Micahel Moore has to change his film title!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lohman446
    Useful posts: 7
    • Jun 2003
    • 9315

    #31
    Originally posted by Kellen_p8nt
    As was stated above It is not plagarism, NOR does he have to change the title of his film. He is protected by parody. And any change he makes would be out of respect for bradbury. So he doesnt have to change the title. THe article failed to mention one of the main reasons why Bradbury is aggravated, a new Fahrenheit 451 movie is coming out om time next year.

    1de. Im new to the word "troll". But given what ive been told it is and the opening of this thread I could easily and justifiably attach the word to your name. Why? Why on earth do you continually open political threads. I heard that was agianst the rules, pardon me if im wrong on that.

    And you can try and defend the opening of this thread as being just a fair reporting of the news. However, you managed to release your own personal opposition to Moore.

    All im saying is starting this thread is asking for worthless politial fights. As we have long established no one, apparently, on this forum can seem to have a decent discourse with another. So all thats going to happen is everyone who everyone here who hates Moore, having seen his movies and read his books or not, is going tocheer and make irrational comments along the lines that have allready been made. Then those who either love Moore, simply oppose the same things he oppose, or those who are agianst the current administration are going to get defensive.


    We can ALL predict that this is exactly what will become of this thread. No one will say anything worhtwhile.

    SO close this thread now please, before we have to ahve another one on the boards.
    We should all bow down to your superior intellect and not have any topics you don't like

    Oh wait, that was sarcastic

    Frankly, if you dont like the topic, dont bother reading it

    Don't come on here and whine about it

    That will keep friendly corner friendly, and let teh mods do there job. The rest of us can just get along

    Illustrated for easier understanding
    "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

    Comment

    • Kellen_p8nt
      Registered User
      • Apr 2003
      • 286

      #32
      Lohman your putting words in my mouth. You dont have to do antyhign I say. I never claimed to have a higher intelect than anyones here.

      Im making a suggestion. Would you like to argue with that suggestion? would you? rather than making poor attacks of the manner in your post? BY making taunting arguements such as that you are only succeding n further bolstering my suggestion.


      I am in no way whining about the topic. And I will read the topic if i feel like it. And like and interest are two different things. I dont like the topic but it interests me.

      And as I said I am not whining about the topic. Michael Moor has been asked by Bradbury to Confront him and like gentlemen discuss the problem and resolve it quietly.

      Thats no problem by me and never will be. My problem is that no one is asking good questions.

      The important facts have allready been citied by those who do no feel the need to behave in a beligerant manner.

      WHat are the fact you may ask?

      Titles of Books cannot be copyribghted, they can be trademarked.
      Fahrenheit 9/11 has the protetion of parody.
      SO since Moore doesnt have to do anything about the name anything he does is out of respect for Bradbury and his amazing book Fahrenheit 451.


      so whatever.
      Originally posted by Rooster
      By a great percentage they are uneducated, religiously fanatical, and completely and hopelessly ignorant.
      Rooster refering to himself and the christian conservatives?

      Comment

      • logamus
        Registered Abuser
        • Dec 2002
        • 2346

        #33
        Originally posted by PissedGodzilla
        Isn't that what the liberals are saying about free speech and Howard Stern etc....

        It's funny you would use a left-wing saying to defend a right winger. That's what us moderates call 'Irony"


        politics
        i am a "right winger" and i support free speech. whats so ironic about that? what i find ironic is how much blood there is in my pants, now THATS irony!!!!111


        My AO Feedback My eBay Feedback
        Havoc-Online.com Protect free speech, stop the FCC

        Comment

        • Lohman446
          Useful posts: 7
          • Jun 2003
          • 9315

          #34
          Originally posted by Kellen_p8nt
          Lohman your putting words in my mouth. You dont have to do antyhign I say. I never claimed to have a higher intelect than anyones here.

          Im making a suggestion. Would you like to argue with that suggestion? would you? rather than making poor attacks of the manner in your post? BY making taunting arguements such as that you are only succeding n further bolstering my suggestion.


          I am in no way whining about the topic. And I will read the topic if i feel like it. And like and interest are two different things. I dont like the topic but it interests me.

          And as I said I am not whining about the topic. Michael Moor has been asked by Bradbury to Confront him and like gentlemen discuss the problem and resolve it quietly.

          Thats no problem by me and never will be. My problem is that no one is asking good questions.

          The important facts have allready been citied by those who do no feel the need to behave in a beligerant manner.

          WHat are the fact you may ask?

