Howdy Nader

[logamus]

this is how we deal with nader in Texas.

[painTech]

you shouldn't reject the only candidate who might help the country.

[Target Practice]

Wait...didn't Nader design the Pacer? Anyone that designs something so hideous has no right to run this country. Come on, that has to qualify as a crime against humanity.

[Chris42050]

I like nader. He really seams like he wants to help the U.S. not just himself.

[NJPaint]

I like nader. He really seams like he wants to help the U.S. not just himself.

Met him a year ago June. He isn't exactly the most photogenic guy, but you are right in that he doesn't seek personal glory in this, he wants to help the US.

[1stdeadeye]

he wants to help the US.

His way though. I believe Bush and Kerry both want the US to be a better place too. It is all a matter of perspective. From my vantage point, Nadar might as well have Michael Moore as his running mate.

[NJPaint]

I honestly don't, I think that both Bush and Kerry are wrapped up in politics. Maybe they "have to be" but I like George Washington's idea of keeping the President above politics.

[Rooster]

Nadar is in no way above politics. He's using judicial activism to try to force his way around the laws of the land.

Just the same old liberal, in a much uglier box.

[NJPaint]

Of course, Rooster knows all this, but can't prove anything.

[Rooster]

Stating the obvious requires no proof

[Jeffy-CanCon]

It is pretty obvious what Nader is doing, and judicial activism is the right word for it. In the instance of challenging the Texas law.

But I think he is right to do so. Democracy cannot be allowed to become a tyranny of the majority. Why should political parties have an easier time getting their candidates on the ballot than independents? That does amount to discrimination, from where I am sitting. In order for democracy t work, we have to encourage free speech, and maximum participation.

[NJPaint]

Stating the obvious requires no proof

Ya, Bush is an idiot, I'm stating the obvious here...