m5_j0l_w

Your credibility is sinking fast.

Opph, b3g to differ. That name was not in the direct quote. That was in another post. Who is to understand that what you wrote days before, that it is the same reference too? We are not mind readers, and I definitely do not click on any YouTube links(it would interfere with my own algorithm on YT). So, instead of getting all butthurt, take a moment to actually reference yourself and write the name. As that is an excellent way to make sure who or what you are talking about is being understood. You know, communication skills. I am holding anywhere from 2 to 5 sub-threads in this one post. H3nce why I direct quote, as a lot will get lost in the chaff, as it were. So don't blame me, blame yourself. I am not the fool here

[Beemer]

Your credibility is sinking fast.

What credibility??

Over the course of President Trump’s four years in office, the gross national debt grew from $19.95 trillion to $27.75 trillion – a $7.8 trillion increase. However, much of this borrowing was due to policies put in place before President Trump took office or due to unexpected changes in circumstance.

https://www.crfb.org/blogs/how-much-did-president-trump-add-debt

The national debt increased by around $8.4 trillion during Biden's four years in office

https://www.investopedia.com/us-debt-by-president-dollar-and-percentage-7371225#toc-top-5-presidents-who-added-to-the-national-debt-by-percentage

I am not the fool here

I beg to differ.

Ah John, you are the accuser, not me, who is the accused in this scenario. You accuse me of lying but not proving that I lied, other than what's left of your reputation. So, bring the receipts.

Why do you keep posting a lie. I already proved you wrong. Trump DID NOT DOUBLE, DOUBLE THE DEPT.

And yes, I was proven wrong.

[maniacmechanic]

Why do folks keep beatin on Doug ? It's like beatin your head on a concrete wall , you won't break it , you won't change it and you surely won't change the way it is
Some folks ya just can't reach ,,,,

[Pyrate Jim]

Opph, b3g to differ. That name was not in the direct quote. That was in another post. Who is to understand that what you wrote days before, that it is the same reference too? We are not mind readers, and I definitely do not click on any YouTube links(it would interfere with my own algorithm on YT). So, instead of getting all butthurt, take a moment to actually reference yourself and write the name. As that is an excellent way to make sure who or what you are talking about is being understood. You know, communication skills. I am holding anywhere from 2 to 5 sub-threads in this one post. H3nce why I direct quote, as a lot will get lost in the chaff, as it were. So don't blame me, blame yourself. I am not the fool here

I think somebody has been sniffing that funny fog.
You complain that I don't stay on topic. Although if I make two different posts on the same subject, you claim you cannot put the two together and somehow, I'm at fault for not spelling it out as if to a child.
Once again, you deny the truth. Doubling down over the fact that I did take a moment to reference myself and wrote the name. You say it never happened, yet there it is in post #1508.
I understand you don't want your YT algorithm contaminated by reality, the truth or anything else that might compromise your self-proclaimed omniscience.
I carry no blame. I am not responsible for your willful ignorance, lack of understanding or refusal to even look at evidence just because the source is YT or Fox or any others that might interfere with your personal opinion. That's on you.

[Pyrate Jim]

Why do folks keep beatin on Doug ? It's like beatin your head on a concrete wall , you won't break it , you won't change it and you surely won't change the way it is
Some folks ya just can't reach ,,,,

Maybe not reach them, but a lot of amphigory with a touch of schadenfreude is still comical.

[Beemer]

Maybe not reach them, but a lot of amphigory with a touch of schadenfreude is still comical.

I SEE what you did there.

[Nobody]

I think somebody has been sniffing that funny fog. nope. While i do not condone its use by other people, i do not like how it effects me.
You complain that I don't stay on topic. Although if I make two different posts on the same subject, you claim you cannot put the two together and somehow, I'm at fault for not spelling it out as if to a child.
Once again, you deny the truth. Doubling down over the fact that I did take a moment to reference myself and wrote the name. You say it never happened, yet there it is in post #1508. so, after 1000 posts, you change up and now it's my fault? A simple pointer, or reference to a different post, would have helped, but like all followers of the repu licans, even when you are wrong, you are still right. So no, you could have corrected the confusion, but you didn't, so how i can i be at fault.
I understand you don't want your YT algorithm contaminated by reality, the truth or anything else that might compromise your self-proclaimed omniscience. no. It that is your reality, that is the cesspool that you like to bath in. I do watch enough right wing media, as it would be foolish to only hear one side, but I use YouTube as entertainment, not for rage baiting.
I carry no blame. I am not responsible for your willful ignorance, lack of understanding or refusal to even look at evidence just because the source is YT or Fox or any others that might interfere with your personal opinion. That's on you.

If I were to reference something a week ago. No one would know what I am talking about. That is a common way to communicate what exactly you are talking about. You again choose to be obtuse tothat, and to even shorten the confusion, not me. Remember, when you point a finger, 3 more are pointing back at you.