AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
Got to agree with Allen. Those 3 points are the most important. I see mag-fed as a niche of limited paint. Plus, Dye dam mags are huge, compared to either Tiberius or TPX mags.
On the other side, if you go dye dam mags, you can play around with the box rotor??
The box-rotor has a squared off lid that actually makes loading difficult and more importantly, how is that any different than a warp or a warpless setup? Spend $75-ish on a warpless or $300+(or whatever the cost is) on a box-rotor... Your call
I love this idea! I favor the tpx magazine. I have various magazines for other platforms and lean toward simplicity and reliability. Only grip about tpx magazine is don't take them apart, they are a pain to put back together.
I started a bottom-fed build with DAM mags. I got it to work, now have to work on making it look pretty, but it's on a back shelf for now.
I agree with what everyone else has said: go with TIPX mags.
there are printed magwells available for the TIPX and that's a great starting point;
the mags are relatively inexpensive and come in multiple sizes so you can make it fit your style (not everyone wants a zeta mag sticking out the bottom of their marker);
the mags are reliable and it doesn't look like tippmann is going anywhere;
the mags don't take up near as much real estate on the marker as DAM mags do so you might get away with not relocating the trigger (if going with a bottom-fed design)
That is interesting that the price point is so different, across the pond. I would look at your market and where you would sell them more. But, if it is feasible, do a trial with both. See which one would be more easily adapted and go with that.
Comment