Someone should call the whitehouse and talk to one of their secretaries. I wonder if they'd release that kind of info... mabye I will.
-
-
Whilst I may not agree with his opinion, my insult was mainly due to his lack of respect for Tunaman and his thread. I'm sure Tuna had no intentions of starting a political debate.Originally posted by MayAMonkeyBeYourPinata
He is not really an idiot, just a person who expresses his opinion crudely, and with no supporting evidence.
For whatever reason, greg felt the need to share his opinion, crudely as you stated, with no intention of adding anything of meaning to the thread, simply just being an idiot and being the catalyst that will more than likely spark a political debate.
But I do agree with you,MayAMonkey..., 100%
Comment
-
Then why didn't you call Rooster an idiot?"What we have to accomplish at this time is all the more clear: relentless criticism of all existing conditions, relentless in the sense that the criticism is not afraid of its findings and just as little afraid of the conflict with the powers that be."
- Karl MarxComment
-
maybe cause he left a pointless comment on his vew of Bush- AGD "Yea well our intention is to
take over the world....one country at a time..... :)" - Rt Pro X Valved Warp fed My Rtp
- Props to Echo for the sig
Comment
- AGD "Yea well our intention is to
-
Thanotos
http://www.factcheck.orgComment
-
no Rooster left a pointless comment on "liberal scum"
and boy do I love snopesLove Will Tear Us ApartComment
-
Well any post about GWB is going to start a debate no matter what the topic is.Originally posted by PolishSausage
I'm sure Tuna had no intentions of starting a political debate.
Good story. I pray for that soldier and the many like him. I also pray that they get all of their disability benifits.
Comment
-
Guys, leave the flaming for PBN. This is AO. BTW good story Tuna.. Comment
-
took the words right outta my mouth..polish's logic is a bit flawed..Originally posted by -Carnifex-
Then why didn't you call Rooster an idiot?Last edited by impostal22; 01-22-2004, 01:57 AM.Comment
-
Why should I offer proof for obvious statements of fact, especially to the likes of you? I would be glad to offer proof to those whom I have faith in their powers of rational thought.
If you don't want to hear from me, don't spew inane liberal crap on the boards.
Comment
-
here, rooster you a flaming retard
happy now
oh and great story, i too pray for the soldiers and appreciate their sacrifices, in my eyes bush is a good man:)Last edited by dansim; 01-22-2004, 03:04 PM.Comment
-
All I have to say, and it's very simple and to the point. God bless America and thank goodness that Bush is our president.
More importantly, to everyone, Republicans and Democrats alike (as well as all others), God bless America.Reign of Fire
Team Captain
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."Comment
-
Hrmm, I wonder how he lost the arm? Isn't Bush the one who started the war? And caused him to lose an arm?
And isn't Bush the one that refused to sign the anti-landmine treaty? I don't see him praying for any civillians that get killed by mines that the US planted.
Prayers don't bring arms back.Comment
-
You'd be wrong on both counts so I am glad you asked!Originally posted by mcveighr
Hrmm, I wonder how he lost the arm? Isn't Bush the one who started the war? And caused him to lose an arm?
And isn't Bush the one that refused to sign the anti-landmine treaty? I don't see him praying for any civillians that get killed by mines that the US planted.
Prayers don't bring arms back.
Saddam Hussien started the war. Way back he attacked his neighbors and then later refused to comply with UN sanctions. Later Clinton signed into law the act that called for his regime to be changed. Then Saddam refused still to comply and ejected the UN inspectors... and so forth until we enforced it.
Secondly it was Clinton that refused to sign the Landmine treaty. Here is a quote from a newspaper aticle from back then:
The Clinton administration says the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to an anti-land mine organization does not change the argument that high-tech "smart mines" will be needed for at least a few more years to protect U.S. troops.
"The president is absolutely rock-solid confident that he's got the right approach," said White House spokesman Mike McCurry.
McCurry said the United States favors eliminating land mines, which kill or maim an estimated 26,000 people a year. But it wants leeway for using land mines in Korea until an alternative weapon can be developed.
Now go study your history some more...Last edited by cphilip; 01-22-2004, 10:35 AM.Comment
-
Ah yes,
Both sides can't resist starting a debate about such an issue.
I don't doubt the story is true. Why wouldn't it be? It would be an amazing thing for a soldier to meet the president. Heck even I would be feel honored if I met GWB and you guys all know I pray for divine intervention in the election so that he will be defeated.
Oh and please don't start going off on "no GOD will support GWB...". Let us not go down that ridiculous road.
Do you know that GWB's father was SHOT DOWN in WWII? Can it be that he almost DIED for his country? Of course it can be.
Just because I totally disagree with GWB's policies doesn't mean that he might not have some good qualities as commader in chief. He made that soldier's life better at that one moment. That is a good thing and I'm glad he did it. Still, however, hoping that he does not get elected in 2004.
For me it is not personal. It is about policy.ULE Body Level 10 Automag intelliframe + retrovalveComment
Comment