Al Qaeda materials found in Iraq!

[FactsOfLife]

Saddam could say where the WMD's are buried, we'd go get them, FOX would show them, and The Boy would still deny they exist.

Guess CB didn't get that dose of reality I sent him for Christmas....

[Collegeboy]

Originally posted by FactsOfLife
Saddam could say where the WMD's are buried, we'd go get them, FOX would show them, and The Boy would still deny they exist.

Guess CB didn't get that dose of reality I sent him for Christmas....

I took it back because it was a faulty product.

[Jack_Dubious]

Im sure if you look hard enough you can find "Al Qaeda materials" in countries such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia...
oh wait ill take that back...you dont have to look that hard at all...

But they are our "Allies" so lets forget about them. Now everyone click your ruby red slippers together 3 times and repeat after me...
Al Qaeda and Iraq are linked.
Al Qaeda and Iraq are linked.
Al Qaeda and Iraq are linked.

Very good, now dont you feel blissful?

JDub

[trevorjk]

i must say although i dont like CB's style what he is saying is true... i mean i like to hear both sides find the facts see what is really going on.. and well america has no direct evidence, solid evidence. to prove leaders or countries are harboring or supporting terrorist... althought its quite obvious is going on it doesnt mean the government is supporting them... but from all the circumstancial evidence i see its kinda hard NOT to link terrorist with specific leaders or countries... i mean how long were those terrorist who crashed the planes on 9/11 in the US? would the government or president be harboring and supporting terrorist for giving them the oppertunity to come to the US to live, eat, sleep, and learn here. so from what i see going on all over the world we are just as guilty as the rest although evidence seams to be pointing that others may be directly involved and more guilty then the rest

thats all im going to say here

[1stdeadeye]

Originally posted by cphilip
I mean hell You ARE THE US CB!

I think I am going to be sick!

[Albinonewt]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Collegeboy
Again ABN shows he can not understand a post. You just proved what I said.

" I make a statement that there isn't any proof that Saddam and Al Queda are working together for the destruction of the US for at this point there isn't any. I say that they wasn't for the information at this point says no."

TO which I repeat. SO what? You use that as evidence that there is no connection, I say WHO CARES? Who cares what the specific intent was? Maybe Saddam was giving them aid to help them carry out attacks in France. It's still aiding global terrorism, and it has to be stopped.

Funny how you leave out other quotes, please be truthful next time.

And so what about that quote? It's ambigious and it doesn't make a statement one way or the other. It says we allege Saddam does, you at no point make the accusation yourself.


No just a lot of them including the US.

We do not have a policy of harboring terrorists. We arrest, send to trial, and convict / deport as many as we can. We do not support terrorism.

Funny how you're willing to believe that Bush supports terror but Saddam doesn't.

the last statement is the US reluctance to see the Kurdish militants as terrorist or its quickness to separate Kurdish terrorist from Kurds but its reluctance to separate Palestinian terrorist from Palestinians.

You do know there are troops stationed in the Northern territory and that they conduct raids every so often don't you? It's simple really. We claim the terorrists/camps we blast belong to Saddam (and not the Kurds) and in exchange for us pretending that they're not working against they actually don't work against us.

And for the Palestinians, the Bush administration condemns nearly every thrust into Palestine that Sharon makes. Bush really doesn't want Sharon doing that, but on the other hand he obviously doesn't want to side with the terrorists by stopping Israel forcefully. The unfortunate thing for the Palestinians innocents is that to protect them you also have to protect the terrorists. They are in a hard spot.

[Albinonewt]

trevorjk:

Wrong, wrong, wrong wrong wrong.

As I stated above, there are mountains of difference between the gov of the US and Saddams Tyranny. I went into prett close detail the difference just half a page up, so I don't want to rewrite it. But suffice to say that if the Iraqi government (which was basically a police state) has its agents meet with agents of terrorism then its almost a gauranteed fact that Saddam had something to do with it.

The fact that the 9/11 terrorists were in the US for a while doesn't mean the government was supporting them. In fact, that they were allowed to move around free and clear is evidence that we live in a free society that doesn't run itself as a police state.

People that claim we supported the 9/11 terrorists and then say they like to hear the facts are just liars.

[FactsOfLife]

Originally posted by Collegeboy


I took it back because it was a faulty product.

now that's funny....

