can't understand ballers

[Chronobreak]

Out of respect for AO and the other members of this great site I will let my rage go. This is my home and I don't want to be a contributer to its dimise.

agreed, there is much i would like to say and get into as the thread goes off topic.

my fear is not making a mod or a dealer angry but getting tom fed up and having him push the red button on the forum putting ALL of this fun to rest

[BigEvil]

WOW. Who would have thought that sean would ever get the same kinda response when he posts that Rabbid does. Epic.


Hey Rabbid, PM incoming.

[jay8541]

Nah, you told people they didnt need them. Ethics anyone?

i said that because do you infact need the rail bushing to operate the gun no you do not that it hat isaid

And i aslo said that yes it should be used and that i amde a mistake how can i fix it


again you are not going to have the last word on this and ethics plays no part in my actions do to the fact i openly staed i made a mistake i was wrong, and that you should always use the bushing and that i did say which is a fact that you do not need the rail bushing to operate a mag you would know if you ever played a real game and not just on the computer

[CoolHand]

Nah, you told people they didnt need them. Ethics anyone?

You do realize that a Mag will function just fine without that rail bushing . . . . right?

It's just there to keep the frame and rail aligned should you decide to remove the valve in a field strip situation.

My loaner classic as of this moment does not have a rail bushing in it, and it functions just fine and dandy. It's a PITA to put together the first time you do it, but it's far from non-functional.

The bushing could be deleted entirely if one were to reduce the rear hole in the rail to 0.201" ID to match the front. Or, the rear screw could be replaced by a shoulder bolt of proper length and the hole in the rear of the frame enlarged to 0.250" ID.

There's always more than one way to skin a cat, it's just that some ways include more claws than others.

EDIT: I do find it kind of humorous how you're trying to turn a case of simple technical oversight into a matter of questionable ethics.

To err is human.

To try and portray such as evil is political.

To laugh mockingly (mostly) from the sidelines is divine.

[RogueFactor]

i said that because do you infact need the rail bushing to operate the gun no you do not that it hat isaid

And i aslo said that yes it should be used and that i amde a mistake how can i fix it


again you are not going to have the last word on this and ethics plays no part in my actions do to the fact i openly staed i made a mistake i was wrong, and that you should always use the bushing and that i did say which is a fact that you do not need the rail bushing to operate a mag you would know if you ever played a real game and not just on the computer

LOL, you are contradicting yourself Jay. You told people they didnt need them, but said they should be used?

Yep, thats totally ethical. . Stating that you are wrong after the fact doesnt negate the ethics of the situation. Sorry.

[BigEvil]

You do realize that a Mag will function just fine without that rail bushing . . . . right?

It's just there to keep the frame and rail aligned should you decide to remove the valve in a field strip situation.

My loaner classic as of this moment does not have a rail bushing in it, and it functions just fine and dandy. It's a PITA to put together the first time you do it, but it's far from non-functional.

The bushing could be deleted entirely if one were to reduce the rear hole in the rail to 0.201" ID to match the front. Or, the rear screw could be replaced by a shoulder bolt of proper length and the hole in the rear of the frame enlarged to 0.250" ID.

There's always more than one way to skin a cat, it's just that some ways include more claws than others.

D'oh - the facts... they sting.

[tech-chan]

I will not be back in this thread. Rogue=Immaturity. AO=Group of friends.
It's time to cast the clown out.

[Ninjeff]

My mag has been running fine without a rail bushing.

[RogueFactor]

You do realize that a Mag will function just fine without that rail bushing . . . . right?

You do know that a mag will function just fine without the trigger frame? It doesnt mean I will sell someone marker without one and tell them it isnt needed.

It's just there to keep the frame and rail aligned should you decide to remove the valve in a field strip situation.

It is there to keep it aligned...when the gun is firing too.

The bushing could be deleted entirely if one were to reduce the rear hole in the rail to 0.201" ID to match the front. Or, the rear screw could be replaced by a shoulder bolt of proper length and the hole in the rear of the frame enlarged to 0.250" ID.

Hold up. You mean you cant delete the bushing entirely without changing the specs? The bushing is needed? I think thats what Ive been saying all along.

[RogueFactor]

D'oh - the facts... they sting.

LOL...too bad they arent the facts.

[BigEvil]

LOL...too bad they arent the facts.

Two people in this thread had stated that their mags work without rail bushings. Are you calling them liars?

[RogueFactor]

Two people in this thread had stated that their mags work without rail bushings. Are you calling them liars?

AGD says you need it. Are you calling them liars?

Even a broken watch is right twice a day...

[BigEvil]

AGD says you need it. Are you calling them liars?

Even a broken watch is right twice a day...

No one in this thread questioned what AGD said. I questioned if you called them liars.

A broken watch may be right twice a day, but B.S. stinks 24/7

[nmib]

AGD says you need it. Are you calling them liars?

Yes. And Tom Kaye and his specs arnt god's law. My mag works fine with out a bushing also. Jesus, Shawn the oven is hot stop it.

[Coralis]

man did this thread turn out to be a pot stirrer , with epeens no less ...... sheesh