With the ever incresing rates of fire, first with the electros and now with the pneumatically-assisted mechanical triggers, there's an obvious issue that's not being addressed.
An assisted mech trigger that's capable of firing at an extremely high rate is still lacking the ability to sense the presence of a ball in the breach before it can fire. The Mags can obviously deal well with this issues with a L-10'ed valve, but what about an assisted Cocker Trigger.......and don't tell me use a JAM bolt either!
I recall several years back with Boston paintball coming out with their version of the assisted mech trigger. Saw it shoot once and it was indeed a beast. But due to the lack of high-speed loaders plus the politics of paintball back then, they couldn't capitalize on their product.
Without an eye for the Cocker, any high-speed trigger will, in all likelihood encounter chopping problems. So why bother then? Why not just go electro on a cocker and take advantage of having the ability to have an eye?
What are your thoughts on this?
An assisted mech trigger that's capable of firing at an extremely high rate is still lacking the ability to sense the presence of a ball in the breach before it can fire. The Mags can obviously deal well with this issues with a L-10'ed valve, but what about an assisted Cocker Trigger.......and don't tell me use a JAM bolt either!
I recall several years back with Boston paintball coming out with their version of the assisted mech trigger. Saw it shoot once and it was indeed a beast. But due to the lack of high-speed loaders plus the politics of paintball back then, they couldn't capitalize on their product.
Without an eye for the Cocker, any high-speed trigger will, in all likelihood encounter chopping problems. So why bother then? Why not just go electro on a cocker and take advantage of having the ability to have an eye?
What are your thoughts on this?







Comment