Insane Canon Equipment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bluestrike_2
    Archer
    • Jan 2004
    • 481

    #1

    Insane Canon Equipment

    Real incospicuos.

    From a post at DPREVIW.com

    Well, I've enjoyed the commentary on what I thought was a pretty comical sight when I took the picture. Due to the popularity, I've gone back and posted more photos of the guy in a new gallery: http://www.pbase.com/ssmithx/photographer
    To clarify for everyone:


    - Not posed. I witnessed him in action for three days at the Ryder Cup... suprisingly (or not) looking exactly the same each day.
    - All Canon equipment. Nikon straps on a few.



    - Huge fan of duct tape. In fact, he had a roll of it hanging from a hook that was attached to his vest.


    - All film. I watched him wrestle with cameras, tripods, and bags trying to change rolls of film and make notes on the canisters.


    - A close up inspection of his badge confirms his name is Alex Jackson as one of the posts indicates.


    - Clearly a known entity in the golf world. He was acknowledged by players and caddies alike. The fans even seemed to enjoy his presence.


    - He seems to be a fan of Stena Line - note the hat and several stickers. I assumed it was related to his work, though Stena Line is a large ferry / shipping operation that travels Scandenavian and UK routes.


    - If anyone has a link to this guys work, would love to see. He definitely works hard.


    My thanks to vernix for posting a message for me at pbase explaining why my page views drastically increased over the past week. I couldn't figure it out until I saw this thread. I'll look forward to seeing if the other images spark more discussion.





    Missing one photo...

    Credit: http://www.pbase.com/ssmithx/photographer

    Anyhow, it seems his Canon straps broke, so a Nikon rep gave him a few Nikon straps.

    "So waht happens when he needs to call go to the bathroom?"

    "He uses a remote release."

    Amazing. Originally I thought that was the 1200mm on his back, an $80,000+ behemoth. Then I realized it was too small....

    Lucky SOB....

    Oh on the matter of the 1200....


    My Glass Is Bigger Than Your Glass:
    The Most Extreme Lens Available For The XL1


    The Watchdog notes: I was very fortunate recently to have been invited to the Canon Imaging Center in Salt Lake City, Utah for the 2002 Winter Olympics. This facility is operated by Canon Professional Services as a courtesy to properly credentialed pro photographers, who may freely check out Canon digital still cameras, DV camcorders and the full array of Canon EOS still photography lenses. One day I was discussing the merits of Canon EOS lenses on the XL1S, and Dave Metz of CPS suggested trying out the "Big Guy" with the camcorder.

    The "Big Guy" is Canon's largest EOS prime lens, a ridiculously huge 1200mm monstrosity. There are only about ten of these things in existence. Sports Illustrated owns two of them. Generally speaking you have to be a major corporation to even think about buying one, as they're individually hand milled in Japan to the tune of about USD$80,000 each. Knowing that I had a rare opportunity here, I thought I would take some photos for all of you to drool over.

    We had to point this thing down the length of West 200th St. in Salt Lake City, towards the Wasatch Mountains several miles away, in order to see anything through it. Remember that the XL1 EOS adapter multiplies the focal length of any EOS lens by a factor of 7.2, so this 1200mm lens had an effective 35mm equivalent focal length in the neighborhood of 8640mm, which isn't a lens anymore, but a telescope.

    Kevin Fogarty of Canon Professional Services reads the lower line of an optometrist's eye chart on an office wall about twenty blocks away. But seriously, you could actually see a license plate clearly on a car about a half-mile down the street. We did get the attention of some passing cops; not surprising since this rig looks like a bizarre kind of rocket launcher.

    Now that's an outrageous amount of glass. The Canon 1200mm prime lens has an aperture of f/5.6; it soaks up a lot of light and needs a bright, sunny day to work well. It uses Canon's ultrasonic optical tecnology but does not have image stabilization. It does include its very own heavy-duty tripod. You don't mount this lens to a camera; instead, you mount a camera to this lens.

    Canon technician Seiji Matsu****a observes life on a distant planet. Throwing aside all inhibitions, we've added a 2x extender, which you can see between the back end of the lens and the EOS adapter. This doubles the effective focal length to a 35mm equivalent of 17280mm, yes, there are five digits in that number, which of course is utterly insane.

    Brian Matsumoto of Canon Professional Services demonstrates the bulk and heft of this gigantic lens. Check out the massive built-in handle. It weighs about forty pounds and has its own hardshell shipping case. Whenever I see this lens, it makes me think it's some moving part off of a battleship somewhere.

    My thanks to the crew at the Canon Imaging Center for setting up this little experiment for the benefit of the Watchdog. I'm sure an XL1 has been married to the 1200mm lens before, but I've never seen it until now. Hope you enjoy these pics as much as I do!





