Proof that an autococker shoots further?

[strongboy2005]

I found this site http://www.geocities.com/cockermongol/ and if you go on there and go to the functions (on the side bar) and scroll down to the bottom of the page it has a theory on why autococker shoot further than automags. Made a believer out of me. Check it out.

[ffcocker]

whats that smell

smells like bs to me ill follow his logic say both guns chrono 280 out the barrel drag is taking place from normal variables such as wind resistance and of course our good ol friend gravity as it accelerates its also decelerating but since the mag accelerates quicker then itll travel farther cuz it starts to decelerate at a much higher velocity
but guess what this is that i just typed bull crap thats what it is. All markers have the same range except for a zbody mag and a flatline tippy/cocker

[strongboy2005]

But you gotta admit that is interesting though, i'm thinking about testing the "mongol" theory myself. If you read into it, it's fairly logical.

[Dayspring]

I thought we had gone over this...

Physics is Physics. You can't change it. Not even Einstein.

Oy vey...

[strongboy2005]

Re: whats that smell

Originally posted by ffcocker
say both guns chrono 280 out the barrel drag is taking place from normal variables such as wind resistance and of course our good ol friend gravity as it accelerates its also decelerating but since the mag accelerates quicker then itll travel farther cuz it starts to decelerate at a much higher velocity

Well what it is saying is that the mag ceases to accelerate at the end of the barrel while the cocker accelerates further after the ejaculation.

[Dayspring]

Re: Re: whats that smell

Can't happen... Once the ball leaves that barrel, it begins to decelerate. Just the way it is. Again, it goes back to physics.

Oh, and I'd check out this guy's site, but apparently, we've overloaded his bandwidth.

Originally posted by strongboy2005

Well what it is saying is that the mag ceases to accelerate at the end of the barrel while the cocker accelerates further after the ejaculation.

[strongboy2005]

Originally posted by Dayspring
I thought we had gone over this...

Physics is Physics. You can't change it. Not even Einstein.

Oy vey...

rules were made to be broken. in the 16th century the entire world KNEW that the world was the center of the universe, and if you thought otherwise then you were a heretic and you were burned at the stake. Sir Isaac Newton (and some others) changed that at the beginning of the Renaissance. I'm saying that no one has PROVEN that an autococker doesn't shoot furthur.

[halB]

this is physics we're talking about, things that govern how our airplanes fly and our cars drive. if you change it for paintball, then our airplanes couldnt fly, tornadoes couldnt form, and you couldnt live.

btw, i bet you dont even know why the church was pissed off that he said the earth wasnt in the center of the universe.

[strongboy2005]

What about in space? If you think about it there is no friction in space, but the ball would reach it's maximum acceleration and hold it perfectly forever. If the mag accelerates the ball faster than the autococker then, in theory, it would reach maximum velocity sooner and level off. The autococker would have a higher maximum velocity due to the slower acceleration rate.

[yeahthatsme]

Well what it is saying is that the mag ceases to accelerate at the end of the barrel while the cocker accelerates further after the ejaculation

i think ejaculation isnt the right word...lol


anyways, as was stated, physics is physics.

[strongboy2005]

Originally posted by halB
this is physics we're talking about, things that govern how our airplanes fly and our cars drive. if you change it for paintball, then our airplanes couldnt fly, tornadoes couldnt form, and you couldnt live.

btw, i bet you dont even know why the church was pissed off that he said the earth wasnt in the center of the universe.

yes i know, it's because it said so in the bible. And it's with physics that I am trying to prove this guys point, not with some different type of logic.

[Dayspring]

Using your rationale, we can ridicule you and make disparaging remarks about your parentage until somebody DOES prove it. (Don't hold your breath)

Originally posted by strongboy2005

rules were made to be broken. in the 16th century the entire world KNEW that the world was the center of the universe, and if you thought otherwise then you were a heretic and you were burned at the stake. Sir Isaac Newton (and some others) changed that at the beginning of the Renaissance. I'm saying that no one has PROVEN that an autococker doesn't shoot furthur.

[strongboy2005]

Originally posted by yeahthatsme


i think ejaculation isnt the right word...lol


anyways, as was stated, physics is physics.

But, using Physics, one can not state this theory right or wrong, it would take many tests to prove/disprove this.

[BeerCitySk8brds]

I can't get on that site. But, if it leaves at the same speed it will go the same distance unless it has back spin.

But, didnt AGD say that the Flatline didn't do anything? Cause it isn't like balls have that much friction or anything.

[strongboy2005]

Originally posted by Dayspring
Using your rationale, we can ridicule you and make disparaging remarks about your parentage until somebody DOES prove it. (Don't hold your breath)

I will prove it. I know it will work.