Would the plane take off?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bjjb99
    Registered User
    • Dec 2001
    • 318

    #181
    Man, and here I thought this thread was bad... check out the 2400+ posts in this one.

    http://forum.physorg.com/Plane-on-co...-off_2417.html

    BJJB

    Comment

    • Glickman
      *Insert Witty Phrase*
      • Sep 2003
      • 2673

      #182
      jebus...



      Yes, the plane can take off, and no it can not.



      ANY PLANE CAN TAKEOFF WITHOUT LIFT!

      granted it needs alot of thrust (and an angle) , but its possible

      Comment

      • Lohman446
        Useful posts: 7
        • Jun 2003
        • 9315

        #183
        Originally posted by Glickman
        jebus...



        Yes, the plane can take off, and no it can not.



        ANY PLANE CAN TAKEOFF WITHOUT LIFT!

        granted it needs alot of thrust (and an angle) , but its possible
        Tha plane will have lift though....
        "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

        Comment

        • bleachit
          Conturbo et Ledo
          • May 2003
          • 1410

          #184
          Originally posted by bjjb99
          Man, and here I thought this thread was bad... check out the 2400+ posts in this one.


          http://forum.physorg.com/Plane-on-co...-off_2417.html

          BJJB

          this is ao... if the thread dies, it will be resurected in 6 months and debated all over... in a never ending cycle...


          or at least it would have on the older ao.
          "Great stories! See everyone, just buy a Sydarm and become a paintball superstar!! "
          AGD

          "i just sent out the full force of the canadian army (4 guys). expect high canadian casualties"
          Blackweenie

          Comment

          • Glickman
            *Insert Witty Phrase*
            • Sep 2003
            • 2673

            #185
            Originally posted by Lohman446
            Tha plane will have lift though....

            the point im trying to make is that lift is not required, its very helpful, but not required

            Comment

            • Army
              Moderator of DOOOOOOOOMMM!

              • Oct 2000
              • 5785

              #186
              Somebody please tell me what the SECOND sentence of the question says?

              I'll help you...

              "THE PLANE MOVES IN ONE DIRECTION...."

              This means...in case you need comprehension help.....the plane can, and is moving on the belt.

              With the plane moving independantly of the wheels, due to the thrust of the engines against the air------NOT THE BELT OR GROUND OR WHEEL ASSEMBLY----acceleration will happen. Acceleration to flight speed will happen.

              Belt speeds, wheel speeds, shopping cart speeds, TSA Security speeds, the moons of Jupiter speeds mean NOTHING to the question.

              Here's one last analogy for those who don't know airplanes:

              Same conveyor belt, same runway: YOU are standing NEXT to it (not on it). Grasping firmly to a skateboard, you place the wheels onto the belt.

              Are you with me so far? You are standing next to the belt, holding the wheels of a skateboard to it. Got it? Follow on then:

              Now, still holding the wheels to the belt------walk forward. YES, the wheels roll. YES, the belt now speeds up. But are YOU being rooted to the spot because of this? NOOOOOOOO! You are OBVIOUSLY not, and CANNOT!!!

              Why? Because YOUR forward motion is independant of the belt or skateboard. NOTHING is holding YOU back.

              Heck, you can even RUN next to the belt, and lift the skateboard into the air!

              WHY? Because YOUR forward thrust----JUST LIKE THE ENGINES----has NO bearing on what the wheels or belt are doing.

              The damn plane flies....and you get arrested for trespassing.

              Comment

              • teufelhunden
                Registered Bamf
                • Jul 2003
                • 2691

                #187
                Necropost!

                Mythbusters is doing this now
                SwallowBleach: It's good for you.

                www.seckspb.com: for all your third party needs


                Where have all the scooters gone? -BobTheCow

                Comment

                • teufelhunden
                  Registered Bamf
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 2691

                  #188
                  They tried it out with an ultralight and a 2000' tarp and the plane was able to take off. I don't know if it took more distance to do so [or if there were other differences], as they didn't note it, but it took off.
                  SwallowBleach: It's good for you.

                  www.seckspb.com: for all your third party needs


                  Where have all the scooters gone? -BobTheCow

                  Comment

                  • VTLO910
                    Ballin' since early '90s..
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 215

                    #189
                    Originally posted by teufelhunden
                    Necropost!

                    Mythbusters is doing this now
                    Keep us posted for when this will be aired please. I wanna see this one!

                    Comment

                    • devildog
                      I hate my user name
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 1530

                      #190
                      I didnt read the whole thread, but here is what i am thinking.


                      i voted yes by the way

                      edit, i answered my own question
                      Last edited by devildog; 01-31-2008, 10:13 AM.
                      Zaszczycają waszą ojczyznę

                      just got back from iraq!!!

                      Comment

                      • teufelhunden
                        Registered Bamf
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 2691

                        #191
                        Originally posted by VTLO910
                        Keep us posted for when this will be aired please. I wanna see this one!

                        It aired last night at 9. I'm sure it'll be rerun 400 times in the next week... tvguide.com
                        SwallowBleach: It's good for you.

                        www.seckspb.com: for all your third party needs


                        Where have all the scooters gone? -BobTheCow

                        Comment

                        • Pneumagger
                          I like 'Mags.

                          • Jun 2006
                          • 3556

                          #192
                          Whithout reading the multitude of pages I'm going to have say yes it would take off. It's a trick question.

                          Sure the conveyor belt is moving the opposite direction... but that point is moot. The engines on the wings provide the thrust which drives the plane and produces the relative airspeed difference between the airfoil/air to produce lift forces. The relative speed difference between the plane and air is what is important... this is why aircraft carriers fly INTO the wind and INCREASE headwind by speeding up when planes are taking off. This is also why a "stationary" wing can produce lift in a wind tunnel.

                          Any opposite directional force like a conveyor belt cannot be realized on the body of the plane because the wheels of plane rotate freely upon takeoff. All that would happen is the wheels would spin twice as fast as the plane took off.

                          Now if there as a wicked tailwind on the runway...

                          Comment

                          • Pneumagger
                            I like 'Mags.

                            • Jun 2006
                            • 3556

                            #193
                            New question...

                            What if the plane is a JSF X-35B (F-35 LightningII STOVL)?

                            Comment

                            • Pneumagger
                              I like 'Mags.

                              • Jun 2006
                              • 3556

                              #194
                              Originally posted by neppo1345
                              Whats scary is that one day...you may be flying something that he him or myself have designed

                              Except I got the question right...
                              I love this thread... so much oportunity for shenanigans.

                              One day, something you designed will get pwned when something I designed shoots it down.

                              I win

                              Comment

                              • txaggie08
                                Big mouth
                                • Jan 2005
                                • 1213

                                #195
                                Sure the conveyor belt is moving the opposite direction... but that point is moot. The engines on the wings provide the thrust which drives the plane and produces the relative airspeed difference between the airfoil/air to produce lift forces. The relative speed difference between the plane and air is what is important... this is why aircraft carriers fly INTO the wind and INCREASE headwind by speeding up when planes are taking off. This is also why a "stationary" wing can produce lift in a wind tunnel.

                                they kinda did it on national tv last night dude....


                                What the ones who argued against it missed are the definitions of "speed"

                                In order for something to be "going" a certain speed implies forward motion.

                                Comment

                                Working...