So...How's it going?

[going_home]

Thank you

[Nobody]

Wrong again as usual.


[ATTACH=CONFIG]103737[/ATTACH]

https://www.investopedia.com/us-debt-by-president-dollar-and-percentage-7371225

You don't know what facts are. Just like you said the SPR was refilled. Wrong

Seems you really don't know as much as you think you do and what you think you know is mostly wrong.

There are many ways to skin an orange. Going off just the percentages does not reflect how much was changed by the end of their term of office. Especially when, even that link does not even establish what was the rate of change or what the president came into office with and when they left office. You have to lay out from what and what it has changed to, to have any revelancy. You know a start, and an end point. But if gibberish is what you think proves your point, then stick with gibberish.

Now I will say that was the information that I had, at the time. If I am wrong, so be it. It is not below me to say I was wrong, as I am big enough to admit it when I am wrong. Are any of you?

And also, it really doesn't matter. It neither effects us, politically, nor does it matter monetarily. We all pay at the pump, and if you have stocks, good for you. I see the release as a market push to try to do good for the economy. If you want to go down with trump, to actually destroy the economy, to have trump start tariff wars, to turn a very soft recession into a major depression. Vote for the "candidate". Holding onto something like the SPR and not using it for the benefit of the citizens is a miserly way of doing business. Kinda like saying "to think of the children or grandchildren", but destroy today before they even have a chance.

[Pyrate Jim]

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/z_ykL38QG-I?feature=share

I want this print.

[BigEvil]

"project 2025"

Say you are a retarded propagandist without saying you are a retarded propagandist LOLOLOL

What a tool. I feel so bad for you.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[BigEvil]

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[Nobody]

Don't go blaming me. I have been retired since July 1st.

And it was the boat's fault. The vessel lost power and i would guess that the currents pushed the boat into the bridge. Not an uncommon occurrence, but one that can end up just like that. Ocean currents, wind and normal ship handling during an opening can get a bit Harry, especially not under power.

You would actually be surprised what is not reported or doesn't make the news.

[going_home]

You would actually be surprised what is not reported or doesn't make the news.

No actually not surprised at all, since 2016.

And especially the theft of a presidential election in 2020 and the lack of reporting on the Biden crime family acceptance of bribes from the chicoms.

Congratulations on your government powered new lifestyle.

[Pyrate Jim]

And especially the theft of a presidential election in 2020 and the lack of reporting on the Biden crime family acceptance of bribes from the chicoms.

Seriously, that's why Trump was never charged with insurrection.
Trump tried what was it? 56 times to bring it to court and not a single one went to litigation. Every case thrown out on some technicality before any Judge could review the evidence.
Trump still has that evidence, and if they officially charge him, He can bring it forward in his defense.
There's a high probability that searching for that evidence was the basis of the Mar-A-Lago raid.

[Nobody]

No actually not surprised at all, since 2016.

And especially the theft of a presidential election in 2020 and the lack of reporting on the Biden crime family acceptance of bribes from the chicoms.

Congratulations on your government powered new lifestyle.

And there it is.

Guess what snowflake, there was no theft. You wanna know why? Cause you can bring any number of theories, rhetoric and heresy you want, but in the end, there was no proof to any allegations. You went to the courts, and they either dismissed, threw out or didn't even hear the case cause there was no evidence.

As for the Biden crime family. After nearly 4 years of accusations, an impeachment inquiry and all the crack investigation teams looking into this, what did they find? But wait, the Biden DOJ is burying it?!?! And to that, why would they bury something so damaging, but let the president's own son get convicted, when the president could have easily and legally, pardon him?

So let's say it together. Trump is a looser. The only thing he excels at is loosing. He lost the house, he then lost the Senate, he then lost the white house. Most, if not all of his picks for house and senate seats lost. Sure, you can't win a primary without trump, but you can't win a general with him.

He lost his charities.
He lost his university
He lost his airline.
He lost his casinos.
He lost, plain and simple.

He is just a looser that sold you a bill of goods that he can't do good on.

[Nobody]

Sorry, you are going off on your own tangent from Allan there.

Seriously, that's why Trump was never charged with insurrection.just because he wasn't charged with insurrection, doesn't negate the other charges of election interference, stealing secret and classified documents, fraud, and all the other charges he has
Trump tried what was it? 56 times to bring it to court and not a single one went to litigation. litigation is the legal name for a court case. The trump team 64 cases and lost 63 of them. Every case thrown out on some technicality before any Judge could review the evidence. not every case was thrown out on some technicality, but whether it is technicalities or the fact that the team had no evidence to put forth(there are multiple cases where the judge asked the lawyers for evidenceand the defense said they had nothing). So it means that they had no case at all
Trump still has that evidence, and if they officially charge him, He can bring it forward in his defense. so, if he has evidence, why didn't he bring it back in 2020? It would not only prove his claims but exonerate him. He had ample opportunitiesto present evidence, prove his claims in court but it was merely the rambles of an old man who lost the election
There's a high probability that searching for that evidence was the basis of the Mar-A-Lago raid. well, the warrant, of which you can surely look up, was stated specifically what it was looking for, classified and secret documents that were in possessionof Trump. The federal government is kind of a stickler on specifics, as it doesn't want to give the defense an easy out for mishandling the case.

