So...How's it going?

[Nobody]

You are a F%$#king hypocrite. You have insulted me many times, and even made comments about my little girl.

And you and the rest haven't insulted me countless times? People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. And your little girl, she is an innocent, and I only mentioned her, never said anything about her. Get it right!

I read and comprehended what you stated and wholeheartedly disagree. There is so much crap in what you regurgitate that there is no point in even responding to the lies and misrepresentations that you spew. Have you lost any rights? I haven't.

It is not about what I have lost, it is about what I could loose and what is being taken away. Women have lost certain rights. Brown and black people have lost certain rights. And I could loose rights if people who cannot give up power, who cannot afford to have people not agree with how things are run. As well as, I will not have one narrative spoken here, just because it goes against the rules but not personal beliefs on this forum. So, shove that in your peace pipe and smoke it.

It is funny to see what trash you'll write next.

Fiction is your forte.

It's funny anytime you write anything that avoids a subject. You dance around a topic, but then play the victim card.

Not that it matters, but pyrate jym said that trump never lost a jury trial, but there was the E Jean Carrol case, and then there was nothing but crickets. But you never say anything, except about those personal attacks. And where I have tried to reach out, talk to you personally, so we can come to agreement, like friends and... you avoid me. You won't face the fact that you are wrong, that you can't act like an adult or a man cause you can't face that someone has the temerity to disagree with you.

You are pitiful. All hail the mighty Dirge mod. So glad Dirge made that.

[Loguzzzzzz]

And you and the rest haven't insulted me countless times? People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. And your little girl, she is an innocent, and I only mentioned her, never said anything about her. Get it right!



It is not about what I have lost, it is about what I could loose and what is being taken away. Women have lost certain rights. Brown and black people have lost certain rights. And I could loose rights if people who cannot give up power, who cannot afford to have people not agree with how things are run. As well as, I will not have one narrative spoken here, just because it goes against the rules but not personal beliefs on this forum. So, shove that in your peace pipe and smoke it.



It's funny anytime you write anything that avoids a subject. You dance around a topic, but then play the victim card.

Not that it matters, but pyrate jym said that trump never lost a jury trial, but there was the E Jean Carrol case, and then there was nothing but crickets. But you never say anything, except about those personal attacks. And where I have tried to reach out, talk to you personally, so we can come to agreement, like friends and... you avoid me. You won't face the fact that you are wrong, that you can't act like an adult or a man cause you can't face that someone has the temerity to disagree with you.

You are pitiful. All hail the mighty Dirge mod. So glad Dirge made that.

I play the victim??? That's a laugh! your the one that plays victim crying about orange man bad...

I glad dirge did it too. just meant I didn't have to do them all.....

I don't want to call to discuss anything. We are diametrically opposed there is no way we could ever come to any understanding.

[Pyrate Jim]

Not that it matters, but pyrate jym said that trump never lost a jury trial, but there was the E Jean Carrol case, and then there was nothing but crickets.

I disputed a claim and asked you to show proof. You came up with the only one.
What did you expect? A laurel and hearty handshake? I am under no obligation to respond, and you give me few reasons to.
We both have the same right to freedom of speech (within the bounds of civility and good taste set by the AO board).
We also have the right to not listen to idiots. You might want to practice that one a bit more because your indoctrination is blatant.

[Nobody]

I disputed a claim and asked you to show proof. You came up with the only one.
What did you expect? A laurel and hearty handshake? I am under no obligation to respond, and you give me few reasons to.
We both have the same right to freedom of speech (within the bounds of civility and good taste set by the AO board).
We also have the right to not listen to idiots. You might want to practice that one a bit more because your indoctrination is blatant.

How about acknowledgement? It doesn't matter how many(though I will say there's going to be more coming), and coming off the top of my head, there is one. I also believe the Trump University case, was also decided by a jury, but have to check that. So basically, if anything, admit when you are wrong when you not only make a false statement, as well as presented with facts that contradict what you believe.

And your last point, I do try, but 2hen the idiots come running, telling all these false and wrong statements like the election was stolen, trump never lost a court case, or the like. As much as I want to ignore you, I have to educate you on the facts and truth of thr matter. So sorry, I am ruining an idiot's right to spew lies.

