AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
Now that I've got everything tuned up (KC trouble free and centerflag hyperflow at about 950 psi) I'm extremely happy with the ULT. Played last night and it absolutely rips, no breaks or double feeds, no bolt sticking. Might have to take out a shim, because there was a VERY nice sweet spot!
Trex
ULEX/ULT MAG
omega rail/i-frame
freak barrel system
centerflag 68/45 hyperflow
Smoked Evy II
For everyone who has a regular valve (like classic, or A.I.R.) how is the ULE working? I am one of the few who are trying this mod on a standard valve and I need some more responses becuase mine is coming hopefully by friday, and Im playing on Sunday. I want to get everything straight so when I get there I know what to expect and what to do.
So far it seems like the people who have the mod on a classic valve (2 people as far as Im aware) got it to work with a lot of shims...is this right? I know there will be a problem with the recharge rate but the way I see it, if we just throw in the most amount of shims it should shorten the pin enough that it wont matter that much. Of course Im not looking to get 15 bps with this, just a lighter pull that enables me to shoot a burst of like 15 @ a rate of 13 bps... In fact I only shoot as fast as I possibly can once in awhile. Will this style fit the ULT for a A.I.R. valve?
MM19223 -=Minimag=-
[Level-10]&[ULT]
-Self Polished Body
-Intelliframe nickel
-Lapco SS 12 inch
-KAPP Chrome gas thru-grip
-32* Flame Drop Chrome
-Black Macro
-47ci 3000psi Crossfire tank My minimag-link working
This is the forum for trouble shooting your Airgun Designs products, including the Automag, RT, E-Mag, and WarpFeed. Also a great place to ask technical questions about non AGD products. An Airsmith's homeroom!
-Calvin
From a poster at PB Nation:
""Jim, back to your cave. Bob Long is on the batphone..."
Tom has posted that the ult Will go into a classic valve and Will do what it's made to (lighten the trigger pull). HOWEVER, due to the valve's lack of reactivity, it WILL shortstroke. Alot of shims will help with this, but not eliminate it.
Got it, I got my ULT yesterday and Im gonna try it out this weekend and I'll let those of you who have a Classic Valve know how it works when I get back. Right now I have 2 LVL X shims in and 4 ULT shims... I still have 1 ULT left and 1 LVL X left, but I might need that last LVL X shim.
MM19223 -=Minimag=-
[Level-10]&[ULT]
-Self Polished Body
-Intelliframe nickel
-Lapco SS 12 inch
-KAPP Chrome gas thru-grip
-32* Flame Drop Chrome
-Black Macro
-47ci 3000psi Crossfire tank My minimag-link working
Well, I've put this thing in a micromag with an xvalve, , level10, intelligrip, and warp. Last weekend, I started converting my team to the wisdom of AGD. I haven't even upped the pressure yet to increase reactivity and I am stunned. There is a spot on the trigger that just causes this thing to rip. Spent alot of time tuning it, but it was sooo worth it. Really consistant too. Definantly want to just drop the money on the KC trouble free lube though.
This thing is going to be my main tourney gun for the forseeable future. Awesome THank you Tom.
"[T]he evidence also strongly suggests that neither Billy nor Adam could have invented what is claimed."
-United States District Court judge G.M. King,
on Smart Parts' patent claim, August 23rd, 2004, page 16.
im gettin a hyperframe for my classic and i was wonderin if the ult would really work since the reactivity would not be needed with the hyperframe. ive not gotten an honest answer yet. also i think it would cut down on battery use.
DAMN THE MAN! SAVE THE EMPIRE!!!
--------(S.P.)---------(AGD)
classic "steel monstrosity"
GWAR Slave #1501
(UN)Official AO Prankster
Have you considered getting an x-valve instead of a hyper frame? You can trade in your classic valve and pay $225 and get the xvalve. It comes with a XL I personally think that upgrading from classic valve to x-valve is a better upgrade than going to a hyper frame. imho.
"[T]he evidence also strongly suggests that neither Billy nor Adam could have invented what is claimed."
-United States District Court judge G.M. King,
on Smart Parts' patent claim, August 23rd, 2004, page 16.
imho? actually, its not an opinion but a fact,,hahaha.. but seriously, you would get a Level 10 (absolutely necessary in all cases, its just too awesome to pass up, no joke) and a valve that would really enable you to fire just as fast as a HyperFrame...also...those frames fall apart eventually, and usually dont work that well..
I know electronics are the cutting edge of paintball technology right now, but you have to understand that we havent found a way to make them reliable yet...people only pretend that they are reliable...I see at least one electronic related problem each time I play, and Ive had my problems with my ricochet too. However, mechnical parts are almost invincible if you take care of them right, which basically just includes oiliing the right parts and keeping it clean.
Trust me, the Xvalve is not only worth more than a HyperFrame but it will definately give you much better results.
MM19223 -=Minimag=-
[Level-10]&[ULT]
-Self Polished Body
-Intelliframe nickel
-Lapco SS 12 inch
-KAPP Chrome gas thru-grip
-32* Flame Drop Chrome
-Black Macro
-47ci 3000psi Crossfire tank My minimag-link working
Not really, The whole purpose of the ule is to lighten the trigger pull. Since with a hyper frame, your finger will no longer have a mechanical link to the on/off, it probably won't help at all. I would save up and shop for a retro, or x valve. Something that can recharge quicker so that you don't end up with any shoot down.
"[T]he evidence also strongly suggests that neither Billy nor Adam could have invented what is claimed."
-United States District Court judge G.M. King,
on Smart Parts' patent claim, August 23rd, 2004, page 16.
Comment