Let's recap so that Maggot and Squid can perhaps defend their position as it was originally stated:
1 - A hit might be cleared by a ref and you might still be in the game.
2 - A ref has no obligation to pull your arm band. It is the player's responsibility.
3 - Even if the ref pulls your armband ASAP, that's precious seconds you were playing on. As until the PLAYER pulls their armband or signals themselves out (AS REQUIRED BY THE RULES) or the ref pulls the player, noone in their right mind should take their attention off the player in case they are still active.
So, following Squid's way of playing is completely agains NPPL rules on numerous counts.
Then we can follow up with the really telling part. Intent.
The important bit is bolded. That can easily and rightly be construed as clear and undeniable intent to cheat and play-on.
If I come out from behind a bunker and see Squid moving on field and clearly not indicating he's eliminated, I waste my time and give Squid's team an advantage if I take the time to snap shoot him. His band might be off, but it might be on the arm furthest from me and out of sight. How exactly is it my fault that my team loses out because of Squid's failure to follow clear rules (alternately because he CLEARLY wants to gain an advantage by the cheat, or because holding his hand or gun up is gooberish) and the ref's failure to enforce them?
If Squid's failure to follow the rules causes me to shoot him and allow his teammate to move up, that's no "small thing".
Originally posted by -=Squid=-
2 - A ref has no obligation to pull your arm band. It is the player's responsibility.
3 - Even if the ref pulls your armband ASAP, that's precious seconds you were playing on. As until the PLAYER pulls their armband or signals themselves out (AS REQUIRED BY THE RULES) or the ref pulls the player, noone in their right mind should take their attention off the player in case they are still active.
So, following Squid's way of playing is completely agains NPPL rules on numerous counts.
Then we can follow up with the really telling part. Intent.
Originally posted by -=Squid=-
If I come out from behind a bunker and see Squid moving on field and clearly not indicating he's eliminated, I waste my time and give Squid's team an advantage if I take the time to snap shoot him. His band might be off, but it might be on the arm furthest from me and out of sight. How exactly is it my fault that my team loses out because of Squid's failure to follow clear rules (alternately because he CLEARLY wants to gain an advantage by the cheat, or because holding his hand or gun up is gooberish) and the ref's failure to enforce them?
If Squid's failure to follow the rules causes me to shoot him and allow his teammate to move up, that's no "small thing".

Comment