So...How's it going?

[Beemer]

9k, I think..

A fork in the road is direction, if taken literally. Now I personally tend to go down the path least traveled. Same proverbial fork, but one that doesn't have a bias to my views. As if I chose to only go down a path predetermined by viewpoints, then it would be neither left or right(which I believe you are trying to shoehorn in a political spectrum), as I am not making a choice, only viewing either as the best fit, as it were.

In your model, you are absolutely biased, as you will go down the right path, even though you are "curious" about the left, but have to be overly convinced to go AGAINST your own bias, to go to the right. You are conflating the bias and prejudice, as they are the same. You PRE-JUDGE that the right path is what you will always take, so your bias is to the right. The left could be interesting and different, but have to go against your own judgement or "BIAS", in order to take it.

Bunch of bla bla bla trying to sound deeper than you really are.

[going_home]

There will be a national IQ test on Tuesday 11/5/2024.

Maybe there will be a debate before that so she can prove she has the best cackle of all....

Wait, she has a law degree ?

[maniacmechanic]

yes people are feeling and doing better, cause we aren't dying of covid.

lmao

[Loguzzzzzz]

Wait, she has a law degree?

Maybe she sucked her way there too?!

[Nobody]

Maybe she sucked her way there too?!

And there is the misogyny.

Now do me a favor, substitute your daughter's name(the older one, obviously) in what you said. How would you feel? Let's belittle every single accomplishment she ever done, just because you feel threatened by a woman who has done a hell of a lot more than anyone here.

[going_home]

And there is the misogyny.

Now do me a favor, substitute your daughter's name(the older one, obviously) in what you said. How would you feel? Let's belittle every single accomplishment she ever done, just because you feel threatened by a woman who has done a hell of a lot more than anyone here.

Pretty certain he doesn't have any 59 year old daughters, but nice try.

She showed up at Willie Browns birthday party when his wife was there.

That pretty much sums up her character.

Don't deflect into some other bunny trail because the truth hurts.....

[Loguzzzzzz]

And there is the misogyny.

Now do me a favor, substitute your daughter's name(the older one, obviously) in what you said. How would you feel? Let's belittle every single accomplishment she ever done, just because you feel threatened by a woman who has done a hell of a lot more than anyone here.

Nice try with the deflection. The bottom line here is that Kamala did do that. I know, I know....

[Nobody]

Pretty certain he doesn't have any 59 year old daughters, but nice try.

She showed up at Willie Browns birthday party when his wife was there.

That pretty much sums up her character.

Don't deflect into some other bunny trail because the truth hurts.....

Give you a little hint, it doesn't matter how old, it is the fact that you think she has to.

So what do you say about white supremacists?

Nice try with the deflection. The bottom line here is that Kamala did do that. I know, I know....

Oh yes, I will file that in with the plethora of people attesting to the Biden crime syndicate, all the evidence of voter fraud, thr people who planted the secret documents, the faked moon landing records, the Bigfoot skeletons and the Martin's that are still alive and well from Area 51.

[Nobody]

And here is the definition of the word deflect/deflection, cause you idiots have no clue.

cause (something) to change direction by*interposing*something; turn aside from a straight course.
"the bullet was deflected harmlessly into the ceiling"

(of an object) change direction after hitting something.
"the ball*deflected off*his body"

cause (someone) to*deviate*from an intended purpose.
"she refused to be*deflected from*anything she had set her mind on"

So when I con5inue a thought from Loguzzzzzzo, and ask if you would say those things, inserting his child in that topic, it is not a deflection. I know, you guys are so arsed backwards with loving dictators, not not freedom; praising fiscal responsibility, but your guy literally spent more money than all other presidential administration combined; and of course, the whole getting rid of the constitution. Moral quandary. But hey, that's what living in a cilult will do. Ya just don't know right from wrong anymore. It's bizarre world, and you are the window lockers of it.