[Collegeboy]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Albinonewt

Originally posted by Collegeboy
Again ABN shows he can not understand a post. You just proved what I said.

" I make a statement that there isn't any proof that Saddam and Al Queda are working together for the destruction of the US for at this point there isn't any. I say that they wasn't for the information at this point says no."

TO which I repeat. SO what? You use that as evidence that there is no connection, I say WHO CARES? Who cares what the specific intent was? Maybe Saddam was giving them aid to help them carry out attacks in France. It's still aiding global terrorism, and it has to be stopped.

Funny how you leave out other quotes, please be truthful next time.

And so what about that quote? It's ambigious and it doesn't make a statement one way or the other. It says we allege Saddam does, you at no point make the accusation yourself.


No just a lot of them including the US.

We do not have a policy of harboring terrorists. We arrest, send to trial, and convict / deport as many as we can. We do not support terrorism.

Funny how you're willing to believe that Bush supports terror but Saddam doesn't.

the last statement is the US reluctance to see the Kurdish militants as terrorist or its quickness to separate Kurdish terrorist from Kurds but its reluctance to separate Palestinian terrorist from Palestinians.

You do know there are troops stationed in the Northern territory and that they conduct raids every so often don't you? It's simple really. We claim the terorrists/camps we blast belong to Saddam (and not the Kurds) and in exchange for us pretending that they're not working against they actually don't work against us.

And for the Palestinians, the Bush administration condemns nearly every thrust into Palestine that Sharon makes. Bush really doesn't want Sharon doing that, but on the other hand he obviously doesn't want to side with the terrorists by stopping Israel forcefully. The unfortunate thing for the Palestinians innocents is that to protect them you also have to protect the terrorists. They are in a hard spot.

Who cares, everyone should. It is important to clearly understand each sides involvement in the terrorist activities, is it just talking with them, is it giving them money to go away, or is it systematically helping them to plan and execute an attack against the US.

I know the US has and continually give support to terrorist, that is without a doubt, we turn a blind eye to those that can bring some help, but then conjure up public sentiment against those who we deem not worth our troubles. Your last statement says this. If Bush was true to his word he would be going after the Kurdish militants that supported the Kurdish terrorist (PKK or PRK) and Al Queda, instead of helping them.

Why is Bush willing to reward the terrorist actions of the Kurdish terrorist by giving them control in a state and talking about giving them a nation of their own, but is not willing to reward the Palestinian terrorist.

[Sir_Brass]

Originally posted by Collegeboy
Again ABN shows he can not understand a post. You just proved what I said.

" I make a statement that there isn't any proof that Saddam and Al Queda are working together for the destruction of the US for at this point there isn't any. I say that they wasn't for the information at this point says no."

Funny how you leave out other quotes, please be truthful next time.





No just a lot of them including the US.

the last statement is the US reluctance to see the Kurdish militants as terrorist or its quickness to separate Kurdish terrorist from Kurds but its reluctance to separate Palestinian terrorist from Palestinians.

Once again we see CB trying to back away from stuff he stated as facts and trying to show that we all misunderstood him again.

CB, if everyone except yourself misunderstands you, then it's time you learned to speak English. And if you already speak English, then maybe it's time for you to stop tauting your own blind speculation as the God-given truth.

[member#10,261]

They found Al Qaeda materials in England as well, thats old news.
But dose that mean Al Qaeda is working with the Brits?
No, of corse not.

I do think Al Qaeda and Sadam were helping eachother.
How...I don't know.
To what extent...I don't know.

I don't know what my point is, but I am sure I had one when I started typing.

Sorry for wasting your time

[-Carnifex-]

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to agree with CB. I don't see how the materials found link Saddam and the terrorists (thought I agree there is a link.).

[Miscue]

Originally posted by -Carnifex-
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to agree with CB. I don't see how the materials found link Saddam and the terrorists (thought I agree there is a link.).

If you found your girlfriend's panties in my apartment, would you also not believe that there was a link between us?

I mean, it's no "proof" that we did the dirty... maybe I snuck up to her, and pulled them off when she wasn't looking... right?

I mean... come on. This is just getting stupid.

[-Carnifex-]

Terrorists may very well be operating in the US, that doesn't mean Bush is harboring them intentionally.

[-Carnifex-]

Oh, I missed that part. Nevermind, nix whatever I said before. You'd have to be an idiot not to recognize a link.