Integrated Rail Gripframe?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ando
    Magusmaximus
    • Jun 2009
    • 4144

    #31
    The cap valve is retarded when there's aluminum backs you can put on which makes the weight savings nil. Less even when you start adding all the BS regulator etc... to the front of the marker.
    Last edited by Ando; 05-17-2012, 07:41 AM.
    My Feedback

    Comment

    • OPBN
      OldPBNoob

      • Sep 2008
      • 5240

      #32
      Having issues with photobucket, but here are some numbers:

      Setup 1: Xvalve, ULE body, Chimera frame, UL rail, RTP vert ASA, Bike grip = 24.50oz.

      Setup 2: Xvalve with reg removed, Cap, Chimera Frame, UL rail, RTP vert ASA, AKA Sidewinder reg = 20.95oz.

      AKA sidewinders are good regs right?
      My AO Feedback

      Comment

      • BigEvil
        www.BigEvilOnline.com

        • Feb 2005
        • 9333

        #33
        Originally posted by OPBN
        Having issues with photobucket, but here are some numbers:

        Setup 1: Xvalve, ULE body, Chimera frame, UL rail, RTP vert ASA, Bike grip = 24.50oz.

        Setup 2: Xvalve with reg removed, Cap, Chimera Frame, UL rail, RTP vert ASA, AKA Sidewinder reg = 20.95oz.

        AKA sidewinders are good regs right?

        You do know that by 'capping' the back of an Xvalve, you are basically turning it into an A.I.R. valve?

        Comment

        • OPBN
          OldPBNoob

          • Sep 2008
          • 5240

          #34
          Originally posted by BigEvil
          You do know that by 'capping' the back of an Xvalve, you are basically turning it into an A.I.R. valve?
          OK? So I lose the RT effect? If its electro that shouldnt be a problem right?
          My AO Feedback

          Comment

          • Ando
            Magusmaximus
            • Jun 2009
            • 4144

            #35
            I don't need to have a vert asa, bike grip, 2 macro fitting and extra line to shot that mag.

            Factor that into your oz for oz comparison...

            Really????

            We really fighting over oz?

            I really don't see how a RT valve would work without the back
            My Feedback

            Comment

            • OPBN
              OldPBNoob

              • Sep 2008
              • 5240

              #36
              Originally posted by Ando
              I don't need to have a vert asa, bike grip and 2 macro fitting and extra line to shot that mag.

              Factor that into your oz for oz comparison...

              Really????

              We really fighting over oz?


              I really don't see how a RT valve would work without the back
              Not sure why you're getting so hated over this. The picture showed a foregrip that I assuemed is aluminum with two macro fittings. I was simply trying to do a fair comparison. Sure, you could run a DW carbon fiber forerip with an Xvalve and it would be lighter than a capped valve setup with a reg, but personally I like gas thrus. Figured since I have to have a foregrip anyways, it might as well double for something.

              Capping an X is actually harder apparently, its why I am trying to find someone willing to mill a few classic style valve bodies from aluminum. No one seems to be able to give me a number so its probably never going to happen.
              My AO Feedback

              Comment

              • Ando
                Magusmaximus
                • Jun 2009
                • 4144

                #37
                No one's getting hated

                I'm just showing how a cap valve has no advantage over a non capped one. Weight or function wise...
                My Feedback

                Comment

                • BigEvil
                  www.BigEvilOnline.com

                  • Feb 2005
                  • 9333

                  #38
                  The forgrip is removable and just there to make the picture purdy

                  Comment

                  • OPBN
                    OldPBNoob

                    • Sep 2008
                    • 5240

                    #39
                    Guess I took you calling me retarded the wrong way. Not sure why, but I just really like the idea of capped valve. Looks cleaner IMO.
                    My AO Feedback

                    Comment

                    • Ando
                      Magusmaximus
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 4144

                      #40
                      Originally posted by OPBN
                      Guess I took you calling me retarded the wrong way. Not sure why, but I just really like the idea of capped valve. Looks cleaner IMO.
                      Lol..You'll know when I call you (personally) retarded.

                      The Idea of it is cool as in "another way to mod a mag" but using it as a wight saver or better functioning. I would have to call shenanigans!!!
                      My Feedback

                      Comment

                      • Flatliner333
                        3X MOTY Winner :P

                        • Mar 2009
                        • 1286

                        #41
                        Very nice , is that a removable breach with options like an XMag or does it spin like the Micro Mag breach. I dont gues it will have BB eyes...who needs um anyways.
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • BigEvil
                          www.BigEvilOnline.com

                          • Feb 2005
                          • 9333

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Flatliner333
                          Very nice , is that a removable breach with options like an XMag or does it spin like the Micro Mag breach. I dont gues it will have BB eyes...who needs um anyways.

                          No, its just the way the software renders the transition from round to square, and it is on a weird angle so it looks funny.

                          Comment

                          • Carnage reigns
                            New Age Mag Man
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 787

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Ando
                            Lol..You'll know when I call you (personally) retarded.

                            Thle Idea of it is cool as in "another way to mod a mag" but using it as a weight saver or better functioning. I would have to call shenanigans!!!
                            I would think it would save some weight. (Reg on X-valve + Foregrip) - Foregrip mounted reg = Weight Savings.
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • GoatBoy
                              Junior Mint
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 1399

                              #44
                              Some of us don't need the RT.

                              On the other hand, I like having a CO2 tolerant regulator up front.

                              Capping the back would potentially shorten the backside of the gun up, for those of us who tend to hold our guns up to our faces.

                              And I think the weight savings would be pretty decent considering an aluminum cap by itself should weigh much less than a full aluminum housing which includes 2 steel springs, velocity adjuster, and a regulator nut.


                              I mean I can go measure the back half of an X-valve reg if you really don't believe it.
                              "Accuracy by aiming."


                              Definitely not on the A-Team.

                              Comment

                              • OPBN
                                OldPBNoob

                                • Sep 2008
                                • 5240

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Carnage reigns
                                I would think it would save some weight. (Reg on X-valve + Foregrip) - Foregrip mounted reg = Weight Savings.
                                If you look at my example above, it does. Granted, it's only 3.5 oz, but it's actually a 14.5% weight reduction. Personally, I would love to shave off 14.5% of my weght.
                                My AO Feedback

                                Comment

                                Working...