[Pyrate Jim]

How about acknowledgement?

Someone feeling entitled to something they haven't earned?
I said "pics or shens" and you made a statement without the accompanying pics or links. Then said everyone else is a liar.

I understand you have neuroses, but you're starting to make Woody Allen look like the Buddha by comparison.

[Pyrate Jim]

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zsbprZvo4Ys

[Nobody]

Someone feeling entitled to something they haven't earned?
I said "pics or shens" and you made a statement without the accompanying pics or links. Then said everyone else is a liar.

I understand you have neuroses, but you're starting to make Woody Allen look like the Buddha by comparison.

First off, even if I provided a link, there is no way of knowing that you used it. Plus, I know for a fact that none of you would even dain to use any link I would have provided. So I don't have to provide a link. I also am basing this off of common knowledge, i.e. you know, or should know about the 83mil that was the judgment against trump, so it is not a false statement. So putting 2 & 2 together, you have a court case that trump lost that was a jury trial.

A picture? That's laughable. All you have to do is look at trump whining about the lady that he doesn't know and the corrupt judgements against him.

So the key here is, none of you have shown anything to prove that you are not lying, or you are not telling the truth. Sure, opinions are personal, and aren't subject to right or wrong. But because you support the many lies from your grifter god, oft repeating them without care, then you too are a liar. And to have you acknowledge when you are wrong, means that you can learn and maybe adjuat your viewpoint. It is the humble pie that we all should eat more of. But when you go on, about this and that, never sticking to one subject, changing your attacks, you do nothing to even support what you have to say. Which knocks out any credibility to what you have to say.

[Pyrate Jim]

I know for a fact that none of you would even dain to use any link I would have provided. So I don't have to provide a link. I also am basing this off of common knowledge.

Very common, apparently. Show me uncommon, higher than average.

1. I didn't watch the parade.
2. I didn't watch any of the news in the past couple of days
3. I am not on social media, so no one has shown links to it
4. You mentioned a parade, which without context and/or reference could mean Podunk, any state parade, not a national one.
5. You assumed facts not presented. I can't know a thing you don't mention
6. While it always appears I know everything, the reality of it is, I do not. I just know a lot about a lot of things.

Except the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade.

But when you go on, about this and that, never sticking to one subject, changing your attacks, you do nothing to even support what you have to say. Which knocks out any credibility to what you have to say.

One subject? Which one would that be? Something you agree with, perhaps?
My focus is not so narrow. It's a big, wide world out there with a lot going on. I have given many links to accredited sources and take credit for none. Sometimes I add commentary that supports them, but they do not support me, nor have I any need for support. I don't need "acknowledgment" or even expect it. Least of all from you.

A picture? That's laughable. All you have to do is look at trump whining about the lady that he doesn't know and the corrupt judgements against him.

Glad to see you admit the judgements against Trump are corrupt. There may be hope for you yet.

[Nobody]

Very common, apparently. Show me uncommon, higher than average.

Well, I don't have to show you anything. This isn't a list, this was just proving you wrong. You asked for a court case in which a jury found him guilty and I did. So no, you dont get to move the goal posts, you don't have to alter what you meant. You asked and I answered. If you don't like the answer or truth, then give trump some of your money and maybe he can hire better lawyers.

Except the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade.

Wow, talk about digging up a zombie post. Going back 6 months, to prove what?

One subject? Which one would that be? Something you agree with, perhaps?
My focus is not so narrow. It's a big, wide world out there with a lot going on. I have given many links to accredited sources and take credit for none. Sometimes I add commentary that supports them, but they do not support me, nor have I any need for support. I don't need "acknowledgment" or even expect it. Least of all from you.

No, links to butthurt youtubers that only want to show off bad editing skills and "owning the libs" is not credible, nor is using a what ever search engine to pull links off some hack way bent "news sourc3" just because it tells you what you want to read. Try the AP.

Again, you putting in what you think is news, is fine, except for it being political in nature. Which is against the rules. But this is the rub. With what you do, you only flood the post with posts and never want to discuss it. Anything you post is hollow and without substance.

Glad to see you admit the judgements against Trump are corrupt. There may be hope for you yet.

