Originally posted by Recon by Fire
I guess Ford really screwed up.
Collapse
X
-
How the union has the authority to control what Ford allows on there parking lot is anyone's guess. As to Ford, basically there best parking, closest to the plant, is controlled for image purposes. There is another lot across the street that anyone can park in. I don't think it was that unreasonable of an idea."Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess -
Originally posted by Lohman446Getting a job at GM / Chrysler / Ford was considered a gold mine for a semi-skilled trade. Face it, many of the tasks on the line are repetetive, require little thought, and are simple enough. Obviously not all of them, and no doubt some very very smart people do them, but many of the jobs were not a "skilled" trade. That being said, the salaries did/do seem a tad bit excessive when compared to the salaries of skill trades in the same areas of the country. 65K in California, probably not a lot, in St Louis, probably pretty good money.
This sounds way too fimilar to a native Pittsburgher growing up in the 80's. Only replace the Auto industry with the steel industry.
Comment
-
Ford is not the only Union job; my point was broder than just the ford situation; as many have already made blanket statements in this thread i figured i would toss mine in as well. Many factorys did kill and seriously injure workers before unions; maybe now is payback as unions cripple the auto industry.Originally posted by Recon by FireI don't think Ford kills too many employees...
Originally posted by Recon by FireThis is not n American phenom, it is akin to every society where humans are involved. It is a human flaw, not an American flaw. And NO union is going to pay you a buck to join, it will be quite the opposite! You will pay them for the priveledge if being at their mercy and continue to do so every payday...don't complain either or they will make sure you never work.I would have fun arguing with you about the corruption in the timber industry. For example they are allowed (just as oil companys are) to claim any resource they pull out of their land as a "loss" because thet timber isnt there to be logged out in futhure years. I bet all companys wish they could claim a loss on every unit shipped.Originally posted by Recon by FireDamn them, BIG TIMBER! No timber for war!
Tom was the last of a now extinct breed, a breed of players who build a community, a breed of owners who gave to the sport never taking more than what they deserved. I hope to see you at the feild again some day....Comment
-
Hey, if a person is worth $65k a year to a company, more power to them. I could care less if it's being a lawyer, surgeon, or trash collector. What I don't agree with is the fact that unions, generally speaking, keep wages articficially high. Even then, I really don't care. I just don't like to hear people compain about getting laid off when their union contributed to the fiscal problems. If the market price for a factory worker is $65k then what are they complaining about, just get another job at $65k.Originally posted by latherIf you are not planning on owning your own house, sending your kids to college, or taking a yearly vacation then yes, thats overpriced.
I mean America doesnt need the working middle class right? Let's blame the American worker for all of Big Business' inability to compete sucessfully.Comment
-
Ehh... Its not the job of your employer to make sure you have enough money to do what you want to. I make less than 65K, I own my own house, put money away every month, take a yearly vacation with my family, and see no problem putting my child through college when the time comes.Originally posted by latherIf you are not planning on owning your own house, sending your kids to college, or taking a yearly vacation then yes, thats overpriced.
I mean America doesnt need the working middle class right? Let's blame the American worker for all of Big Business' inability to compete sucessfully.
I make a decent living in relatively important job to the community (at least I think so
). Im in a Union, I am productive (like the vast majority of my counterparts), and I want to see my company be sucessful.
My union wages will someday allow my children to go to college and hopefully have more choices in what they want to do in the working world than I did. It gives my coworkers and their families more opportunities for a brighter future as well.
The fact of the matter is, why should someone have a 65K job when someone else is more than happy and qualified to do the same job for 40K. As it is our government protects the working class and unskilled labor (there being a difference) with minimum wage laws. Unions protect employees from the normal business practices (competetive bidding) that the company has to deal with.
What about the hundreds of thousands the unions pay there executives? What about the campaign contributions you may not agree with using your money? Isn't this really wasteful. Would you not be better represented by someone like you, a member of the union rather than a leader? I expect you understand the difference.
Inflate wages... it seems to be working so well for GM / Ford and the other companies that use assembly line production style. Of course, perhaps theres a reason when new plants are built in America they are built in right to work states."Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr SuessComment
-
I really dont think there is only one place to point blame for this mess.Originally posted by ShooterJMHey, if a person is worth $65k a year to a company, more power to them. I could care less if it's being a lawyer, surgeon, or trash collector. What I don't agree with is the fact that unions, generally speaking, keep wages articficially high. Even then, I really don't care. I just don't like to hear people compain about getting laid off when their union contributed to the fiscal problems. If the market price for a factory worker is $65k then what are they complaining about, just get another job at $65k.
However, unions in general (big unions, not your local Walmart or Shoprite union) have demands that are far out of the realm of reality. Look in NY at the Transit Union. I forget the specifics, but those crooks were fighting tooth and nail to keep their lucrative pension plan. While the rest of the world (the free market) have no where near the same quality of pension, job security, amount of overtime, salary, or medical benefits.
Think about this, say you owned a NYC subway station. It was yours, and you as a business owner were required to staff it. What do you think the market price for a token booth clerk is in the private sector? $10/hr tops with minimum bennies. Yet plastered all over the NY papers issome schmuck token booth clerk who makes $75k a year (+ bennies + full Pension) sleeping on the job.
Then the MTA cries every year how they need to raise fairs.
