Tac One vs '04 Autococker

[Chronobreak]

Am I correct in understanding that the Tac One is a more capable marker out of the box, when compared to the stock '04 VF Autococker? What I'm trying to ask is "would I have to upgrade the stock 'Cocker in order to make it comparable to the Tac One?

sounds like u answered your own question.

any upgrades to the cocker to put it in the same class is $ out of your pocket that wont cause much increases. and u wont get a return on your investment s opposed to the tac-one probly having a higher resale value as well.

[maxama10]

Honestly id go with the Tac-One AGD is very reliable although the lvl 10 anti chop bolt can be a witch with a b if not tuned properly but after youve tuned it or if its pre tuned the mag in my opinion would be a better choice also Tom Kaye CEO of AGD is very involved [it seems to me] with his customers [i suppose that last part really had nothing to do with youre question sorry] also i think you can put the hAir frame trigger on a Tac One which would be an expensive but well worth and awsome upgrade

[SOAD8789]

ive used my friends cocker on many occasions, and i can tell you the mag is the better gun. when i was shooting the cocker, i was afraid i would break something, and it generally confused the crap out of me. i got used to the hinge frame to where i would almost never short stroke, and i can pull a much higher ROF with the mag. i dont chop anymore. not one bit. more than i can say about the cocker though. the 04 will chop, but not much. efficiancy is a win for the cocker though. they are fairly efficiant guns. my mag sucks air, but i get over it. you honestly dont need the ULT to get a high ROF on a mag...use it the way it is now. i think you should get a mag, but then again, the only gun i would consider other than a mag is a shocker...

[Glickman]

I've owned both, and guess which on i kept... the mag. Let me break it down The cocker was a whinny women that was always going pre-menstral on me with over complicatedness
The mag was the women that never gave me back talk and has never failed to provide for me

... i dont think ive EVER heard such a awsome but true analogy like that

as for the shocker suggestion, i also just went from a matrix to a shocker, and im absolutly loving it. its very simple to use, very high rate of fire easily (even though i have it set for no bounce), easy to clean, LIGHT!!!, i could carry it with one hand all day (which i pretty much did at shatnerball 3) and its very small.

im not biased either, i love my reflex, but its "winey" and if i dont feed it, it pisses on me

so i would say Cocker < Tac < Shocker

so depending on how much u wanna spend, i would get the tac one or the shocker

(as for effiency, i havent had a problem, i get like 2 rounds of senario, which is like 1 hopper and 2 pods per round.

[jrod]

as for the shocker suggestion, i also just went from a matrix to a shocker, and im absolutly loving it. its very simple to use, very high rate of fire easily (even though i have it set for no bounce), easy to clean, LIGHT!!!, i could carry it with one hand all day (which i pretty much did at shatnerball 3) and its very small.

im not biased either, i love my reflex, but its "winey" and if i dont feed it, it pisses on me

so i would say Cocker < Tac < Shocker

so depending on how much u wanna spend, i would get the tac one or the shocker

(as for effiency, i havent had a problem, i get like 2 rounds of senario, which is like 1 hopper and 2 pods per round.

Yeah, I've pretty much made up my mind on the Tac One. I'm not a smart parts fan, and I want a strictly mechanical marker. Thanks for the input. By the way, I'm sorry I missed shatnerball. It was at my home field (Challenge Park).

[Glickman]

awsome, be sure to give a full review i went with a shocker over a e-tac , i loved tacs more than the e-tacs, but i needed something electro