What KIND of a COUNTRY do we live in......

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1stdeadeye
    Still around????
    • Jun 2002
    • 8501

    #61
    Originally posted by impostal22


    kinda like blacks and women appeared to not have equal rights. good thing we cleared that up, huh?


    And that was changed by law!!!!

    How many countries allow gay marriage?

    and to make an interesting point, the 19th amendment says that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." what "sex" is is not defined. look it up in a dictionary and you'll find that one of the definitions is "The sexual urge or instinct as it manifests itself in behavior." so i guess one could interpret the 19th amendment as considering all rights of homosexuals equal to rights of heterosexuals.


    Sex is the sex of the individual, not Sexual preference and you now that so quit with the semantics!

    Comment

    • dansim
      ive been busy
      • Jun 2001
      • 4479

      #62
      rethinking about this over lunch, ive come to a conclusion that the people who associate gay marrige with being similar to necrophelia,bestiality and other sick fetishes are indeed twisted individuals who should seek some serious mental health

      Comment

      • dansim
        ive been busy
        • Jun 2001
        • 4479

        #63
        Originally posted by 1stdeadeye
        Originally posted by impostal22


        and to make an interesting point, the 19th amendment says that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." what "sex" is is not defined. look it up in a dictionary and you'll find that one of the definitions is "The sexual urge or instinct as it manifests itself in behavior." so i guess one could interpret the 19th amendment as considering all rights of homosexuals equal to rights of heterosexuals.


        Sex is the sex of the individual, not Sexual preference and you now that so quit with the semantics! [/B]
        hes right as we have the judicial system to interpet(sp) laws/amendments/the constitution, and the way they have interpeted it, its the sex of the person if they interpeted it your way impostal then there would be no problems

        Comment

        • Crime Dog
          Ambassador to Newbies
          • Oct 2003
          • 219

          #64
          I'm curious...what does "religion" have to do with it? To the best of my knowledge, every society on the face of earth...every civilization from the dawn of man has recognized the unique relationship between a man and a woman. Marriage is the institution upon which families (Father, Mother, children) were/are built. It is the building block...no...more specifically, the CORNERSTONE of civilization. Is marriage often seen in a religious context? Yes. I grant you that. But even secular society has always recognized that the institution of marriage is a UNIQUE constitution between a man, and a woman. You can cast the blame on religion all you want... What it boils down to is this:

          Common Sense.

          Unfortunately, common sense is not so common anymore.

          The same people in this thread yelling and screaming that people need to be more tolerant of beliefs different than their own, are the same ones throwing stones and deriding and belittling people of religious persuasion that believe different.

          Hypocrisy...and two-facedness.

          *puts on flame-retardent material, since he knows he'll be burnt to a crisp by intolerant people*

          Comment

          • Crime Dog
            Ambassador to Newbies
            • Oct 2003
            • 219

            #65
            Sorry to double-post, but I think you'll find that most minorities are INSULTED by many people's insistence to use them and the issue of Civil Rights to promote gay marriage. I hear a lot of us "white folk" point to minorities to justify gay marriage. Before you do that, maybe you should ask the minorities you're using for your benefit how THEY feel about being manipulated for your political/moral gain...

            Comment

            • shartley
              paintball player
              • Mar 2001
              • 9169

              #66
              Originally posted by dansim
              rethinking about this over lunch, ive come to a conclusion that the people who associate gay marrige with being similar to necrophelia,bestiality and other sick fetishes are indeed twisted individuals who should seek some serious mental health

              www.ShartleyCustoms.com
              Custom Paintball Products and Accessories
              CLICK HERE to Check out our PDU SERIES GEAR!


              its more like a paper cut that has primadonna's yelling murder... - Glickman

              Comment

              • dansim
                ive been busy
                • Jun 2001
                • 4479

                #67
                Originally posted by shartley

                So although your post was spiteful and clearly meant to hurt, it falls flat when compared to what a good many already think about the homosexual community and the ACT of homosexuality itself. After all, homosexuality is NOT about who you choose to spend your life with, but about who you want to have SEX with.
                it was huh, hmm i guess you can read deep into my psyche, oh that right you cant. ~edited out for content in case any kiddies come in~ the previous was an observation, and i forgot releationships are all about having sex right..totally untrue.
                Last edited by dansim; 02-25-2004, 01:24 PM.

