IDK, try actually using a link that is believable? Not cherry picking data to tell a certain narrative? That is not telling porky pies, getting the gullible to believe what they want, not the truth?
Shoe on the other foot. If I used that link, would you believe me? If that link said, that trump is a fecalphiliac, and plays with dolls. I mean, it came from some website right? It has to be true right? Random websites just don't write anything in hopes that it drives views, which they make money off advertising off of? And the certainly don't want to feed their base into exactly what they want to hear, regardless of the truth, so that they can continue the one narrative and keep you in the dark about a lot of other things.
Shoe on the other foot. If I used that link, would you believe me? If that link said, that trump is a fecalphiliac, and plays with dolls. I mean, it came from some website right? It has to be true right? Random websites just don't write anything in hopes that it drives views, which they make money off advertising off of? And the certainly don't want to feed their base into exactly what they want to hear, regardless of the truth, so that they can continue the one narrative and keep you in the dark about a lot of other things.






Comment