Some Macro Photography

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrMag
    Dangeresque
    • Apr 2002
    • 1328

    #46
    Psht digital photography! Back in my day we had to wait 2 minutes for a print to develop, 15 seconds to neutralize, another 2 to make them last forever and another 7 just to rinse. Man you guys make me feel old, I can't believe I am almost 19...
    Arggggh

    HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE
    cold as ice

    Comment

    • Muzikman
      Everything AGD
      • Dec 2000
      • 6229

      #47
      I too have done film and print developing, and damn is digital nice. No more headaches from chemicals
      Last edited by Muzikman; 05-31-2005, 03:18 PM.

      Comment

      • Hexis
        Green Mag Freak
        • Sep 2001
        • 2427

        #48
        Originally posted by Muzikman
        I too have done film and print developing, and damn is digital nice. Not more headaches from chemicals

        Raw files give similar latitude as film. High end cameras (will be normal in a few years) have better resolution than even the best film. Much better noise on high ISO sensor settings (1600 isn't all that bad on a CMOS sensor).

        Digital r teh win.

        Anyone know of a particularly sharp/good macro lens (for Canon EF)? The only problem I have with the 1Ds is that it requires the aboslute best glass, and even then it's still beyond the resolution of the glass.

        For example, the 50 f1.4 is super sharp, and you can easily tell a difference between that and the 24-70mm f2.8. There is a huge big ugly massive difference. Cheap glass is far far worse than the L zooms. It's a pain.

        Comment

        • Muzikman
          Everything AGD
          • Dec 2000
          • 6229

          #49
          The lens that was talked about above is probably the best Macro you can get. It's the Canon 100M 2.8 USM.

          As for digital quality over film. The 1Ds Mark II has reached film quality, so with the right sensor 16MP seems to be about it. Now we just need to wait for the price to drop to a reasonable level.

          Comment

          • Hexis
            Green Mag Freak
            • Sep 2001
            • 2427

            #50
            I don't think we will see the 1Ds drop, but I think we will end up seeing similar sensors in prosumer level cameras in the next few years. The 20D is pretty swanky overall. It just feels clunky compared to the 1Ds.

            Comment

            • Blennidae
              an epileptic hummingbird
              • Nov 2001
              • 1920

              #51
              All the pictures I posted were taken with a 20D and the 100mm 2.8 macro Muzikman is talking about. Canon does make a 180mm macro that is an "L" lens, so it might be better. I don't know what are your criteria for "best" macro lens. I have seen some really nice shots done with reversed lenses. The guys seriously into macro stuff have a whole bag of unconventional tricks to get some incredible shots.

              Comment

              • Muzikman
                Everything AGD
                • Dec 2000
                • 6229

                #52
                You will see the price of the 1ds Mark II come down just as the price of the 1D came down and the price of the 1Ds came down. It will not stay at $8k for ever. But to be honest, for the 35mm SLR folks, it looks like the Canon 16MP sensor is as good as you are going to need to get film quality prints.

                I didn't know there was an L macro lens.

                Comment

                • Blennidae
                  an epileptic hummingbird
                  • Nov 2001
                  • 1920

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Muzikman
                  I didn't know there was an L macro lens.

                  Comment

                  • Muzikman
                    Everything AGD
                    • Dec 2000
                    • 6229

                    #54
                    Hmm, I would have liked to have seen it be a f2.8, but I guess with the 180mm the control of DoF would still be great being even a f3.5.

                    Comment

                    Working...