Originally posted by Heat
it's ppl like you that don't read the rules and violate them without knowing it. I'm not saying anything about the UGLY ones, other then they are ugly and unsightly, but you know the limit is 300x150 pixels AND if you use the maximum size you are limited to only 2 lines of text... take a look at Frag teks WHOLE sig, it's got 5 lines of text and 2 images.....
ya know I never cared that you PW like mad, but I do care when you reply with authority and mis the subject compleatly.
it's ppl like you that don't read the rules and violate them without knowing it. I'm not saying anything about the UGLY ones, other then they are ugly and unsightly, but you know the limit is 300x150 pixels AND if you use the maximum size you are limited to only 2 lines of text... take a look at Frag teks WHOLE sig, it's got 5 lines of text and 2 images.....
ya know I never cared that you PW like mad, but I do care when you reply with authority and mis the subject compleatly.
Sig images are once again OUT OF CONTROL. While this usually doesn't bother me, the latest rash of HUGE sigs ARE TRASH effectivly making it a "rash of trash" (TM). Poor quality pics of guns, dogs, ppl, photo shop stuff from ppl that should touch the freaking program and well 2 page essays about who gives a flying cammel but you obviously feel the need to brag about it. Which brings me to point
The the "brings me to point" point just implies that there are more crappy pics, not bigger ones, more of them, nothing like that
while some of these don't violate the sig rules, they are good examples of BAD photo shoping AND combined with the rest of their sigs, they ARE wrong
Sorry if I didn't totaly understand you from the start, but I dont think you were as clear as you should have been if thats what you really wanted to say.






I guess it is a tinnie tiney bit direct, but it's not meant to be degrading
Comment