an email I sent to the parntership for a drug free california...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1stdeadeye
    Still around????
    • Jun 2002
    • 8501

    #46
    Re: Re: Wrong again!

    Originally posted by irbodden


    Pharmacia buddy.......
    ???

    GlaxoSmithKline

    BTW, GSK spent over $4billion on R&D last year!

    NYSE symbol: GSK

    Comment

    • irbodden
      Registered User
      • Dec 2000
      • 3413

      #47
      Sell that and buy PHA...

      Comment

      • SlartyBartFast
        The Flying Scotsman
        • Jun 2002
        • 2940

        #48
        Re: Wrong again!

        Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
        You sound to me like a typical Canadian whiner upset that your little country lives in the shadow of the world's lone remaining superpower.

        BTW As a native of the Washington DC area, Thanks for the Montreal Expos, we will take very good care of them!
        Well it's obviously not worth discussing anything with you then is it?

        Start by looking here http://www.nysenior.org/Issues/Presc.../research.html
        I only did a quick Google. Sorry, but most of knowledge is what a learn over the years I don't index it to regurgitate for people who aren't interested in discussing anyway.

        You're American and your right.

        Good luck with the Expos. They're all americans anyways so personnally I don't see why I should care if they go.

        Million dollar athletes looking for government handouts. Now there's a bunch of whiners...
        ------------------------------
        When Bush says that the Senate's refusal to permanently reduce estate taxes for the wealthiest 2% of Americans is a "disappointment to the American people", does that mean he thinks that the 98% who would have to make up the estimated $60 billion annual cost of that reduction are (a) oblivious to facts, (b) exceedingly generous to the rich, or (c) not part of the American people?

        --------------------------------------------

        Comment

        • InfinatyBPS
          Dead Black Rose
          • May 2001
          • 2404

          #49
          Originally posted by joeyjoe367


          Is being a drunkard immoral? Ask most people, and they'll say yes. It's no differant for a pot-head, IMO.

          I don't know what "mindless" media you're talking about. I don't watch TV or listen to the radio. I know in myself, that getting high/drunk/whatever is immoral, and that's my belief. If you don't agree with that, then fine. My arguing isn't going to change your oppinion, i don't believe.

          Having Oregano make me lose weight or gain muscle would be GREAT. Marijuana doesn't do that, and the comparison you're making is absurd.
          How can you say that getting drunk and high is anything the same? There is such a thing called alchoholism, but marijuana isn't addictive and and when your drunk, more often than not you get violent and you pretty much black out and don't remember anything from when you were drunk, and in a way you are escaping your problems... But, when you are high, most people don't get violent, you remember pretty much everything that happens, and you aren't hiding from your problems you are just taking a break from them

          Also I added OR it makes you feel good when i was talking about the oregano so hey, that might mean its immoral... I'm not going to argue about morals either, people get ot choose what they want to do, like alot of people think being gay is immoral, yet people do it and well... lets not get into it...
          You smell like dookie... No really though.

          Comment

          • da_shibmeister
            Dont be a menace
            • Sep 2002
            • 68

            #50
            personally, i believe smoking anything is about as stupid as you can get. i dont need foreign substances to give me a good time. i can do that on my own. but like it or not, people like to do drugs. for that reason, i believe many drugs should be legalized, and to make it the fdas job to regulate and insure drug content and purity.. imagine all the taxes this would generate. imagine all the money not going to lock people for possession and use, instead going to rebuild an innercity park. i think a a great deal of this money should be redirected to more research into the effects of marijuana and other drugs. then, a large public education program to tell people just how these drugs can be for you. however, i dont know if this will be effective. people know just how bad cigarettes are for you, yet they still smoke them. it is human nature, we succomb to our desires even when we know what the harm satisfying them will do to us.

            Comment

            • 1stdeadeye
              Still around????
              • Jun 2002
              • 8501

              #51
              Re: Re: Wrong again!

              Originally posted by SlartyBartFast




              Good luck with the Expos. They're all americans anyways so personnally I don't see why I should care if they go.

              Million dollar athletes looking for government handouts. Now there's a bunch of whiners...
              ------------------------------
              Here we can agree!!! I am just happy to see major league ball back in my home town. It has been a long time since the Washington Senators left to become the Texas Rangers!

              Actually they are not all Americans, alot of them are Latin Americans.

              Comment

              • Jack_Dubious
                ubi dubium ibi libertas
                • Apr 2002
                • 922

                #52
                Re: Wrong again!

                Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
                You sound to me like a typical Canadian whiner upset that your little country lives in the shadow of the world's lone remaining superpower.
                heh...i bet theres about a billion Chinese that would argue against that.



                JDub

                "Automags.org. You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."

                Comment

                • 1stdeadeye
                  Still around????
                  • Jun 2002
                  • 8501

                  #53
                  Re: Re: Wrong again!

                  Originally posted by Jack_Dubious


                  heh...i bet theres about a billion Chinese that would argue against that.



                  JDub
                  Haha!

                  I'll worry about more about the Chines when they build a few more ICBMs. Right now, to bring those numbers to bear they would have to make it through the Pacific Fleet. That just isn't going to happen.

                  Besides in 10-15 years, they will be just like Russia. Freedom is like a virus. Once it takes hold, it spreads. The Chinese have started themselves down this path with their Free Enterprise zones. Tieneman Square was a start. Hopefully their change will be along the non-violent path, but the change will come. A small oligarchy can not hold sway over that many people forever.

                  Also India will have a larger population then China in the next 50 years so let them and China fight it out.

                  Comment

                  Working...