Paintball and Economic Terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RRfireblade

    • Jun 2002
    • 5103

    #136
    Originally posted by luke
    Was that an implication? Because TK owns the patent on that one.

    Not precisely IIRC , his is tad different.

    The AT-85 for example.

    Think theres a site for ATS . . .






    Logic Paintball Forums
    My A O Feedback Here
    Other Feedback Here
    If I've Been Any help
    Please Leave Some. :)

    Comment

    • cyrus-the-virus
      http://www.thepbforum.com/
      • Feb 2006
      • 1259

      #137
      We should take all the companies and combine them into one super duper company, that controls the world of paintball, and can't sue eachother for idea's so every one benifets

      To bad that will never work in the real world.

      Comment

      • hitech
        Not a shedder of vortices
        • Nov 2001
        • 4775

        #138
        Originally posted by Lohman446
        The Q-loader does not truly either. Think along the lines of a revolver cylinder where the feed system cycling is part of the firing mechanics of the weapon


        Although I was thinking more along the lines of a continous loop belt.

        And Tom does not have a patent on what I'm thinking.

        The QLoader isn't bad, but being spring fed has many limitations.


        Hey Hitech your starting to sound like me! - AGD
        Hitech is the man.... :eek: - Blennidae
        The only Hitech Lubricant

        Comment

        • Lohman446
          Useful posts: 7
          • Jun 2003
          • 9315

          #139
          Originally posted by hitech


          Although I was thinking more along the lines of a continous loop belt.

          And Tom does not have a patent on what I'm thinking.

          The QLoader isn't bad, but being spring fed has many limitations.
          Agreed, I was just using the revolver as a simpler to understand example of the feed and firing mechanism being intertwined
          "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

          Comment

          • Raven001
            Registered User
            • Apr 2004
            • 314

            #140
            Why not load paintballs in a shell much like a bullet and use the gas produced by a primer or like to propel it. This has been done in the past and is done now. The only drawback for paintball applications is that velocity is currently hard to control but that might not be so hard to a way to control.

            Comment

            • snoopay700
              Serious About Men

              • Jan 2006
              • 3071

              #141
              Originally posted by hitech


              Although I was thinking more along the lines of a continous loop belt.

              And Tom does not have a patent on what I'm thinking.

              The QLoader isn't bad, but being spring fed has many limitations.
              Well i suggested that because it feeds at like over 50 (supposedly, i know it can feed around 35 with no misfeeds) so there's no worry of chopping at all.
              Il n'y a point de sots si incommodes que ceux qui ont de l'esprit.

              Comment

              • Lohman446
                Useful posts: 7
                • Jun 2003
                • 9315

                #142
                Originally posted by Raven001
                Why not load paintballs in a shell much like a bullet and use the gas produced by a primer or like to propel it. This has been done in the past and is done now. The only drawback for paintball applications is that velocity is currently hard to control but that might not be so hard to a way to control.
                Because you would be subject to firearm statutes.
                "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

                Comment

                Working...