An innocent man doesn't wait to the last day to prove their innocence. No one hides the evidence that they have for a special day, down the road and a thief got caught with property belonging to another. Is it one man who has run rough shod through the legal system because it is against him or is it merely a liar and a thief, who speaks those words of promise in your ears, taking you along for a ride, because you are easily duped and lobe the red meat he throws out to you? You put away all the integrity and all the morals just because he made you feel good, without giving anything tangible back?

[going_home]

The Obama appointed judges in every case refused to see the evidence of election theft/interference.

Obama is a communist so its no surprise his appointments would rule as they did.

But to say there's no proof of election theft/interference you just have your head in the sand and refuse the truth.

Thank you for pointing out what defines you, snowflake:

"Snowflake is a derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."

[Nobody]

The Obama appointed judges in every case refused to see the evidence of election theft/interference.

Obama is a communist so its no surprise his appointments would rule as they did.

But to say there's no proof of election theft/interference you just have your head in the sand and refuse the truth.

Thank you for pointing out what defines you, snowflake:

"Snowflake is a derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."

But what about all the republican and Trump appointed judges that dismissed the cases? And if there was proof of the judges not looking at evidence, which there is/was none, then you would have a problem.

Obama is a communist? Good thing he never held an elected position like senator or, dare I say, President of thr United States.

If there is tangible proof, where is it? Trump has the biggest pulpit in the world, and yet he cannot prove a damned lie, cause he knows it's a lie and as long as you keep believing his cow manure, he keeps telling you it. You fooled yourself, and continue to be the fool. So when everyone tells you the grass is green and the sky is blue, maybe they are correct and you are wrong.

Oh, sorry. I forgot that only the right can insult people and the left can only take it. You would have more credence if you didn't just insult and brought actual facts to the table. Sorry, not sorry.

[going_home]

So out of all the dismissive judges only one Pennsylvania judge was a republican appointment, and lets not forget its the same thing with all the ridiculous law fare against Trump now.

The only one thats giving him a fair shake is the one lone republican appointed judge in Florida, the land of the free and home of the armed.

So yeah, all the republican appointed judges in the well proven election fraud of 2020, you mean one in red Pennsylvania.

There is plenty of actual video of the fraud if you cared to watch it.

If I spent hours posting it you wouldnt watch it anyway.

Not to mention the testimony of the truck driver testifying of just one of many truckload of fraudulent mail in ballots that were counted but never mailed.

[going_home]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/election-2024-beware-usps

[Nobody]

So out of all the dismissive judges only one Pennsylvania judge was a republican appointment, and lets not forget its the same thing with all the ridiculous law fare against Trump now.

No. I do not know if the judge in PA, who did a partial win for trump, is a republican. But in the 64 cases brought to judgement, many were republicans, some were even appointed by trump. The facts of all those cases does not lie in what the judge's personal politics are but if the case brought before them is within the law or not.

The only one thats giving him a fair shake is the one lone republican appointed judge in Florida, the land of the free and home of the armed.

No. Judge Cannon has already had 2 mishaps and is coming to a 3rd and final one. But ironically it seems that the only case that trump appears to be winning is one were the judge can thank him for her job. Can anyone say nepotism? How about favoritism? How about judicial misconduct?

So yeah, all the republican appointed judges in the well proven election fraud of 2020, you mean one in red Pennsylvania.

Judges are asked to hear cases and use the law not personal beliefs in judgment. You need to look at it, not that everyone is againstTrump, just that trump is actually guilty of the crimes he has committed.

There is plenty of actual video of the fraud if you cared to watch it.

John, because 1) what I have to say, other than it has already been disproven to show any evidence of wrongdoing, is my opinion doesn't matter. 2) if this was evidence, why didn't the crack trump legal team present it, and if they did, then the judge and the court deemed it to not be what you think it is. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, you can't call it a Zebra.

If I spent hours posting it you wouldnt watch it anyway.

You really want me to think even less about you than I already do? Should I start laughing now, or wait for you to post countless, hilarious, and farcical videos? Your call...

Not to mention the testimony of the truck driver testifying of just one of many truckload of fraudulent mail in ballots that were counted but never mailed.

So let me get this straight. The trump team, had a chance to interview, then maybe take a affidavit of this guy's statement, bring it forth to the courts as evidence and it still didn't work? So either it was bubkis or the lawyers that trump hired were so incompetent that they screwed up this damning evidence that would prove to all us liberals and to the world that trump was telling the truth and the election was stolen.

Nope, it was and still is, a bit of red meat that you pin all your hopes onto because you are to daft to see the wood through the trees, understand that trump is a conman and is taking you for every gold spray paintedsneaker he can from you and your ilk.