Hybrid RTP Rails

[luke]

Problem with this is you would have gaps at the bottom of the rail and top of the grip frame.

[knownothingmags]

so you will be releasing a rail with no z loc channel?

[luke]

I was going to mill down an rt pro rail to make that... but i was going to go to 1/2" wide around the sear slot

You just can't go 1/2" wide, it's too narrow, it's narrower than a grip frame.

(or maybe some windows into the sear pocket shaped like either a series of holes or like the indents on the ule rails to give it an even slimmer look. .

I dont think it's coming through in the CAD how small this actually is, you may need a full mock up to see it.

That part sticking out behind the grip to support the valve seems boxy.. how about either a 30-45 degree slope or step? Hell, I was gonna cut it off 100% but I get it... maybe a little meat for the valve.

There's less than .625" sticking out past the frame, it's not enough to angle it and make it look right, IMO

I do like this though, and it does look tapered down in the back.

[Gundam V]

It's the second coming of the micromag, lc version. [emoji38]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

[JimBobFett]

Problem with this is you would have gaps at the bottom of the rail and top of the grip frame.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]100030[/ATTACH]

Me personally... Im okay with that. Not a 'gap' but yeah, narrower than the frame. Im okay with that.

[JimBobFett]

You just can't go 1/2" wide, it's too narrow, it's narrower than a grip frame.



I dont think it's coming through in the CAD how small this actually is, you may need a full mock up to see it.




There's less than .625" sticking out past the frame, it's not enough to angle it and make it look right, IMO

I do like this though, and it does look tapered down in the back.

Oh, yeah... that taper... that did it. Good idea. Okay, so without going narrower then or ule style dimples or holes: but that would technically leave more meat than what you have there... hmmm... okay, I get it. Thats pretty much the smallest & lightest you can go with a rail. Im down for a couple!

[JimBobFett]

so you will be releasing a rail with no z loc channel?

What's it really good for anyways? The thumb screw keeps things lined up. Sure, it keeps the regulator on, but so does the elbow fitting.

[JimBobFett]

It's the second coming of the micromag, lc version. [emoji38]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

I was thinking nano-mag or nano-rail. I dont think you can even go much smaller without going narrower than the frame or dimples like the ule rails.

[knownothingmags]

keeps the back half of the regulator safe.

[luke]

I like that style a lot, are you doing pre-orders? If not, how far off from release are they?

I'll probably get a dealer thread up towards the end of the week and then do rails in a few weeks after that. I'm not doing a preorder with minimums but I would like to sell some up front to know what to make. Some of these designs may not be a regular shelf item, but I really don't know at this point, we'll see how it pans out.

[luke]

I have one question, would you be willing to do a one off and make one that accepts winged trigger frames. Just got my hands on a z grip and wanna use it on this. Don't wanna mill off the wings on the frame.

There would be added fees but I sure we can work something out.

[Gundam V]

Right on, looking forward to it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

[dano_____]

I would love to see the ultralight rail with flat sides all the way to the back the width of the minivert frame, no lock pin channel, and keep the round up front that would work a standard winged mag ASA. Also the length of an RT to keep the grips spread out

[yadoo]

Would these rails still need to be notched for a warp body?

[luke]

Would these rails still need to be notched for a warp body?

Depends on the design.