Introducing the Micromag 2009

[Hgblues]

That's really not necessary , Zoom. We can all scratch, 001, in 'em ourself !

woot! ding page 59!!

[Drix]

So umm, whats the possibility that in the future PTP might release a L and R breech for these that would flow with the marker?


Btw: HUrray Prototype!

[GRimm]

For swapping between warp and vertical modes. Which, honestly I don't see myself doing often, but may do time to time.

Dont forget you would also have to clean the body after everytime you play (unless you are one of those people who dont take care of their markers) so that means complete break down of the body and then reassembled after that.

[vf-xx]

Dont forget you would also have to clean the body after everytime you play (unless you are one of those people who dont take care of their markers) so that means complete break down of the body and then reassembled after that.

While true, that does depend on the day of play. I see no point in breaking down that part of the gun unless I take gun hits.

[going_home]

Crunch Berries !

I have not been told to serialize anything

You realize its only going to make this take longer if you make Russel be a cerealizer ?

[Drix]

You realize its only going to make this take longer if you make Russel be a cerealizer ?

Just keep the list published and get your user name engraved into the bottom when it's finished.

[Tracy_ptp]

We are getting closer!!! I know I have a bunch of paperwork and emails to deal with. And I haven't had a chance to just sit and do it. I will at least try and deal with emails this afternoon, but the paperwork will have to wait until next week. We (the family) are moving into a new house over the next 4 days. So with all the packing we have been doing, it will be time to move and unpack everything. It's been difficult to keep up. We will not have internet in the new house until Tuesday, so you will not be seeing any posts from me from Friday through Tuesday.

[pepper]

Hey Zoom
Everything is looking good, I cant wait to see it all together.
I have some questions about three different spots on the marker body. Spot # 1 and 2 were flush with the rotating breach face in the concept, 1 is now under the breach and 2 is under the front end. Spot #3 width looks smaller than the angled cut width on the breach.

I know your in a "proofing" stage, I'm trying my hardest not to poke the bear, just cirrus.

[ZoomZ@PTP]

#1 and #2 are illusions from the camera and 3 is just an adjustment in the programming .

I tweeked that front block last night untill 11:30 and im fixing to turn it over to the guys for production after lunch today .

Im still trying to get the prototype into the hands of RRF for testing .

We have both been busy and havnt seemed to hook up yet for one reason of another

[pepper]

ya #2 looks like it has a reflection or something on it, thanks for the fast reply man. I cant wait!

[pepper]

So many after market parts are offered in gloss black, will there be an option for gloss black? if not would PTP be willing to do a gloss black option with an added charge?

[vf-xx]

So many after market parts are offered in gloss black, will there be an option for gloss black? if not would PTP be willing to do a gloss black option with an added charge?

Original color options: Raw, Gloss black, Dust black, Gloss Gunmetal.

[p8ntbal4me]

Zoom;

I dont want to go through ALL the posts,.... so here is the question I see needing an answer from the pics:

Ball Detents,.... I thought there were going to be 2 of them? As of now,.. I see none for the Proto type your trying to get to RRF.

~ P8nt

[Watcher]

It is probably too far along in the design phases, but I had a thought pertaining to my original comment on the edges of the breach sticking out odd.

If the entire top section of the front block, breach, and the area in front of the sight rail were lowered wouldn't it allow the breach to look more flush when rotated?

The corners would still stick out, but it seems as if the sides of the breach would match the height of the body and front block, and the top (feedneck side) of the breach would be flush against the sides of the body when rotated in the warp position.


It would make it look 100 times better, and it shouldn't upset the lines at all aside from making the beveled edges a bit narrower.

Unless, of course, it takes away too much material for the feedneck threads.


Actually, in that case couldn't you bevel the front and back sides of the breach down to meet the body, like was done on the sides? It would still stick out sideways and it would stand higher than the body in the vert position, but I think it would flow better in the vert and warp positions instead of just the vert position.

Does that make sense to anyone besides me?

[Madmarx]

Zoom;

I dont want to go through ALL the posts,.... so here is the question I see needing an answer from the pics:

Ball Detents,.... I thought there were going to be 2 of them? As of now,.. I see none for the Proto type your trying to get to RRF.

~ P8nt

Don't you have some diapers to change???