Bush Campaign Ad w/ Iraqi Soccer team

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Konigballer
    "Dusty Bottoms" on MCB

    • Jun 2003
    • 1254

    #76
    Roosters in full on Darth Vader mode SWEET!! Die Liberal Scum!!


    Roadawg, France did'nt just refuse to join us because of their "moral purity". France had alot of money invested in Saddam's Iraq, Chirac had negotiated for a 23% stake in Iraq's oil export.

    Chirac also aproved the construction of Iraq's first nuclear reactor, until the Israeli's bombed it to the ground in 1981 before it was ever completed.

    $20 billion worth of weapon contracts were bought from France by Iraq.

    France became Iraq's No.2 trading partner, are goodwill friends the Russians were No.1.

    We obviously put this highly lucrative buisness relationship to the torch when we invaded. France was very pissed at this, the fact it was America that messed it up for them did'nt help, and chose to go "the moral highground" on the Iraq war even though they've been nipping at our heals for a piece of the post-war Iraq economic pie, as long as their guys don't have to do the dying of course.

    Its all buisness baby, our side AND theirs. Don't forget that

    Comment

    • lather
      Registered User
      • Jul 2004
      • 591

      #77
      Originally posted by CaptaiN_JacK
      President Bush is the ONLY person in the US that has the mental capacity to handle terrorism. Absolutely nobody or group would have handled terrorism as efficiently as Bush did. Notice how many times we have been attacked since he got into office? Oh wait, it's gotten worse....

      Once more just so you people can get it through your heads.

      <font size="20pt">Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.</font>

      If you had replaced Bush with Cheney, I wouldnt have thought this post is so hilarious!!

      Common Dreams has been providing breaking news & views for the progressive community since 1997. We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported. Our Mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.



      Mental Capacity to fight terroism? The man doesnt/cant read a newspaper.


      Yah its true that we havent been attacked, but 1000 Americans killed and 5000-6000 wounded since 09/11. Maybe you dont know or realize that our boys are still fighting and dieing in Iraq...

      Yes we know 09/11 has nothing to do with Iraq, Someone let our President in on this please!!
      Oh wait he knows now, its not 09/11 its WMDS!!!....errr no WMD's....ummm lets give the Iraqi people thier freedom!! .....Yeah thats it ummm freedom for all Iraqis....Special offer!! if you got oil, call right now and get 50% more Freedom!!
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin

      My Feedback

      Comment

      • lather
        Registered User
        • Jul 2004
        • 591

        #78
        Originally posted by Tunaman
        "I want the violence and the war to go away from the city," says Sadir, 21. "We don't wish for the presence of Americans in our country. We want them to go away."

        Well the feeling is quite mutual good fella. I really don't like terrorists in my country either.

        Please clarify this, Are you equating our American soldiers in Iraq to terroists??? I dont think you are but perhaps you should reword it better to avoid confusion and some heavy flamage.
        "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin

        My Feedback

        Comment

        • FactsOfLife
          Conservative Jihadi
          • May 2002
          • 2504

          #79
          Effing libs, don't even make me come out of retirement to straighten you pathetic jackasses out.

          'I guess John Kerry went into the primaries without a plan to win the election.' - Ann Coulter
          All you ever needed to know about how the left thinks in one video.
          The Thinking Conservatives Website
          Hey Michael Mooron, THIS is what a documentary looks like.

          Comment

          • lather
            Registered User
            • Jul 2004
            • 591

            #80
            Originally posted by FactsOfLife
            Effing libs, don't even make me come out of retirement to straighten you pathetic jackasses out.

            Ahh resorting to cursing at someone. Much easier to swear and call people names than debate facts and opinions in a mature manner.

            Not that it matters to you but I voted for Reagan in 84, Bush in 88 and again in 92. Clinton in 96.

            I own and shoot a Glock 31 and Bushmaster (the .223 not the .68) and im an active member of the NRA. I guess if supporting a candidate that doesnt propagate a culture of fear and ignorance while kowtowing to big business interests makes me an "effing liberal" so be it. As ex-military it does matter to me to pick a candidate that ACTUALLY served.

