A few comments Tom....
1) That was not good. It was smart, but not cool. It was an expiriment, a test, and I undersatnd that, but you could have just lost alot of peoples trust. When you post questions or descriptions of new products, some people will think "Is he testing us again?" I do understand that companies have to test the marketing waters now and then, but doing that to your trusty AO is risky.
2) Some of us thought you had gone insane. Verdict still pending on that one.
3) We desreved it. Well, no we didn't, but basically you kinda of did to us like what the "got hit by superbolt" kid did to you. I'm not sayign you lied, I'm sure all that you said was true, but it was a kick in the face. Now, all of hte sudden, trying to market a 10 year old barrel like it was brand spankin new and the best in the world.
4) Your fellow followers may have thought this was hte best thing and spent 20$ that they could have put toward soemthign they really needed, like a warp, a new gun, skitz pills.. etc. I'm not saying that 20$ for that thing isn't worht it.. it is... but still. You could have mislead soem people.
Well.. You didn't do anything to me.... No mag = no need to buy barrel for mag. I thought your advertisign was odd.. but thats all. Some mag owners might feel like they are not informants anymore, but tools.
Just my unbaised, egotistic opinion :).
1) That was not good. It was smart, but not cool. It was an expiriment, a test, and I undersatnd that, but you could have just lost alot of peoples trust. When you post questions or descriptions of new products, some people will think "Is he testing us again?" I do understand that companies have to test the marketing waters now and then, but doing that to your trusty AO is risky.
2) Some of us thought you had gone insane. Verdict still pending on that one.
3) We desreved it. Well, no we didn't, but basically you kinda of did to us like what the "got hit by superbolt" kid did to you. I'm not sayign you lied, I'm sure all that you said was true, but it was a kick in the face. Now, all of hte sudden, trying to market a 10 year old barrel like it was brand spankin new and the best in the world.
4) Your fellow followers may have thought this was hte best thing and spent 20$ that they could have put toward soemthign they really needed, like a warp, a new gun, skitz pills.. etc. I'm not saying that 20$ for that thing isn't worht it.. it is... but still. You could have mislead soem people.
Well.. You didn't do anything to me.... No mag = no need to buy barrel for mag. I thought your advertisign was odd.. but thats all. Some mag owners might feel like they are not informants anymore, but tools.
Just my unbaised, egotistic opinion :).




then after some well respected people here on the forums started to post that tom had gone mad or was overworked or was abusing glue we start to see the majority of posts wondering what is going on. toward the end there are very few who say they are going to actually buy the crown point or if they do they state their reason as being the price. imagine tom's relief as his trust in these forums is validated. we do not blindly follow him. we will not fall for the ploys he used. THAT was the true purpose to the Crown Point Affair.
Comment