    Worth atleast $80,000. Current price unknown. 12 in existance. 2 for Sports Illustrated. 8 to private collectors. 2 unkown.

    So let's see. Mark II. Good range of 'L' lenses. XL2 DV Cam.

    Holy crap. Too much. House or lenses?

    Ugh. Sticking to Nikon....


    Although the Nikon 1200-1700 f/4 is so much cooler. So much more expensive though.


    And bigger.


    And people thought the thread about the plethora of Canons was cool...
    "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
    -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

    http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO
  • Gitaroo Man
    Desafortunadamente
    • May 2002
    • 1536

    #2
    Canons are sweet....i got me 2...maybe i should pick up one of those lenses lol

    Good Traders: MrMag, RogueFactor, LawFox32,Daroach,magsRus,donggie,irbodden,SIGSays, lopxtc
    BAD TRADERS: Jezus/TheEmagGuy

    Comment

    • Bluestrike_2
      Archer
      • Jan 2004
      • 481

      #3

      Found the one image



      Yeah... Tell you what I'll split the cost with you. So that's about $50k each....

      Of course I'm a nikon man.

      {Hopefully all realize I'm kidding about splitting the cost}
      "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
      -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

      http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
      http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO

      Comment

      • P.A.N.G.
        nuscaince of the smartones
        • Nov 2004
        • 16

        #4
        im not reading all of that

        Comment

        • Will Wood
          Evil Monkey
          • May 2002
          • 3475

          #5

          That's nuts.

          Comment

          • Gitaroo Man
            Desafortunadamente
            • May 2002
            • 1536

            #6
            OK, you buy it then i'll pay you back the other half after you send it to my house ok? sweet

            Good Traders: MrMag, RogueFactor, LawFox32,Daroach,magsRus,donggie,irbodden,SIGSays, lopxtc
            BAD TRADERS: Jezus/TheEmagGuy

            Comment

            • dynastyfan
              Logic paintball ftw
              • Jun 2004
              • 457

              #7
              man you could cram several small mamals into that thing

              Comment

              • Bluestrike_2
                Archer
                • Jan 2004
                • 481

                #8
                a) It's not that much
                b) Who cares if you don't
                c) You must not be into photography
                d) It's mostly photos


                On another note, I discussed a switch from Nikon to Canon with Musikman. Sadly my lenses didn't hold their value too well, even though their all at about a 9+ quality. So I couldn't make the switch with less than $1800-$2000. And I'm not selling my Mamiyas to make the switch, or I could get some nice lenses.

                God I hate sacrifices.

                So unless my financial position can improve a bit more to make such a switch feasible, it's limited to:

                Nikon D70
                Nikon D100 >> Outdated
                Fujifilm Finepix S2 Pro - Better than S3 IMHO
                or the S3 Pro.

                I could possibly earn enough for a D2H, but that would take a little longer....
                Or a D1X Refurb. then get the buffer upgrade.
                D2x would rock, but that would be around $4000, if estimates are right.

                Of course there's Calumet's leasing, with the $1 buyout at the end. But that could actually be bad...

                Oh my god, do I hate compromises

                Or I could try and make an Olympus E1 system work, but the only good thing with that would be the weatherproofing.

                Of course I must always keep the Canon door open.

                Opinions for a wildlife and landscape photographer? Going off topic. Sorry.
                "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
                -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

                http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
                http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO

                Comment

                • P.A.N.G.
                  nuscaince of the smartones
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 16

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dynastyfan
                  man you could cram several small mamals into that thing

                  and then blow it up

                  Comment

                  • Bluestrike_2
                    Archer
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 481

                    #10
                    Wait a second.

                    Blow up an $80,000 handmade lense?

                    Are you insane?

                    "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
                    -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

                    http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
                    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO

                    Comment

                    • dynastyfan
                      Logic paintball ftw
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 457

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Bluestrike_2


                      Are you insane?
                      as a matter of fact he is

                      Comment

                      • P.A.N.G.
                        nuscaince of the smartones
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 16

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dynastyfan
                        as a matter of fact he is

                        Comment

                        • behemoth
                          SVSTC?
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 7750

                          #13
                          Amazing. Originally I thought that was the 1200mm on his back, an $80,000+ behemoth. Then I realized it was too small....
                          i wasnt on his back....

                          Comment

                          • SpecialBlend2786
                            Registered User
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 4023

                            #14
                            Originally posted by behemoth
                            i wasnt on his back....
                            lmao

                            Comment

                            • Halliday
                              Level 10
                              • Oct 2000
                              • 1655

                              #15
                              That photog pictured has about the worst technique I've ever seen. Put your elbows into your body and make yourself into a human tripod.


                              Super Moderator at Pbreview.com

                              Comment

                              Working...