Originally posted by REDRT
Simple, really simple. I have never not acknowledged the E-mag as a great marker, but it does have its limitations. I'm sorry that I'm not bowing down as it being the greatest marker on earth and so MUCH better than everything else out there? You said it could be so MUCH BETTER than everything else. I'm sorry, how is it better?
I'm sorry that you were not able to go into your long winded rant without someone pointing out some of the things you stated as fact were simply not true. AO has never been about gathering around in a circle complimenting each other and telling each other how right we are despite being wrong. I'm sorry that I ask questions to understand others views rather than just stating my own and defending it to an extreme. Actually, no I'm not.
Even if you take that muscle car and add all the performance options to it, gain 500 horsepower, it doesn't compare to say the ZO6 Corvette which will match or exceed it in performance, get better fuel efficiency, and offer more amenities - very very poor example. Isn't even more interesting that GM has made the changes to compete with the best out there rather than just producing a '72 427 Six pack Corvette (which up through the C5 platform had a better quarter mile time than even the ZR1).
As to the rest of your attitude towards me. I'm arrogant enough to really not care what you think.
Funny, Hitech and I can have discussions wtihout ever making it a personal attack, or trolling for a response. Funny we both seem to be able to comprehend the rules.I think someones upset because they make blanket statements, are questioned on them, and can't get over themselves long enough to consider the possibility there are points of view that may differ from theres. Just my opinion...
That would be the day.
The Emag is a good gun. Spend the money building it, making it even better. It can be just as good as any other marker. Maybe even better in some ways? I know in your opinion it could never be an equal to whatever it is you use on a daily bases. Fine, be a downer. You've probably done it first and done it better than anyone here. Your some kind of PB god! Who appointed you the say all, end all guy?
Sorry for blowing up on you, but sometime I get annoyed with peoples notions of the emag not being able to be MUCH better. It is like taking a muscle car and restomoding it with modern day equipment. A balance of old and new making it perform with the best of them. For the extreme overhaul it takes money no doubt, but it is possable. Not that isn't still a viable marker in the speedball arena.
. They were not impressive in comparison The point is, even though the 72 was as good as it was, they made changes, bit by bit, got better in other areas, now the 72 is obsolete. Even before the surpassed 1.4 mile times they had improved efficiency, handling, comforts, etc. Vettes are not always the best, it was an easy example I had off the top of my mind. Wht exactly is "stock built"? As it came from the factory? Or built? Is that stock, or built?




Comment