intel benchmarks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Heat
    hello lamewads
    • Oct 2000
    • 4463

    #31
    Originally posted by Automaggin2
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...480126586&rd=1



    Very very nice laptop for the money. Extremly fast, too. Great battery life.
    that thing does have alot to offer for the price only a few problems. After my last two asus boards I will never buy asus again. If they can't do onboard sound then I won't touch a laptop by them FOR SURE.
    And the price is WAY out there. I'm thinking like 1200-1400$.The 9100's that dell sells from their factory outlet look like the only ones that are going to be affordable and have the components I need. Their biggest disadvantage.... they are 2" thick.

    I think I've pretty much decited to stay away from centrino stuff. For the markup I can buy a second battery and outlast a centrino by ~1-2 hours and STILL get the processing power for graphic intensive presentations. Beside I doubt I'll ever take it anywhere a 110V jack won't be around

    Comment

    • Bluestrike_2
      Archer
      • Jan 2004
      • 481

      #32
      Originally posted by Buff
      hey, uhm, bluestrike......

      an Athlon -FX with a quality setup can do that, and be cheaper.......

      the reason why Macs have a reputation for photoshop speed is because they have always had a larger cache size then intel's and AMD's.......
      but The FX has twice the cahce size as the barton, and 4 times the cache size as the AXP.

      An equal priced A64 system will be faster then a Mac in everything.
      I am not saying PC's are better......its preference. Some people like chevvy's, some like fords. U pay a premium for macs because they dont have as wide of a market. if they weren't so expensive.......
      Yea, it probably could. BUT....

      Expose makes it actually feasible to do work in such a manner. Sure, Windows has the Taskbar(equivalent on Mac: Dock)Yet, how can you honestly maneuver through 30-40 different open(sometimes MORE)windows.

      On graphics Tablet: Button 16 - Show all windows
      Mouse(multi-button) lower thumb
      Any corner - different Expose functions

      Lower-left = show all
      Upper - left = Show active
      Lower-right = hide all
      upper-right = screensaver
      F11, F12, F13 = Show all, Show Active, Hide All

      Expose has made the world of difference. It is, simply put, amazing. That alone is worth the small price difference(talking in the form of a high-end workstation). Also, Security. Anyone with any knowledge can tell you that *NIX systems(OSX is based off Unix) are more secure than Windows machines. Although I do own two old Windows machines currently running XP Pro.

      Attatchment:

      Yeah, that's Maya open. PLE. As in the free version. Can't afford Complete at 2 grand, or even $500 for the educational pricing. Although I am saving, Strata is a great alternative, and costs a lot less (w/ and w/o discount. Ok, way off topic. Back on.

      The Maya window is a Solar System animation I'm trying to work on.
      "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
      -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

      http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
      http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO

      Comment

      • Heat
        hello lamewads
        • Oct 2000
        • 4463

        #33
        Originally posted by Bluestrike_2
        Yea, it probably could. BUT....

        Expose makes it actually feasible to do work in such a manner. Sure, Windows has the Taskbar(equivalent on Mac: Dock)Yet, how can you honestly maneuver through 30-40 different open(sometimes MORE)windows.

        On graphics Tablet: Button 16 - Show all windows
        Mouse(multi-button) lower thumb
        Any corner - different Expose functions

        Lower-left = show all
        Upper - left = Show active
        Lower-right = hide all
        upper-right = screensaver
        F11, F12, F13 = Show all, Show Active, Hide All

        Expose has made the world of difference. It is, simply put, amazing. That alone is worth the small price difference(talking in the form of a high-end workstation). Also, Security. Anyone with any knowledge can tell you that *NIX systems(OSX is based off Unix) are more secure than Windows machines. Although I do own two old Windows machines currently running XP Pro.

        Attatchment:

        Yeah, that's Maya open. PLE. As in the free version. Can't afford Complete at 2 grand, or even $500 for the educational pricing. Although I am saving, Strata is a great alternative, and costs a lot less (w/ and w/o discount. Ok, way off topic. Back on.

        The Maya window is a Solar System animation I'm trying to work on.

        your comparing operating systems. That's a whole different discussion. Programs don't show how capable a processor is either. Not to mension I can't see a person working with more then 5 or so windows anyway... it gets too confusing for the human ...

        Comment

        • Bluestrike_2
          Archer
          • Jan 2004
          • 481

          #34
          You're right, they don't. It's just that, well, on the first page there are such obvious biases against the Mac. Uniformed opinions coming out of their rears.

          I'm sorry, but the Mac needs supporters in this thread. They're there. Kev, cphillip, me, pain.

          Yeah, it's true the Mac is a graphics machine. That's obvious.

          The OS was brought in because of biases against it earlier. Now, I will be called a Mac fanatic, or a cultist, or some other obscure insult. I'm semi-physic, I can tell....
          "I've always said that Pixar is the most technically advanced creative company; Apple is the most creatively advanced technical company"
          -Apple CEO, Steve Jobs

          http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1025098,00.html - Apple CEO
          http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1572017,00.asp - Adobe CEO

          Comment

          • Heat
            hello lamewads
            • Oct 2000
            • 4463

            #35
            Originally posted by Bluestrike_2
            You're right, they don't. It's just that, well, on the first page there are such obvious biases against the Mac. Uniformed opinions coming out of their rears.

            I'm sorry, but the Mac needs supporters in this thread. They're there. Kev, cphillip, me, pain.

            Yeah, it's true the Mac is a graphics machine. That's obvious.

            The OS was brought in because of biases against it earlier. Now, I will be called a Mac fanatic, or a cultist, or some other obscure insult. I'm semi-physic, I can tell....
            actually to be politicaly correct this was a thread about PC's the mac's came on the scene with the 40th post this week, to the effect of " macs are better " which is more representation then macs needed in a PC thread....I have enough problems with running linux and windows on the same network... I refuse to add another OS until it can do something my other ones can't

            that sounded mean... but I'm too tired to smooth it out. ya'll get the point no offence intended

            Comment

            Working...