[Beemer]

^^^Tired of your CONSTANT FLAMING. WAY WAY more then anyone else here. Not to mention your trolling. Mr against the rules. Take 5

[Tunaman]

^^^Tired of your CONSTANT FLAMING. WAY WAY more then anyone else here. Not to mention your trolling. Mr against the rules. Take 5

[Pyrate Jim]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dems-aren-t-even-hiding-it-kamala-harris-promises-mass-amnesty-and-more-illegal-immigration/ar-BB1qUrru?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=ec08c3dd06fd49678f94bd25b0a8c911&ei=53

So much for the border czar.
<edit to add>
Apparently, there's more.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-poll-sinks-dems-hopes-that-voters-will-forget-all-about-kamala-harris-record-on-immigration/ar-BB1qXtd5?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=204c29b942204caaa81ba733eb9497a5&ei=109

[Beemer]

More FUZZY math. Two and two are eight.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/07/30/debunking-claims-that-the-biden-administration-has-replenished-the-spr/

On July 29, multiple news outlets reported that the Biden Administration has replenished the 180 million barrels of oil it removed from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. One headline read “U.S. Restores SPR to pre-2022 Levels.”

“The Biden administration says it has replenished the 180 million barrels of oil it withdrew from the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve in response to high prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

It is absolutely false that the SPR has been replenished.

The reporting seems to be a misreading of the following precisely-worded commentary by Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm:

“As promised, we have secured the 180 million barrels back to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve released in response to Putin’s war in Ukraine – and we accomplished this while getting a good deal for taxpayers and maintaining the readiness of the world’s largest Strategic Petroleum Reserve.”

Let’s review what’s happened here, because these comments have resulted in confused reports on the outcome.

President Joe Biden inherited an SPR at 638 million barrels when he took office in January 2021. However, first in response to rising gasoline prices, and then as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, President Biden announced the most aggressive SPR drawdown in history.

At its low point in July 2023, the SPR was drawn down by 288 million barrels, although some of that was due to congressionally-mandated sales. Since then, the Biden Administration has made a few purchases to put oil back in the SPR. But, as of the week ending July 19, SPR levels had only risen 27.7 million barrels from the low point. That is only 9.6% of the oil that was removed from the SPR.

Today, the SPR is still 260.6 million barrels below the level it was when Joe Biden was inaugurated. There is an obvious disconnect in that and what is being reported.

Here is the confusion explained. Secretary Granholm and the DOE said that they initially removed 180 million barrels in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This doesn’t account for all the oil that was removed since Biden took office, so that’s the first error in reports that it has been replenished to pre-2022 levels (which were >600 million barrels).

But note the full context of the DOE press release, which wasn’t widely reported:

“On top of the 140 million barrels of oil secured by working with Congress to cancel previously-mandated sales, this brings the total purchased or kept in the SPR since 2022 to 180 million barrels – the full amount sold following the unprecedented Russian war against Ukraine.”

What exactly are they saying here? Well, the first thing they are doing is taking credit for barrels that have yet to be delivered. They have crafted a minor SPR purchase into creating an impression that they have replaced 180 million barrels of oil that were removed from the SPR.

But the most important aspect of the story is that the DOE worked with Congress to cancel previously-mandated sales. So, it wasn’t that 140 million barrels were put back, they are saying they avoided depleting it by another 140 million barrels in the future.

So, it is absolutely false that the SPR has been replenished to pre-2022 levels. This reporting is based on a misunderstanding of the DOE’s comments, which seem designed to imply that 180 million barrels were put back into the SPR.

Today, the SPR remains over 40% below the level it was when Joe Biden took office, and it will remain at approximately that level through the election.

[going_home]

Give you a little hint, it doesn't matter how old, it is the fact that you think she has to.

So what do you say about white supremacists?

That my friends is what is called a "truth hurts deflection".

Its a fact that the cackle queen was mayor of San Francisco Willie Browns side chick, and that she showed up at his birthday party while he wife was there.

https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/willie-brown-kamala-harris-background-ex-boyfriend-j570nt95w

Her lack of honesty and good moral character is "amazing" as Jesse Lee Peterson often says.

[going_home]

https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1819159519379050663