To deviate for just a moment.....I know a lot of people are not crazy about ramping, and want "one shot one pull". I actually enjoy ramping markers and am really glad that the decision was made to reduce that ramp to the current 13.3 ramp for many series. To a non competative player, it may be a non issue. I know that when I play rec ball, I prefer to use a mechanical marker.
On to what I want:
Personally I think that the Invert Mini has pretty much embodied everything I want in a marker. It is simple to work on, small, light, efficent. The only thing I do not like about it stock per se is that the board is not as adjustable as I would like it to be. It has not been enough of an issue to actually go spend the $100+ on rectifying it, but I sure do enjoy the features available on the Virtue boarded markers I own.
So to summarize:
Light, efficent, no external air lines, easy to work on, highly adjustable and customizable electronic board. I like a single tube design for the profile. Big trigger guard for ease. Steeper than 45* frames, as I really like 90's. LP operation for depth into the HPA tank.
As another side point, I am still suprized to see people clamoring over "accurate" markers. As if one design is inherently more accurate than another. I suppose that its a throwback to the cocker and low pressure hype that has been made over the years. But that is another discussion, for another thread.
On to what I want:
Personally I think that the Invert Mini has pretty much embodied everything I want in a marker. It is simple to work on, small, light, efficent. The only thing I do not like about it stock per se is that the board is not as adjustable as I would like it to be. It has not been enough of an issue to actually go spend the $100+ on rectifying it, but I sure do enjoy the features available on the Virtue boarded markers I own.
So to summarize:
Light, efficent, no external air lines, easy to work on, highly adjustable and customizable electronic board. I like a single tube design for the profile. Big trigger guard for ease. Steeper than 45* frames, as I really like 90's. LP operation for depth into the HPA tank.
As another side point, I am still suprized to see people clamoring over "accurate" markers. As if one design is inherently more accurate than another. I suppose that its a throwback to the cocker and low pressure hype that has been made over the years. But that is another discussion, for another thread.


haha
I know what I want, I'm interested in everyone else wants. Thanks for joining in and sharing!
CO2 is something I really want to be compatible with, but I doubt it will happen with the size of 1 seal that has the possibility of freezing, but then again it might be ok. PS: I like what you want....a lot.... I bet youd like what I'm working on....a lot
) I agree with you about durability, Ive dove into trees plenty of times(couple night games, long stories :rofl: ) and I would be pissed to have come out with a broken marker, I'm not going to be cutting crash frames thin just to save a few grams....not that theres anything wrong with that, but removing material can only go so far before you start seeing failures
Comment