          Titles of Books cannot be copyribghted, they can be trademarked.
          Fahrenheit 9/11 has the protetion of parody.
          SO since Moore doesnt have to do anything about the name anything he does is out of respect for Bradbury and his amazing book Fahrenheit 451.


          so whatever.
          You know often I do things just for humor... and perhaps my post was, so soemtimes Im not good at showing it But I thought it was a good chance to use a bunch of the smileys, and vaguely put out a point. But, your right, you have the right to respond.. now we can all laugh about it right
          "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

          Comment

          • 1stdeadeye
            Still around????
            • Jun 2002
            • 8501

            #35
            Originally posted by -Carnifex-
            Has the implication that he hates America. Not to mention, I've heard it said in other threads (not necessarily by you). I'm not sure how you can say someone hates America just because they disagree with your ideology.
            Did you read the next line? Corny WWII movies with all their cliches and NRA/Rush Limbaugh videos.

            Reading, the anti-drug for mistakes!

            Comment

            • -Carnifex-
              Registered User
              • Jan 2003
              • 1434

              #36
              Oh, I see. I thought you meant Pro American movies, WWII, etc.

              Try using semi colons.
              "What we have to accomplish at this time is all the more clear: relentless criticism of all existing conditions, relentless in the sense that the criticism is not afraid of its findings and just as little afraid of the conflict with the powers that be."
              - Karl Marx

              Comment

              • 1stdeadeye
                Still around????
                • Jun 2002
                • 8501

                #37
                Originally posted by Kellen_p8nt
                PG it took me like three trys to figure what you were saying but I get it now.

                It is ironic.

                Im all for 1DE speaking his mind. Its when one knows that hes going to incite beligerance and anger that i disssagree. It seems just silly.

                Im not saying, aka forcing, 1de to not make posts like this. IM showing disagreement with this sort of thing. Which I also can do. Im not going to force 1de to do antyhing. Im asking that we ALL try to tone these posts more towards discourse and less in beligerant arguements.
                Okay, first PG is way off base. I don't care about MM's movie. It is rated R and thus not accessible to childern. Howard Stern is broadcast into everypne's home. Big difference.

                Kellen,
                You need to learn what trolling is. Your doing it.

                If you like Moore, fine then lable him for what he is a political hack. His movies are fiction, not fact. I resent the fraud that he perpatrates passing them off as documentaries. Do you not think he stole that oscar? He took it from real documentary makers!

                Comment

                • 1stdeadeye
                  Still around????
                  • Jun 2002
                  • 8501

                  #38
                  Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
                  As for the torture, maybe strap him into a chair and watch hours and hours of Pro-America movies. Like corny WWII go America movies! Or better yet, NRA promotional videos, or better yet Rush Limbaugh!!!!!
                  How could this be any clearer?

                  Comment

                  • -Carnifex-
                    Registered User
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1434

                    #39
                    Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
                    How could this be any clearer?
                    Because, you put them into two different sentences, where they should be.
                    "What we have to accomplish at this time is all the more clear: relentless criticism of all existing conditions, relentless in the sense that the criticism is not afraid of its findings and just as little afraid of the conflict with the powers that be."
                    - Karl Marx

                    Comment

                    • 1stdeadeye
                      Still around????
                      • Jun 2002
                      • 8501

                      #40
                      Originally posted by -Carnifex-
                      Because, you put them into two different sentences, where they should be.




                      Okay how about this: To torture Michael Moore, we send him to fat camp for the summer!

                      Comment

                      • logamus
                        Registered Abuser
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 2346

                        #41
                        Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
                        Okay, first PG is way off base. I don't care about MM's movie. It is rated R and thus not accessible to childern. Howard Stern is broadcast into everypne's home. Big difference.
                        if the argument is the protection of the first amendment then its not a big difference. btw, i heard that moore was going to appeal his R rating today, anyone hear how that went?

                        [hijack] the problem with stern is the time of day his show is on, and i think thats a very poor reason to attack him. i also love how clearchannel drops him because his show is offensive and they get many complaints about him, then they turn around and file legal papers with the fcc stating that his show is not offensive under fcc rules and there have been no complaints filed about his show. such two faced bastards. [/hijack]


                        My AO Feedback My eBay Feedback
                        Havoc-Online.com Protect free speech, stop the FCC

                        Comment

                        • bofh
                          Waldorf, the Heckler
                          • Jul 2001
                          • 1248

                          #42
                          Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
                          As for the torture, maybe strap him into a chair and watch hours and hours of Pro-America movies. Like corny WWII go America movies! Or better yet, NRA promotional videos, or better yet Rush Limbaugh!!!!!
                          I agree, Rush Limbaugh is clearly torture.
                          Shaun Nelson --- old, fat, slow.... did I mention lazy? I ate all the pies
                          I disable .signatures Apparently you do not.

                          Comment

                          Working...