            Its all about fear for you far right wingers isnt it? You take advantage of people's anxieties and fears and when someone starts to question your agenda, you resort to name calling and shrill cries of "You have no patriotism!" If we can call each other names I guess "fright winger" sounds as good as any to describe yall.
            Yes its a dangerous world out there, but do try to go outside of your enclave once in a while, sunsets and blue skies are a beautiful thing to see. Try it!!! you may find it worthwhile.
            Last edited by lather; 08-20-2004, 11:04 PM.
            "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin

            My Feedback

            Comment

            • Tunaman
              Specialized AGD Tech

              • Dec 2000
              • 8643

              #81
              Originally posted by lather
              Please clarify this, Are you equating our American soldiers in Iraq to terroists??? I dont think you are but perhaps you should reword it better to avoid confusion and some heavy flamage.
              No. I am referring to Iraqi's, Saudi's, and the like terrorist groups here in the US. I was inferring that Iraq has plenty of its own terrorists that this man is blaming the US for. He should try and straighten out his own people first before crying about the people that are trying to help his country. Damn hypocrite!
              Email me for low prices on ALL AGD Products and more. [email protected]
              Tunamart

              Comment

              • Rooster
                Registered User
                • Oct 2000
                • 1069

                #82
                "Yah its true that we havent been attacked, but 1000 Americans killed and 5000-6000 wounded since 09/11. Maybe you dont know or realize that our boys are still fighting and dieing in Iraq...

                Yes we know 09/11 has nothing to do with Iraq, Someone let our President in on this please!!
                Oh wait he knows now, its not 09/11 its WMDS!!!....errr no WMD's....ummm lets give the Iraqi people thier freedom!! .....Yeah thats it ummm freedom for all Iraqis....Special offer!! if you got oil, call right now and get 50% more Freedom!! "

                In no place in this rambling jumble of incoherent thoughts did you say anything remotely meaningful.

                The war happened becuase of Sadam's violation of his surrender terms to the US and to the UN. That is why we went to Iraq and not to Korea or Iran. Iraq lost a war to us. They made us promises. They renigged. Now Sadam is in a little cell. That is the price of breaking the terms of a surrender. While 1000 lives lost is hardly paltry, its far better than could ever have been hoped for when occupying and heavily hostile country.

                Of course the liberal option was to leave Sadam in peace. He could tourture the Iraqi soccer team, kill women and children, and the little liberals could sleep happy at night knowing that no one was killed by an American bomb that day. How can you even consider yourselves human?

                Comment

                • Jeffy-CanCon
                  veteran rec player
                  • May 2003
                  • 1309

                  #83
                  Originally posted by lather
                  ...

                  Mental Capacity to fight terroism? The man doesnt/cant read a newspaper.
                  ...

                  "The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers."
                  - Thomas Jefferson

                  Originally posted by Rooster
                  ...
                  The war happened becuase of Sadam's violation of his surrender terms to the US and to the UN. That is why we went to Iraq and not to Korea or Iran. Iraq lost a war to us. They made us promises. They renigged. Now Sadam is in a little cell. That is the price of breaking the terms of a surrender. While 1000 lives lost is hardly paltry, its far better than could ever have been hoped for when occupying and heavily hostile country.

                  Of course the liberal option was to leave Sadam in peace. He could tourture the Iraqi soccer team, kill women and children, and the little liberals could sleep happy at night knowing that no one was killed by an American bomb that day. How can you even consider yourselves human?
                  In between the crazy rants, Rooster sometimes speaks the truth. Like now. Iraq is and will be better off without Saddam Hussein. It isn't a painless or instantaneous transition, but it was a net good. Like surgery to repair an injury.

                  Maybe the public was mislead about why it was necessary to overthrow Saddam. WMDs & terrorism just sold better in the press. If you look closely at the history of the Western democracies, you'll find that the public reasons for going to war are almost never the same reasons debated in cabinet.

                  E.g.:
                  Great Britain's entry into WW1 was proclaimed to the public as a matter of principle: her treaties with France and Belgium. the importance of honouring the treaties was not discussed in the decision to go to war. The question they considered was whether or not in a future conflict they could afford to have German u-boats operating from bases on the Belgian coast. (this info from the autobiography of the then-Chancellor of the Exchequer, David Lloyd George).

