-
-
Ok?
See, this is exactly why I do this. You come from an echo chamber where you have the narrative cultivated and partitioned out to you. Half of what you write/say/repeat, makes absolutely no sense. The other half can be easily explained. I am not here to change your way of thi king or change your views. That is like asking water not to be wet. But what I do do here is to correct what bullhokey you post up, explain to you where you are wrong and not allow this once great forum to become a partisan site and totally scare off everyone left.Comment
-
Your points are laughable.
Did you forget how Maxine Waters urged everyone to the attack Trump Cabinet anywhere and everywhere?
What about Rand Paul being attacked?
What about Steve Scalise at a congressional baseball game?
I could go on but why bother you will come up with a bull$hit spin. Trump may have said things but YOUR people actually perform violent acts....often.
I won't argue with you because you are incapable of admitting you're wrong. Sometimes I am compelled to because your BULL$HIT meter is off the charts!
Your attempts to justify the ASSASSINATION attempts on Trump just shows EVERYONE how F%$KED up in the head you really are.
Truly pathetic.
......You know you want one!!Comment
-
Have you noticed that each time Trump wins a debate, somebody shoots at him or tries to?CT Co-ordinator, Paintball MarshalsComment
-
Even foxnews said he lost the debate. But if you grade on a curve and count the blatant traps that allowed trump to go on his rants, then sure. It was a win :rofl
Pics or shens, as PBNation would say.
Now I will say again, I do not support or condone violence in any form. I have merely provided numerous direct quotes of the republican presidential candidate, advocating for violence. If you do not want violence then you speak against it. If you accept that violence then you will face the consequences of your words with actions.
If he said things, then it is true? In a battle of words, words are the only thing you have. So if those words were OK to promote violence, i.e. accepting violence for your benefit, then it is not absurd to expect that some people would use violence against you.
Also, the majority of those quotes were from one article provided by Google. So no, those are not my words, nor my spin. Those are facts. Trump said it, and now he is being held accountable for what he said. If you don't like it, guess you need to find a better party leader, huh?
I will absolutely admit when I am wrong. It's just that you haven't proven anything I say is wrong. Care to do one last AR=assualt rifle tangent?
Again no. I do not support the assassination attempt of anyone. Far from it. Being a liberal, I only want to hug trees, not kill them. I wouldn't know the danger end of a gun from a hole in the ground.
So don't put words in my mouth about me wanting a murder. No, that is what you think, that is what you believe. Cause you can't comprehend that anyone could or would think differently from you, if not they deserve a good shot in the head to make them understand. And until you prove me wrong(see what I did there?), I don't see you as having any value in what you say/write at all.
This is what I want. I want Trump to go away. Live the best life he could out of the public eye. I want all you Trump believers to see how truly corrupt and vile this man is. To see this wizard of Oz as the frail, hateful, dishonorable, looser that the world see him. You have be taken by the world's best conman. I want you to open your eyes.
In fact, I will just block you entirely. With as much time as I have wasted in this thread, you are doubly a waste of time.Comment
-
I understand there will be disappointment on one side or the other.
Your confidence in your choice of road, while commendable, may be sadly misplaced.
We'll know after the votes have been tallied, argued over, re-counted, argued again in court with accusations both real and false from & against each side ~ The usual drill.
Any "Bad End" is not for me, it's for this Country.CT Co-ordinator, Paintball MarshalsComment
-
And I say that, though one side wins and one side looses, it is the goal of one side to either stack the deck so they don't loose, regardless of if their policies and how they wish to govern or they just don't believe that the popularity given in th3 votes is not the same as what's in his head.
And only one other time has the courts been needed to differentiate in an election. Every other time, one side deemed they had no way to win and graciously conceded the effort. Never has that concession been taken back. Yet we sit here and see this cavalcade of litigation with the promise of more to come. That is and should not be the norm. You loose, you say it wasn't time and you go look back and find a way to fix your campaign. History tells us that it can work, as Grover Cleveland lost and then won, serving 2 terms, non consecutively.
So, in one way, the constant litigation is just a show of being a sore looser and not in touch with reality. What does that say about the party of litigation?Comment
-
To back that up;
CT Co-ordinator, Paintball MarshalsComment
-
This is funny. The first Cabinet meeting in 11 months at the White House presided over by J. Biden.
Jill Biden, not Joe.
CT Co-ordinator, Paintball MarshalsComment
-
I have questions about the second paragraph.
How does "in-person absentee voting" work? How much security does it need? Why are Portage County Democrats posting it on facebook?In a statement on the Portage County Democrats' Facebook page, county board of elections chair Randi Clites said members voted 3-1 Friday to remove the sheriff's department from providing security during in-person absentee voting.CT Co-ordinator, Paintball MarshalsComment
-
I do believe the term "in-person absentee voting" as represented in the article is a misnomer. Either they ment to say that the voting is anonymous or since it is talking about this now, that people can drop off their legal ballots. I will give you that it is not clear, but that is not the problem. The county sheriff acting in a very partisan and intimidating manner is much more the problem. While it is the job of the election board to determine if a vote is legal, it should have no persons or entities there acting in a partisan way. A officer of the law is there to enforce the laws, not to act as a judge. That is the main focus of the article. Unless called for, voting is up to the individual and is anonymous.
As for security, as much as they, the people of the election board feel is needed. And for posting it on facebook, this is called transparency. Acting in full view or allowing people to view the actions. If you were to do this behind closed doors and in secret, more questions of the election board would be raised, as well as making it known what the sheriff was doing. So basically, the board was calling out what the sheriff was doing, making it clear that actions are being taken to remedy the problem.
Not that difficult to understand.Comment
Comment