Moving parts in rubbing contact require lubrication to avoid excessive wear. Honorifics and formal politeness provide lubrication where people rub together.
Often the very young, the untraveled, the naive, the unsophisticated deplore these formalities as "empty," "meaningless," or "dishonest," and scorn to use them.
No matter how "pure" their motives, they thereby throw sand into machinery that does not work too well at best.
Often the very young, the untraveled, the naive, the unsophisticated deplore these formalities as "empty," "meaningless," or "dishonest," and scorn to use them.
No matter how "pure" their motives, they thereby throw sand into machinery that does not work too well at best.
I grew up with a nursery rhyme ~ "Sticks & stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me".
Doesn't seem to be the case any longer. Apparently, words are sufficient to warrant sticks & stones, even bullets.
You would think looney Loomer would realize that. Transgenders are terrorists? I could address that, just not now.
Back to the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Two points. First, the only questions are ~ Did this man pull a trigger and end another man's life? If found guilty, what should be the punishment?
Nothing else matters. No number of ideologies or feelings can possibly justify such an act.
Second, how did it get this way? Why are so many so offended by perceived insults that they have to respond with violence?
I agree, but have to ask, why do we see so much violence? Are there truly so many incompetent people out there that we have to see it on a daily basis?
Perhaps it is influenced by hateful rhetoric. But it can't be ascribed to only one side.
This guy has a very one-sided collection. (Though I can't say much for his commentary).
These videos are common. Always Democrats and liberals. Why?
Where are these collections of Republicans acting like that? Even when they say stupid things?


Comment