Tac-One on the Speedball Field

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • roxcreek
    the designated driver
    • Jul 2008
    • 251

    #31
    I don't want to get a marker with much if any electronics. I just enjoy mechanical markers moe than I do electros. Don't get me wrong I think electric guns are a huge innovation to the paintball industry, it's just that mech markers are easier for me to tinker with, easier to understand, and I like the fact that mech markers started paintball and so the technology has been refined more.

    The main reason I was attracted to the Tac-One was it's looks, not necissarily the rails. I can't even think of anything that I would even want to put on them. I was also uninformed that the Tac-One was pretty much just an Automag with a different wrapper. A third element that attracted me was the Tac-One's rating on PB Review.com. (9.9 out of ten and the only two 9s on the report card were highly disputed)

    Comment

    • Sundown
      Livin'
      • Jul 2008
      • 561

      #32
      Yeah if you the an RT ULE.. its the same thing as a Tac-One...
      So if you do not need/want the rails.. just get an RT ULE.

      Great marker my friend.. you will not regret it

      What you playing with now?

      Comment

      • Dalm
        Registered User
        • Sep 2008
        • 21

        #33
        Originally posted by snoopay700
        Booo bouncing, hooray red stripe. Red stripe, hooray beer!
        Is it really bouncing? I mean its an RT "reactive trigger" no? Guess Im not sure where the line gets drawn as to what classifies bounce. Tippmann jumped on the idea and ran with it as well. I suppose its arguing points of view. I always thought bounce was the effect of the marker firing causing it to fire again. Not using an " air assisted" trigger to fire faster/shrug

        When judges test for bounce don't they bump the marker on the back to see if it fires?

        Comment

        • roxcreek
          the designated driver
          • Jul 2008
          • 251

          #34
          Originally posted by Sundown
          Yeah if you the an RT ULE.. its the same thing as a Tac-One...
          So if you do not need/want the rails.. just get an RT ULE.

          Great marker my friend.. you will not regret it

          What you playing with now?
          Thanks for the advice, I am using a heavily milled US5 from PCS, and a ICD Promaster (with no ASA or hopper.) and a 98c as a backup and lending gun.

          Comment

          • snoopay700
            Serious About Men

            • Jan 2006
            • 3071

            #35
            Originally posted by Dalm
            Is it really bouncing? I mean its an RT "reactive trigger" no? Guess Im not sure where the line gets drawn as to what classifies bounce. Tippmann jumped on the idea and ran with it as well. I suppose its arguing points of view. I always thought bounce was the effect of the marker firing causing it to fire again. Not using an " air assisted" trigger to fire faster/shrug

            When judges test for bounce don't they bump the marker on the back to see if it fires?
            Bouncing is using the trigger getting pushed back out by the valve (at twice the pressure it took to fire the marker) to fire the marker again, and again and again.
            Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

            Comment

            Working...