Seriously, how much should an assembly line worker make in the private sector? No offense to any hard working people, but come on. Should it really cost a company over $90k total-per-person compensation for basically someone to turn wrenches.
Then everyone complains when all of these companies ship operations to Mexico.Comment
-
Originally posted by Lohman446Ehh... Its not the job of your employer to make sure you have enough money to do what you want to. I make less than 65K, I own my own house, put money away every month, take a yearly vacation with my family, and see no problem putting my child through college when the time comes.
The fact of the matter is, why should someone have a 65K job when someone else is more than happy and qualified to do the same job for 40K. As it is our government protects the working class and unskilled labor (there being a difference) with minimum wage laws. Unions protect employees from the normal business practices (competetive bidding) that the company has to deal with.
What about the hundreds of thousands the unions pay there executives? What about the campaign contributions you may not agree with using your money? Isn't this really wasteful. Would you not be better represented by someone like you, a member of the union rather than a leader? I expect you understand the difference.
Inflate wages... it seems to be working so well for GM / Ford and the other companies that use assembly line production style. Of course, perhaps theres a reason when new plants are built in America they are built in right to work states.
Using "its okay if someone is willing to do your job for cheaper" argument sounds good until your job gets outsourced to India. Really I do hope that never happens to you personally but if it did, Im willing to believe that you'd change your perspective real quick.
Median price for a 1 family house here in Hawaii is about $489,000. I bet its a bit less than that where you live. If you can manage owning a modest house on less than 65k a year here --congratulations!, you must be single with no kids and subsisting on sunflower seeds and ice cubes.
Minimum wage? Have you heard of the term "working poor"? That term describes those that earn minimum wage. I hate the term "working poor", If someone who refuses welfare, and wants to contribute to society by being gainfully employed, shouldnt be "poor" period.
I hope you felt similiar outrage at companies like Enron and Worldcomm, for all but ruining the lives of 7000 of its workers all in the name of corporate greed, as you do for Ford AUW, but somehow I doubt it.Last edited by lather; 01-30-2006, 09:13 PM."They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
My FeedbackComment
-
I know what you mean...like the Big Farming industry! Those rich farmers getting apid not to grow crops....many of our Hollywood and media elitist are among them.Originally posted by hardr0ck68I would have fun arguing with you about the corruption in the timber industry. For example they are allowed (just as oil companys are) to claim any resource they pull out of their land as a "loss" because thet timber isnt there to be logged out in futhure years. I bet all companys wish they could claim a loss on every unit shipped.
Comment
-
how long you been a union steward. you got the speech down.Originally posted by latherUsing "its okay if someone is willing to do your job for cheaper" argument sounds good until your job gets outsourced to India. Really I do hope that never happens to you personally but if it did, Im willing to believe that you'd change your perspective real quick.
Median price for a 1 family house here in Hawaii is about $489,000. I bet its a bit less than that where you live. If you can manage owning a modest house on less than 65k a year here --congratulations!, you must be single with no kids and subsisting on sunflower seeds and ice cubes.
Minimum wage? Have you heard of the term "working poor"? That term describes those that earn minimum wage. I hate the term "working poor", If someone who refuses welfare, and wants to contribute to society by being gainfully employed, shouldnt be "poor" period.
I hope you felt similiar outrage at companies like Enron and Worldcomm, for all but ruining the lives of 7000 of its workers all in the name of corporate greed, as you do for Ford AUW, but somehow I doubt it.BEZERKERS
ALL MAG SHOOTING TEAMComment
-
Inevitable. And efficient.Originally posted by latherUsing "its okay if someone is willing to do your job for cheaper" argument sounds good until your job gets outsourced to India. Really I do hope that never happens to you personally but if it did, Im willing to believe that you'd change your perspective real quick.
Actually, its more.Median price for a 1 family house here in Hawaii is about $489,000. I bet its a bit less than that where you live. If you can manage owning a modest house on less than 65k a year here --congratulations!, you must be single with no kids and subsisting on sunflower seeds and ice cubes.
And, yes, single, no kids. rAmen occasionaly.
Who guarantees it? And, to the point, no auto union employee is close to minimum wage.Minimum wage? Have you heard of the term "working poor"? That term describes those that earn minimum wage. I hate the term "working poor", If someone who refuses welfare, and wants to contribute to society by being gainfully employed, shouldnt be "poor" period.
Actually, I think that those situations were ethically worse. And had far more widespread effects.I hope you felt similiar outrage at companies like Enron and Worldcomm, for all but ruining the lives of 7000 of its workers all in the name of corporate greed, as you do for Ford AUW, but somehow I doubt it.
/cheers, not trying to pick a fightGod....I guess I was probably returning videotapes.Comment
-
How long have you been a giant of industry? You got the sarcasm down.Originally posted by wimaghow long you been a union steward. you got the speech down."They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
My FeedbackComment
-
Nah its all goodOriginally posted by SCpoloRickerInevitable. And efficient.
Actually, its more.
And, yes, single, no kids. rAmen occasionaly.
Who guarantees it? And, to the point, no auto union employee is close to minimum wage.
Actually, I think that those situations were ethically worse. And had far more widespread effects.
/cheers, not trying to pick a fight
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
My FeedbackComment








Comment