Originally posted by rkjunior303
Simple. Efficiency is determined by the inherent design of the valve. Blow forwards will always be less efficient than poppets. Tom tried, and the benefits were marginal. 10% at best, he said. So if you get 1000 balls now, youll get a whole extra 100 balls. Not enough to warrant the cost of a re-design, or the title "new & improved". How much is anyone willing to pay for an extra 100 balls?
Ever wonder why no company has ever put out statistical evidence on their "efficiency mods"....because most of them dont do ANYTHING. Its hype. Magic fairy dust that you sprinkle on your marker combined with the placebo effect. They cant put out the numbers, because the numbers cant be duplicated. Wouldnt want to say "you can get 1500 shots of this", then be proven wrong when the marker doesnt do that and have to take all your product back. So instead they tell you its lighter, and how that alone should solve your efficiency issues...but make no promises so they arent responsible when it doesnt do what it says it will do.
Just like 99.9999% of all barrels do the EXACT same thing. Its a tube. But that special spiralling you have, or the fact its 16" barrel is going to somehow give you more distance on a projectile with a limited velocity of 300 fps.
AGD re-vamped their whole line between 2001-2004. If the "new" approach didnt work then, what makes anyone think doing the same thing will have a different result.



Comment