See, you only believe in false statements. Of course I was "lying" about that, to prove a point. I find it funny that you don't believe the truth and only believe in the lies. Sad really. When are you going to open your eyes?

[Pyrate Jim]

Of course I was "lying" about that, to prove a point.

So now you admit to telling lies to substantiate your ridiculous claims, while calling everyone else a liar?
ING-SOC must be proud of you.

[Pyrate Jim]

I found this amusing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-is-flush-with-cash-but-that-s-not-why-trump-should-be-worried/ar-BB1kN3Gq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=64b0e392ffde4c28ad38867019f5f348&ei=12

This quote made me chuckle.

The polls might be tight, but President Joe Biden is trouncing former President Donald Trump in the race for campaign cash. Following a star-studded New York City fundraiser that hauled in over $26 million in just a few hours, it’s clear Biden has a financial advantage over his embattled challenger.

The context is a Joe Biden fundraiser with Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, stage shows by lizzo and many hollywood celebs. Face it, Biden was on the "B" list at that event.

It's just so nice that all these elites can afford tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars just to get in the door to support Biden, spending $26 million while Donald Trump is supported by the other % of people that have to choose between either contribute money to his campaign or pay for groceries thanks to "Bidenomics".

And here's a odd imagining ~ the Democrat party, with the media and Executive Branch seem to think they are Wiley E. Coyote (super genius) with all the backing of the Acme Corporation, always seem to fall off a cliff, drop a rock on themselves or blow themselves up. Meanwhile the roadrunner Trump just goes "Beep-Beep" and ends the show in a cloud of dust.
Politically, this country is a Merrie Melodies / Looney Tunes cartoon.

[Pyrate Jim]

What's this? Some kind of test run before November?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dDYwOxgvAs

I guess practicing shenanigans on each other before trying them in general elections doesn't draw as much attention.

[Nobody]

I found this amusing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-is-flush-with-cash-but-that-s-not-why-trump-should-be-worried/ar-BB1kN3Gq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=64b0e392ffde4c28ad38867019f5f348&ei=12

This quote made me chuckle.

The context is a Joe Biden fundraiser with Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, stage shows by lizzo and many hollywood celebs. Face it, Biden was on the "B" list at that event.

It's just so nice that all these elites can afford tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars just to get in the door to support Biden, spending $26 million while Donald Trump is supported by the other % of people that have to choose between either contribute money to his campaign or pay for groceries thanks to "Bidenomics".

And here's a odd imagining ~ the Democrat party, with the media and Executive Branch seem to think they are Wiley E. Coyote (super genius) with all the backing of the Acme Corporation, always seem to fall off a cliff, drop a rock on themselves or blow themselves up. Meanwhile the roadrunner Trump just goes "Beep-Beep" and ends the show in a cloud of dust.
Politically, this country is a Merrie Melodies / Looney Tunes cartoon.

Oh pity you. Cry some more while I cool my feet in the river of your tears....

Anymore crying over the fact that trump can only get the likes of Kid Rock and the pillow guy?

While I do not like the exorbitant costs of a fundraiser like this, there were more affordable tickets to an event like this. Also consider that, while Clinton and Obama are former presidents, the security necessary for them and the sitting president requires a little more. So high security, former presidents, the need to vet every person attending; it is not a Nuremberg rally.

But wait, I thought tru.p was a Billionaire who doesn't need anyone's money and donations? Did I get that wrong, or is it the simple fact that as much as the people who donate see their money going to legal fees, instead of a presidential election? I guess you are stuck with $400 sneakers that may come in a year of purchase. Guess you can pray on your $60 trump Bible, all the while smelling like a champ with his perfume.

So which is it? Does Biden economics mean that no one has any money, or that the people who don't support a con artist don't have any money?

[CitsejaMkraDehT]

So uh sorry to disrupt this conversation..... with so many "people" viewing this forum ..... is it likely most of them are just bots?

[Pyrate Jim]

So uh sorry to disrupt this conversation..... with so many "people" viewing this forum ..... is it likely most of them are just bots?

No disruption, in fact welcome.
Number of "views" is immaterial, only those who post add relevance to the discussion. Any input is appreciated.
Let others look. Even if they are bots, I'm sure they enjoy the comedy.