The closed bolt being more accurate thing actually came from a bit of truth in the mid-90's, but not for the reason that you may think. At the time, no one really thought/cared/knew about bore size and accuracy. The gear and sport just wasn't to the point where we really got why everything worked the way it did. The reason that closed bolt was more accurate was an accident. Closed bolt guns needed a good paint-barrel match because otherwise the ball would role out of the barrel. It wasn't a problem on mags/spyders/tippmans (the other popular guns at the time, but really any other open bolt like an illustrator or scorpion or piranha) had because they have ball detents. It was an accident, but many were more accurate because of that. Around the late-90's/2000's we got testing that showed why guns were actually accurate, and people realized that the firing mechanism itself had nothing to do with it.
I'd say ramrod, the magic box, and the market for low pressure chambers in the late 90's that sparked ridiculous claims of further shots and more accuracy.
I'd say ramrod, the magic box, and the market for low pressure chambers in the late 90's that sparked ridiculous claims of further shots and more accuracy.





Comment