                  Jeff P
                  Secretary
                  The Canadian Contingent Paintball Club
                  Cousins - EMR - PaintStorm - Odyssey - StraightShot

                  Comment

                  • FactsOfLife
                    Conservative Jihadi
                    • May 2002
                    • 2504

                    #84
                    Lather, don't make the mistake of assuming that because my post was immediately after yours that it was directed at you.

                    If I had an issue with something you said, I would have quoted you.

                    And yeah, most libs are effing jackasses.

                    Now if you'll all excuse me, I have a National Convention to get ready to go to.

                    Look for me on FOX kiddies...

                    'I guess John Kerry went into the primaries without a plan to win the election.' - Ann Coulter
                    All you ever needed to know about how the left thinks in one video.
                    The Thinking Conservatives Website
                    Hey Michael Mooron, THIS is what a documentary looks like.

                    Comment

                    • NJPaint
                      Pro Peace
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2478

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Rooster
                      "Yah its true that we havent been attacked, but 1000 Americans killed and 5000-6000 wounded since 09/11. Maybe you dont know or realize that our boys are still fighting and dieing in Iraq...

                      Yes we know 09/11 has nothing to do with Iraq, Someone let our President in on this please!!
                      Oh wait he knows now, its not 09/11 its WMDS!!!....errr no WMD's....ummm lets give the Iraqi people thier freedom!! .....Yeah thats it ummm freedom for all Iraqis....Special offer!! if you got oil, call right now and get 50% more Freedom!! "

                      In no place in this rambling jumble of incoherent thoughts did you say anything remotely meaningful.

                      The war happened becuase of Sadam's violation of his surrender terms to the US and to the UN. That is why we went to Iraq and not to Korea or Iran. Iraq lost a war to us. They made us promises. They renigged. Now Sadam is in a little cell. That is the price of breaking the terms of a surrender. While 1000 lives lost is hardly paltry, its far better than could ever have been hoped for when occupying and heavily hostile country.

                      Of course the liberal option was to leave Sadam in peace. He could tourture the Iraqi soccer team, kill women and children, and the little liberals could sleep happy at night knowing that no one was killed by an American bomb that day. How can you even consider yourselves human?
                      What exactly did he violate... Where are the WMD?
                      Rooster "But such is the mentallity of the Arab people. Which is why as long as there are Arabs, there will be a terrorist problem."
                      ^^^ known AO racists


                      Contact Info
                      AIM: holsamoht
                      e-mail: [email protected]
                      My Feedback

                      Comment

                      • Rooster
                        Registered User
                        • Oct 2000
                        • 1069

                        #86
                        "What exactly did he violate"

                        He kicked the inspectors out. That was part of his surrender. When 200,000 enemy soldiers are on your back door, its a little too late to say, "oh, let them back in."

                        Comment

                        • NJPaint
                          Pro Peace
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2478

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Rooster
                          "What exactly did he violate"

                          He kicked the inspectors out. That was part of his surrender. When 200,000 enemy soldiers are on your back door, its a little too late to say, "oh, let them back in."
                          Okay, that makes sense. He did violate internation law. 12 of them.

                          Now its Israel's turn. 66 resolutions violated. 3 binding security council resolutions violated. ??? Why aren't we enforcing THOSE international laws since its soooo important to show people what happens when you violate UN rules!
                          Rooster "But such is the mentallity of the Arab people. Which is why as long as there are Arabs, there will be a terrorist problem."
                          ^^^ known AO racists


                          Contact Info
                          AIM: holsamoht
                          e-mail: [email protected]
                          My Feedback

                          Comment

                          • cphilip
                            Former Moderator

                            • Jun 2026
                            • 16216

                            #88
                            Oh brother......

                            here we go...

                            Oh wait...theres a little check box down here that says "close thread after posting".... wonder what that does.... lets find out!


                            AGD, where we are so good we can do it with only ONE tube!

                            cphilip.com

                            Comment

                            Working...