                Comment

                • Crime Dog
                  Ambassador to Newbies
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 219

                  #68
                  *notes the intolerance of a view other than what dansim believes.*

                  See what I mean? Refusal to see the other side of teh story, tolerate it, and even *gasp* respect it.

                  *sighs*

                  Comment

                  • Restola
                    Certificated Cloud Buster
                    • May 2001
                    • 2230

                    #69
                    Originally posted by dansim
                    rethinking about this over lunch, ive come to a conclusion that the people who associate gay marrige with being similar to necrophelia,bestiality and other sick fetishes are indeed twisted individuals who should seek some serious mental health
                    I don't think they are similar at all.

                    But if you think a gay's rights are being violated, how can you not think anyone else's rights aren't being violated.

                    Answer: because you drew a line somewhere. What's it based on? Your opinions.

                    AO Feedback / Ebay Feedback / AOPA / JeepForum.com / IPR

                    Comment

                    • dansim
                      ive been busy
                      • Jun 2001
                      • 4479

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Crime Dog
                      *notes the intolerance of a view other than what dansim believes.*

                      See what I mean? Refusal to see the other side of teh story, tolerate it, and even *gasp* respect it.

                      *sighs*
                      no not intorlerance, ignorance, just because a man types alot doesnt mean he knows what hes talking about, to state my post was malicious and trying to hurt someone is complete igonorance, it was mearly an observation

                      Comment

                      • 1stdeadeye
                        Still around????
                        • Jun 2002
                        • 8501

                        #71
                        Originally posted by dansim


                        hes right as we have the judicial system to interpet(sp) laws/amendments/the constitution, and the way they have interpeted it, its the sex of the person if they interpeted it your way impostal then there would be no problems
                        Except that the 19th ammendment is limited to suffrage. Gay people can already vote, so the 19th ammendment adds nothing to this arguement. That is why the women's right's advocates are always pushing for the ERA: Equal Rights Ammendment!

                        So your argument is way off base!

                        Comment

                        • Restola
                          Certificated Cloud Buster
                          • May 2001
                          • 2230

                          #72
                          Originally posted by dansim
                          just because a man types alot doesnt mean he knows what hes talking about
                          Words we should all think about

                          AO Feedback / Ebay Feedback / AOPA / JeepForum.com / IPR

                          Comment

                          • shartley
                            paintball player
                            • Mar 2001
                            • 9169

                            #73
                            Originally posted by dansim

                            it was huh, hmm i guess you can read deep into my psyche, and i forgot releationships are all about having sex right..totally untrue.
                            Last edited by shartley; 02-25-2004, 01:41 PM.

                            www.ShartleyCustoms.com
                            Custom Paintball Products and Accessories
                            CLICK HERE to Check out our PDU SERIES GEAR!


                            its more like a paper cut that has primadonna's yelling murder... - Glickman

                            Comment

                            • impostal22
                              disgruntled...
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 1623

                              #74
                              Originally posted by dansim


                              hes right as we have the judicial system to interpet(sp) laws/amendments/the constitution, and the way they have interpeted it, its the sex of the person if they interpeted it your way impostal then there would be no problems
                              that's what i was saying. i'm not saying *I* would interpret "sex" as anything but gender, but i'm saying that it's up to the courts how the law is interpretted.

                              Comment

                              • dansim
                                ive been busy
                                • Jun 2001
                                • 4479

                                #75
                                Originally posted by 1stdeadeye


                                Except that the 19th ammendment is limited to suffrage. Gay people can already vote, so the 19th ammendment adds nothing to this arguement. That is why the women's right's advocates are always pushing for the ERA: Equal Rights Ammendment!

                                So your argument is way off base!
                                i dont have an argument with you, i think were are all talking about different factors, of this thing, some people are argueing over religion,morals,laws im not really talking about anything except equal rights, and how some laws are based off of out of date religion, but you need the law makers to change that, not judges going agains state laws

                                Comment

                                Working...