Originally posted by Trench
Um, good try but NO....
Lets work off of yours...
With what you said makes no point because the risks are the same, just one looks better? I mean come on, there is no difference... Just because a girl is less attractive means you might not get a STD from her? Lol... GO UGLY GIRLS! And yes, thats what you said...
So yes, ugly girls give STDS off less... Lol.... I like it!
Anymore analogys that have no point to them?
Um, good try but NO....
Lets work off of yours...
With what you said makes no point because the risks are the same, just one looks better? I mean come on, there is no difference... Just because a girl is less attractive means you might not get a STD from her? Lol... GO UGLY GIRLS! And yes, thats what you said...
So yes, ugly girls give STDS off less... Lol.... I like it!
Anymore analogys that have no point to them?
and where in the hell did u get ugly girls give off less stds? i never said that, i said the chances are the same but your less likely to do an ungly girl and if u dont have sex u cant get the STD. you really sure your not collegeboys offspring? if you honestly think thats what i said i have VERY little faith for your "home schooling" system... you are iliterate and idiotic i say go out and get a fast car do the world a favor and rid your genetic material from this earth so that you cannot pass on any of your traits... i hope you under stood that.



Comment