It was just my opinion, even though you think it may be a bit misguided. Quite honestly, I feel the basic design of the current generation line of Dye markers is very similar to the general design of that of the very first Matrices. If you can show me that the DM6 contains no operational and mechanical similarities between it's much older counterpart, then I will agree with you that my original post was wrong. However, that is not the case. Essentially, that is all I was saying about it in my first post.
Also, the statement that the DM6 is a "5 year old design that was revamped" isn't exactly a completely false statement. Has the Matrix not, from year to year, turned into the DM6? Hasn't all of these improvements led us to the DM6? Keep in mind that tgis is not necessarily a negative conotation. Essentially, all I meant by my orginal statement was that all this "new technology" (yes, there is some with the DM6) is being overhyped.
If an LPR is so vital to the function of a modern Shocker, why is it that they are on such a small percentage of the Shockers out there today functioning without them?
I'm not out to get into an arguement here. I completely understand your point of view and what you are saying. All I am trying to do is back up my statements while trying to understand even more your points.
Also, the statement that the DM6 is a "5 year old design that was revamped" isn't exactly a completely false statement. Has the Matrix not, from year to year, turned into the DM6? Hasn't all of these improvements led us to the DM6? Keep in mind that tgis is not necessarily a negative conotation. Essentially, all I meant by my orginal statement was that all this "new technology" (yes, there is some with the DM6) is being overhyped.
If an LPR is so vital to the function of a modern Shocker, why is it that they are on such a small percentage of the Shockers out there today functioning without them?
I'm not out to get into an arguement here. I completely understand your point of view and what you are saying. All I am trying to do is back up my statements while trying to understand even more your points.

Comment