A few months ago, I wore a t-shirt to school that said, "Free Palestine" and in small subtext "BoycottIsraeligoods.com". I was told to take the shirt off by the school administration on the grounds that it "Would offend students whose parents worked with Israel in the trade bussiness". I was further told by the principal of the school that anything with a negative tone, anything that said "boycott" would not be allowed. Now, on Earth Day, there were fliers all over the school saying "boycott exxon-mobile". At the assembly for Earth Day (which all students are required to go to... It resembles a nazi rally to me...) one of the Russian Jews at my school who was leading the assembly yelled into the mic "BOYCOTT EXXON MOBILE... EVIL COMPANY...." (the kid has since graduated and is at Harvard right now).
Initially I was pissed because under freedom of speech I should be allowed to wear a shirt with a non-inciting political message (non-aggressive and non-violent). I mean what if someone wore a shirt that said "End the apparheid in South Africa" back when people boycotted South Africa? It seems arbitrary to give a reasoning like that. But now I'm just teed off because a rich jew is allowed to yell into a microphone that Exxon Mobile is an evil company and that everyone should boycott it, and I can't wear in silent protest a shirt that says "Free Palestine".
[/rant]
Initially I was pissed because under freedom of speech I should be allowed to wear a shirt with a non-inciting political message (non-aggressive and non-violent). I mean what if someone wore a shirt that said "End the apparheid in South Africa" back when people boycotted South Africa? It seems arbitrary to give a reasoning like that. But now I'm just teed off because a rich jew is allowed to yell into a microphone that Exxon Mobile is an evil company and that everyone should boycott it, and I can't wear in silent protest a shirt that says "Free Palestine".
[/rant]




), but it is still freedom of speech and expression, both guarded under the 1st ammendment, symbolic speech recieves the same protection as verbal speech (see Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines School District)
Comment